{"title":"Antisemitism, Holocaust Denial, and Germany’s Far Right: How the AfD Tiptoes around Nazism","authors":"M. Kahn","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2069337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2069337","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines antisemitism and Holocaust denial in contemporary Far-Right German politics with a focus on the party Alternative for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland, AfD). The article argues that the AfD has attempted to ‘tiptoe around Nazism’—a phrase coined by the author, which describes how the party has strategically and haphazardly reacted to scandals as they arise in order to avoid being associated with Nazism and losing moderate voters. The first section investigates how the AfD has reacted to various internal scandals that have damaged its reputation. This analysis encompasses the party’s fraught relationship to the Islamophobic, anti-refugee organization PEGIDA (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamicization of the Occident) as well as the ‘Höcke Affair,’ in which prominent AfD leader Björn Höcke denigrated the Berlin Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe as a ‘monument of shame.’ The second section examines the AfD’s proactive attempts to tiptoe around Nazism by portraying itself as philosemitic and pro-Israel and courting Jewish voters as part of its controversial subgroup Jews in the AfD (Juden in der AfD, JAfD). Here it explains how JAfD members, particularly Jews who immigrated to Germany from the former Soviet Union, have rationalized their paradoxical support for this outwardly antisemitic and denialist party. The conclusion situates the AfD in the broader transatlantic context of Far-Right extremism, highlighting trends that may signal—yet, more likely, will fail to bring about—the party’s demise.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121922418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Marginalization and Local Commemoration of Third Reich Victims in Germany","authors":"Thomas B. Vanderbeek","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2062921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2062921","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the summer of 2017, the German city of Freiburg im Breisgau inaugurated the prominent Platz der Alten Synagoge memorial commemorating the local Jewish community, which suffered immensely under the Third Reich. As visitors began playing in the memorial’s wading pool, controversy immediately arose regarding the appropriateness of such behavior. Indeed, the local Jewish communities advocated for preventing this activity in the commemorative space, but the behavior continues to this day. As this article demonstrates, Freiburg’s Jewish communities have repeatedly faced marginalization throughout Platz der Alten Synagoge’s development, despite strong efforts to involve Jewish perspectives at the outset. Freiburg’s local commemorative efforts fit into a larger narrative of commemoration in Germany. Scholars have begun emphasizing the distinctions between national ‘centralized’ memory projects conducted by the Federal Government, such as the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin, and local commemoration in various other German cities and towns. Analyzing Freiburg’s commemorative efforts in comparison with national memory projects, this article argues that Freiburg’s Platz der Alten Synagoge undermines the national narrative’s reputation of success and effectiveness. The development of Freiburg’s project demonstrates the mixed impact and influence of national commemorative efforts on local commemoration processes in Germany today. Ultimately, this case study poses further research questions on how local and regional memory of Third Reich victims has reacted to the ‘centralized’ national memory process, and its analysis suggests that components of both the national and local processes can offer advantages to public memory projects going forward.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129840597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘You Survived? We Were Told All Jews Were Gassed’: Jews, Czechs, and the Memory of the Holocaust","authors":"Eva Kalousová","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2071195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2071195","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article discusses postwar memory of the Holocaust in Czechoslovakia, with a focus on Moravia and Czech–Jewish relations. The case study explores the development during and after World War II in the town of Uherský Brod (Ungarisch Brod), which was home to a significant Jewish community before the war. Based on the archival sources, literature, and oral history testimonies, the paper addresses the wartime imposition of antisemitic measures and emergence of anti-Jewish stereotypes and illustrates the reactions of the non-Jewish local majority to the persecution of the town Jews. Memory of the Shoah is depicted based on the experiences of the individual participants and shows that some survivors encountered friendly acceptance from non-Jews while others experience hatred and refusal. Even among the educated and those of higher social strata, the article proves that antisemitic stereotypes remain in the majority society to this day.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129160550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Innocent Perpetrators: The Portrayal of ‘German Victimhood’ in Unsere Mütter, Unsere Väter (Generation War) (2013)","authors":"Lukas Meissel","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2071196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2071196","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores how the German TV production Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter (2013) characterizes the ‘war generation’ with regard to its role in Nazi crimes and as perpetrators, both on screen and as a historical TV event. The three-part TV miniseries tells the story of five young Germans between 1941 and 1945. The narrative of the episodes follows the five friends who supposedly symbolize representative experiences of the war: four non-Jewish characters—two soldiers, a nurse, an artist—and one Jewish one. The involvement of the Gentile characters in crimes is shown, but they are never portrayed as antisemitic or ideological; rather, their deeds are explained by the overwhelming circumstances they find themselves in. They might become perpetrators, but they remain innocent in their intentions. The first screening of the TV miniseries in Germany and Austria was accompanied by educational materials, on-screen roundtable discussions, and documentaries. I argue that the TV production and its promotional campaign portrayed Germans primarily as victims of the war rather than exploring questions concerning the willing involvement of Germans in Nazi atrocities. This is done using references to and aspects of Holocaust cinema and Holocaust memory that serve as the blueprint for an apologetic story that presents Germans as a community of victims rather than perpetrators. Beyond the silver screen, Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter represents broader contemporary developments in ‘coming to terms with the past’ in German film, focusing on ‘German victimhood’ that resonate with contemporary debates in German society about its immediate past.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128653080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Fundamentally Singular Crime","authors":"Saul Friedländer","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2026703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2026703","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article deals with the debate over Dirk Moses' essay “The German Catechism,” which sparked controversy after its publication in May 2021. In his piece, Moses argues that the Holocaust should be examined in unison with the genocides perpetrated during colonialism. This article criticizes Moses' interpretation that questions the singularity of the Holocaust, stressing instead that the Shoah is fundamentally different from other historical crimes. It reveals the inherent flaws in Moses' essay, while pointing to the potentially dangerous influence of the postcolonial thought advocated by Moses on anti-Israel sentiment and the rise of antisemitism.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116119130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Yehuda Bauer, the Concepts of Holocaust and Genocide, and the Issue of Settler Colonialism","authors":"C. Browning","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2021.2012985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.2012985","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines Yehuda Bauer's treatment of the concepts of Holocaust and genocide as well as Raphael Lemkin's understanding of the relationship between genocide and settler colonialism. “Intent” has been central to the concept of genocide (both in Lemkin's definition and in the UN Convention) but difficult to locate and identify in the historical practice of settler colonialism, despite the destruction of groups as such that the latter has caused. This article argues for two concepts of genocide: systematic and systemic. The former, based on the Holocaust paradigm, focuses on intent, while the latter, based on settler colonialism, focuses on outcome.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"2019 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128070214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Life and Death of the Shtetl","authors":"O. Bartov","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2021.2018845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.2018845","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyzes the contributions and limitations of Yehuda Bauer's 2009 book The Death of the Shtetl. It argues that the book heralded a new trend in Holocaust historiography by focusing on the eastern borderlands and closely observing the response of a limited number Jewish communities there to the German occupation, especially as concerns “amidah,” or unarmed resistance. But the article also points out that Bauer's limited use of available sources obscured the degree of Jewish collaboration with the Germans; the fluidity between Jewish policemen and resisters; the reliance of Jewish resistance on local Christian assistance or underground organizations; the impact on events of long-term relations between the different groups in a highly interethnic region; and the intimacy of the mass murder of the Jews, which was carried out by German perpetrators who had gotten to know their victims over months of occupation and by neighbors who had lived side by side with them for their entire lives. The article argues that a more focused and nuanced local history of the Holocaust in a single location can shed light on aspects of the “final solution” often obscured by top-down histories or even “quasi-regional” histories such as Bauer's.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129469234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conceptualizing Jewish Reactions: Between Amidah and Resistance","authors":"Havi Dreifuss","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2025693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2025693","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the concept of amidah and its relevance as an effective conceptual category in Holocaust research. By examining the growth of the concept of amidah at the beginning of Holocaust research, discussing the many categories included in it, emphasizing its ahistorical character and detachment from broad contexts, the author argues that this term does not promote in-depth and critical discussion. In light of these obstacles, Bauer's early conceptions regarding the concept of amidah are analyzed while placing it in the context of the discussion of responses to the Holocaust. As part of those broader contexts of human reactions to extremist actions, Bauer's early reference to those actions called “amidah” opens the door to a comprehensive and in-depth discussion that is not possible within the original concept. This discussion obviates the need for a hierarchical catalogue of the responses under discussion, includes reference to the constant change that has taken place in these actions, and is based on the consciousness that underlies the response. Moreover, it connects amidah to the ability to analyze acts by Jews and non-Jews in the Holocaust, as well as those of a variety of individuals and communities who found themselves in the reality of genocide.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117153756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reflections on an Academic Path: The Inspiration of a Teacher and Mentor","authors":"D. Ofer","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2021.2018851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.2018851","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\u0000 The focus of this article is the author's experience as both a student and a colleague of Prof. Bauer and its impact on her development as a historian of the Holocaust. It is a reflection of her contemporary interpretation of their long years of activity at the Hebrew University. The article relates to Bauer as a teacher and a leader of Holocaust studies in Israel. The author addresses the seminars Bauer conducted with students of different backgrounds and his influence on patterns and methodologies of research. Her experience in the Vidal Sassoon Center of Research of Antisemitism manifests Bauer's impact on her understanding of academic leadership, which followed her in other academic appointments.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125406241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Estimates of the Losses of Polish Jews in Hiding, 1942–1945: Revisiting Yehuda Bauer’s Observations","authors":"J. Grabowski","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2021.2014673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.2014673","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Polish general elections of 2015 brought to power a right-wing, nationalistic party called PiS (Law & Justice). Since then, the nationalists have been busy dismantling the fundamental components of the democratic system, appropriating the entire machinery of the state, and attacking independent judges and journalists. However, their obsession with the defense of the so-called good name of the nation made history one of the most internationally visible areas of confrontation. And Holocaust studies, Holocaust research, and Holocaust education quickly found themselves at the very heart of this struggle over the past. In order to defend the myth of the alleged national innocence during the war, the Polish authorities have become one of the chief agents of Holocaust distortion worldwide. A number of institutions are now involved in a relentless campaign intended to prove that rescuing the Jews during the Shoah was the default position of Polish society. Driven by a phenomenon known as “Holocaust envy,” the official narrative multiplies the ranks of Polish Righteous Among the Nations and strives to present the Polish suffering, and the Polish physical losses, at par with the Jewish ones. The research into the scale of Polish complicity in the Holocaust therefore raises particular ire of the Polish state. Conservative estimates indicate that around 200,000 Jews were either killed or denounced to the Germans by the Poles.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"290 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116401699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}