Przeglad Sejmowy最新文献_第5页

Zakres terytorialny stosowania umów handlowych Unii Europejskiej – pomiędzy teorią a praktyką. Uwagi w świetle orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej 欧洲联盟贸易协定的领土适用范围——介于理论和实践之间。根据欧洲联盟法院判例法发表的评论

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.162

Adriana Kalicka-Mikołajczyk

{"title":"Zakres terytorialny stosowania umów handlowych Unii Europejskiej – pomiędzy teorią a praktyką. Uwagi w świetle orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej","authors":"Adriana Kalicka-Mikołajczyk","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.162","url":null,"abstract":"As a general rule on the territorial scope of treaties, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 assumes that a treaty binds each party in respect of its entire territory. However, this is only a presumption, as any party may decide otherwise. In the second half of the 1990s, the European Union concluded the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements with Israel and Morocco, which contain in their content, a very generally worded territorial clause, according to which they apply to the territory of the European Union, and Israel or Morocco. However, this seemingly clear and precise rule has in practice caused numerous problems in bilateral relations between the European Union and Israel and between the European Union and Morocco. The purpose of this paper is firstly, to characterise the territorial scope of the Treaties in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, both in theory and in practice, using the example of the trade agreements concluded by the European Union with Israel and Morocco. Secondly, to point out that in practice this scope is much broader, as it includes “third” territories such as those of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Thirdly, to answer the question whether this practice is compatible with the obligations to respect the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law imposed on the European Union by Articles 3(5) and 21(1) of the Treaty on European Union.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69367330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Prawne instrumenty oddziaływania głowy państwa na parlament. Case studies systemów politycznych Federacji Rosyjskiej, Republiki Białorusi i Ukrainy 国家元首对议会影响的法律文书。俄罗斯联邦、白俄罗斯共和国和乌克兰政治制度个案研究

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.90

Maryana Prokop

引用次数: 0

Rola Sądu Najwyższego Państwa Izrael w kontekście stabilności ustroju politycznego opartego na konstytucji nieskodyfikowanej 以色列国最高法院在以未经修改的宪法为基础的政治制度稳定方面的作用

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.89

Łukasz Perlikowski

引用次数: 0

O metodzie prac ustrojowych w II Rzeczypospolitej. Praktyka parlamentarna w procesie przekształceń konstytucyjnych 关于第二共和国的政治工作方法。宪法转型过程中的议会实践

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.91

M. Wojtacki

{"title":"O metodzie prac ustrojowych w II Rzeczypospolitej. Praktyka parlamentarna w procesie przekształceń konstytucyjnych","authors":"M. Wojtacki","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.91","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.91","url":null,"abstract":"This study depicts the evolution of doctrine and political practice in the Second Republic of Poland in the field of the parliament’s constitutional work. The influence of the native politico-legal tradition, first of all the Constitution of 3 May, on the solutions adopted in the March Constitution has also been discussed, particularly in terms of obligatory revision of the fundamental law. Additionally, the paper mentions the process of departure from the concepts arising from the experiences of the partitioning states in favour of the republican ideas, which although not exactly identical, were nonetheless closer to the Polish political tradition, the reflection of which was the formula of extraordinary revision based on the French constitutionalism. The text also refers to the proceedings of the enactment of the April Constitution, which were inconsistent with the prevailing constitutional norms. The legitimisation of these activities was constituted by the decisions of the Marshals of both chambers of the Polish parliament, resulting from the powers conferred on them by the internal regulations of the representation. Furthermore, it was indicated that the parallel introduction into the political system of institutions created in entirely different historical and social conditions led to a crisis of the state and its structures and consequently to the systemic change, the expression of which was the new constitution in 1935.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69367863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Glosa do postanowień Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w sprawach Grimmark vs. Szwecja oraz Steen vs. Szwecja z dnia 11 lutego 2020 r. – sprzeciw sumienia położnych 关于欧洲人权法院2020年2月11日对格里姆马克诉瑞典和斯廷诉瑞典的裁决的声明。

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.92

Oktawian Nawrot

引用次数: 0

O zagadnieniu współpracy organów władzy wykonawczej w systemach półprezydenckich 关于半总统制行政机构的合作问题

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.106

R. Czachor

引用次数: 0

Dwukrotny impeachment prezydenta Donalda Trumpa jako precedens w historii Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki 唐纳德·特朗普总统的双重弹劾是美利坚合众国历史上的先例

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.100

Izabela Kraśnicka

引用次数: 1

Dwukadencyjność w debatach parlamentarnych o wprowadzeniu limitacji kadencji wójtów, burmistrzów i prezydentów 关于实行市长、市长和总统任期限制的两届议会辩论

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.123

Maciej Drzonek

引用次数: 0

Quo vadis Britannia? Davida Hume’a rozważania nad angielską konstytucją 库瓦迪斯·不列颠尼亚？大卫·休谟对英国宪法的反思

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.130

Tomasz Tulejski

{"title":"Quo vadis Britannia? Davida Hume’a rozważania nad angielską konstytucją","authors":"Tomasz Tulejski","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.130","url":null,"abstract":"The reign of the Hanoverian dynasty was a period of stability and prosperity in Great Britain, until the 1770s. The perfect symbiosis between the Whig oligarchy and the Crown was the cause of exceptional political stability. During this period, however, there were also neither major constitutional disorders nor sophisticated systematic analyses. According to the author, the most important attempt to describe British political mechanics is the political reflection of David Hume. David Hume, the most eminent British philosopher of the 18th century, is the author of an original and penetrating analysis of British political institutions. Arguing without regard to party sympathies, he broke down Whig and Tory conceptions of political systems, and instead proposed a dynamic vision of Great Britain’s political system, from its past as a barbarian monarchy, through a civilised monarchy, to a mixed modern monarchy. He sees this evolution as a dialectical struggle between power and liberty, the two most important forces that govern political systems. This article presents an attempt to reconstruct Hume’s coherent constitutional theory based on historical, political, and philosophical aspects of his argument. According to the author, all three perspectives form a coherent argument that makes Hume one of the classics of English constitutionalism. The author develops these ideas on the basis of a detailed analysis of Hume’s works, starting with the History of England.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69347528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Z dziejów badań nad parlamentaryzmem Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów w historiografii polskiej (do 1939 r.) 从波兰史学对两国共和国议会制的研究史（至1939年r。）

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.121

Lidia Michalska-Bracha

引用次数: 0