Przeglad Sejmowy最新文献_第6页

O metodzie prac ustrojowych w II Rzeczypospolitej. Praktyka parlamentarna w procesie przekształceń konstytucyjnych 关于第二共和国的政治工作方法。宪法转型过程中的议会实践

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.91

M. Wojtacki

{"title":"O metodzie prac ustrojowych w II Rzeczypospolitej. Praktyka parlamentarna w procesie przekształceń konstytucyjnych","authors":"M. Wojtacki","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.91","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.91","url":null,"abstract":"This study depicts the evolution of doctrine and political practice in the Second Republic of Poland in the field of the parliament’s constitutional work. The influence of the native politico-legal tradition, first of all the Constitution of 3 May, on the solutions adopted in the March Constitution has also been discussed, particularly in terms of obligatory revision of the fundamental law. Additionally, the paper mentions the process of departure from the concepts arising from the experiences of the partitioning states in favour of the republican ideas, which although not exactly identical, were nonetheless closer to the Polish political tradition, the reflection of which was the formula of extraordinary revision based on the French constitutionalism. The text also refers to the proceedings of the enactment of the April Constitution, which were inconsistent with the prevailing constitutional norms. The legitimisation of these activities was constituted by the decisions of the Marshals of both chambers of the Polish parliament, resulting from the powers conferred on them by the internal regulations of the representation. Furthermore, it was indicated that the parallel introduction into the political system of institutions created in entirely different historical and social conditions led to a crisis of the state and its structures and consequently to the systemic change, the expression of which was the new constitution in 1935.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69367863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Glosa do postanowień Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w sprawach Grimmark vs. Szwecja oraz Steen vs. Szwecja z dnia 11 lutego 2020 r. – sprzeciw sumienia położnych 关于欧洲人权法院2020年2月11日对格里姆马克诉瑞典和斯廷诉瑞典的裁决的声明。

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.92

Oktawian Nawrot

引用次数: 0

Filozofia polityczna jako narzędzie badania prawa 作为法律研究工具的政治哲学

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.112

M. Chmieliński

引用次数: 0

Głowa państwa polskiego w latach 1918–1997 Recenzja publikacji: Jacek M. Majchrowskii, Historia ustroju Polski 1918–1997. Głowa państwa 1918–1997年的波兰国家元首对该出版物的评论：Jacek M.Majchrowski，《1918–1997波兰制度史》。国家元首

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.147

T. Litwin

引用次数: 0

Standardy niezależności sądów i niezawisłości sędziowskiej – wybrane zagadnienia na przykładzie orzecznictwa sądów europejskich 司法独立和司法独立标准——根据欧洲法院判例法选定的问题

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.148

A. Kalisz

引用次数: 0

Uwagi o statusie prawnym Komendanta Straży Marszałkowskiej 论元帅卫队司令的法律地位

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.95

Małgorzata Grześków

{"title":"Uwagi o statusie prawnym Komendanta Straży Marszałkowskiej","authors":"Małgorzata Grześków","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.95","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.95","url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the position of the Marshal’s Guard and the legal status of the guards employed in this formation have changed significantly. Under the provisions of the Act of 26 January 2018, the Marshal’s Guard gained the attribute of militarised service. On the basis of the solutions adopted by this regulation, the guards of the Marshal’s Guard are no longer employees of state offices but officers performing their duties on the basis of a non-employment relationships. Despite the (seemingly) identical regulations, the legal status of the Chief of the Marshal’s Guard has also changed on the basis of the 2018 Act. Currently, the Chief of the Marshal’s Guard can be both an officer of this service and a person without such an attribute. The article attempts to characterise the legal status of the Chief of the Marshal’s Guard, whose position in the state structure does not fit into the model solution used by other pragmatics. In the comparative context the service pragmatics of other militarised formations were also taken into account. Contrary to most regulations, the Chief of the Marshal’s Guard is not a central body of government administration. Besides, the Act of 26 January 2018 on the Marshal’s Guard is the only one that authorises the act of appointment to the post of head of the service not by the Prime Minister, but by the Head of the Chancellery of the Sejm. The publication attempts to establish the possible reasons for the introduction of such normative solutions. In particular, efforts were made to answer the question of whether these solutions are a consequence of the principle of the Sejm’s autonomy. Finally, the employment status of the Chief of the Marshal’s Guard is an issue that requires analysis and is discussed in the article. Taking into account the variety of forms of employment occurring in the militarised services, as well as the lack of precise statutory regulations in this field, the nature (employee or non-employee) of this employment relationship requires clarification.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69367944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Działalność posłów wybranych w 44. okręgu wyborczym (Tarnobrzeg, Kolbuszowa, Mielec i Nisko) na forum Sejmu Ustawodawczego RP w latach 1919–1922 44年当选成员的活动。1919年至1922年波兰共和国立法院论坛上的选区（Tarnobrzeg、Kolbuszów、Mielec和Nisko）

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.108

Tomasz Sumara

引用次数: 0

Reformy samorządności lokalnej w Indiach – przesłanki i determinanty 印度地方政府改革的先决条件和决定因素

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.111

G. Bywalec

引用次数: 0

Partycypacja sejmowej opozycji w wypełnianiu funkcji kreacyjnej 众议院反对派参与履行创造性职能

Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.31268/ps.2022.126

K. Matuszek