2021年11月23日,Białystok省行政法院。第二幕SA/Bk 660/21

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
A. Modrzejewski
{"title":"2021年11月23日,Białystok省行政法院。第二幕SA/Bk 660/21","authors":"A. Modrzejewski","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The commented judgment is the voice of the jurisprudence in matters which are highly controversial and in which different lines of case law clash. This mainly concerns the issues of omission of the order in the scope of the maintenance obligation towards the person requiring care, which may be directly related to the questioning the nature of the decision granting the nursing benefit, as a bound, and not a discretionary decision, as well as allowing persons who provide care to apply for the benefit in situations where the person requiring care is married but the spouse for various reasons does not provide such care. It should be stated that the position of the Administrative Court in Białystok pointing to the possibility of granting a nursing benefit to the actual guardian, one of the family members (siblings of the person requiring care) in a situation where the disabled person is married, the spouse does not take care of him or her, and does not have a certified degree of disability, while at the same time there are other persons who do not exercise care over the disabled person, but are obliged to pay alimony, is incorrect.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glosa do Wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Białymstoku z dnia 23 listopada 2021 r., sygn. akt II SA/Bk 660/21\",\"authors\":\"A. Modrzejewski\",\"doi\":\"10.31268/ps.2022.146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The commented judgment is the voice of the jurisprudence in matters which are highly controversial and in which different lines of case law clash. This mainly concerns the issues of omission of the order in the scope of the maintenance obligation towards the person requiring care, which may be directly related to the questioning the nature of the decision granting the nursing benefit, as a bound, and not a discretionary decision, as well as allowing persons who provide care to apply for the benefit in situations where the person requiring care is married but the spouse for various reasons does not provide such care. It should be stated that the position of the Administrative Court in Białystok pointing to the possibility of granting a nursing benefit to the actual guardian, one of the family members (siblings of the person requiring care) in a situation where the disabled person is married, the spouse does not take care of him or her, and does not have a certified degree of disability, while at the same time there are other persons who do not exercise care over the disabled person, but are obliged to pay alimony, is incorrect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在具有高度争议性和不同判例法相冲突的问题上,评议判决是法理学的声音。这主要涉及对需要照顾的人的抚养义务范围中遗漏命令的问题,这可能直接关系到对给予护理津贴的决定的性质的质疑,这是一种约束,而不是一种酌情决定,以及在需要照顾的人已婚但配偶因各种原因不提供这种照顾的情况下,允许提供照顾的人申请这种津贴。应该指出,行政法院的位置在Białystok指向的可能性给予护理有利于实际的监护人,家庭成员之一(兄弟姐妹的人需要照顾)残疾人的处境是已婚,配偶不照顾他或她,并没有经过认证的残疾程度,同时还有其它人不锻炼照顾残疾人,但有义务支付赡养费,是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glosa do Wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Białymstoku z dnia 23 listopada 2021 r., sygn. akt II SA/Bk 660/21
The commented judgment is the voice of the jurisprudence in matters which are highly controversial and in which different lines of case law clash. This mainly concerns the issues of omission of the order in the scope of the maintenance obligation towards the person requiring care, which may be directly related to the questioning the nature of the decision granting the nursing benefit, as a bound, and not a discretionary decision, as well as allowing persons who provide care to apply for the benefit in situations where the person requiring care is married but the spouse for various reasons does not provide such care. It should be stated that the position of the Administrative Court in Białystok pointing to the possibility of granting a nursing benefit to the actual guardian, one of the family members (siblings of the person requiring care) in a situation where the disabled person is married, the spouse does not take care of him or her, and does not have a certified degree of disability, while at the same time there are other persons who do not exercise care over the disabled person, but are obliged to pay alimony, is incorrect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信