发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
儒家為什麼反對超人類主義？ 儒家为什么反对超人类主义？
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191959
Qianqian Yang
{"title":"儒家為什麼反對超人類主義？","authors":"Qianqian Yang","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191959","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000The concept of human enhancement is a key to understanding transhumanism. According to Confucian ethics, the supervision of human enhancement technology is vital because we are facing the reasonable expectation of achieving “the unity of heaven and man.” (The idea of harmony between man and nature is not exclusive to Confucianism; it can be found in other schools of thought in the pre-Qin dynasty period, especially the philosophy of Taoism. However, the idea is uniquely expressed and developed in Confucianism.) Furthermore, human enhancement makes people unable to “settle in their place.” Therefore, Confucianism cannot accept it.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49421558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
放棄人類胚胎“14天限制” 的倫理反駁 放弃人类胚胎“14天限制”的伦理反驳
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191947
Xinqing Zhang
{"title":"放棄人類胚胎“14天限制” 的倫理反駁","authors":"Xinqing Zhang","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191947","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000This article explores prominent arguments in favor of and against extending the current 14-day statutory limit on the maintenance of human embryos. I discuss the history of the 14-day limit and the reasons behind the decision to opt for a compromise between competing moral views. I then argue that the ISSCR's guidelines for extending the 14-day limit are not a valuable tool, despite their potential to contribute scientific knowledge. The importance of respecting the 14-day rule should be acknowledged by ethics committees in the current research ethics climate of mainland China.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41645962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
在中國的科研倫理規範體系建設中重視公眾參與 在中国的科研伦理规范体系建设中重视公众参与
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191943
Lianhe Yu
{"title":"在中國的科研倫理規範體系建設中重視公眾參與","authors":"Lianhe Yu","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191943","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191943","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000It is an inspiring idea that public participation should be the key factor for determining the human embryo research policy. However, public participation is missing from the Chinese government's vision of an ethics regulation system for scientific research. This article argues that to develop human embryo research policy for China and a new regulation system globally, the most important tasks may be to set rules for public participation and to understand the views on human embryo and cell-based embryo research ethics held by different stakeholders and the Chinese public.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44892687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
論胚胎的道德地位——儒家倫理的視角 論胚胎的道德地位——儒家倫理的視角
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191942
Xiuqin Shen, Feng Pan
{"title":"論胚胎的道德地位——儒家倫理的視角","authors":"Xiuqin Shen, Feng Pan","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191942","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000For 40 years, international rules have limited human embryo research to the first 14 days of embryonic development. On May 26, 2021, in its latest guidelines for stem cell research and its medical applications, the International Society for Stem Cell Research eased the 14-day restriction. This raises myriad ethical issues. At their core is the debate over the moral status of embryos, which exposes ethical conflicts between cultural perspectives. This article discusses the moral status of embryos and argues from the perspective of Confucian ethics that the 14-day limit should not be waived at the present moment.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41778389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
論人體胚胎研究“軟法”修改之正當性 论人体胚胎研究“软法”修改之正当性
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191946
C. Ding
{"title":"論人體胚胎研究“軟法”修改之正當性","authors":"C. Ding","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191946","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000This commentary briefly discusses the substantive and procedural justifications for amending the longstanding 14-day rule, a soft-law limitation on the culturing of human embryos. The 14-day rule was established on the basis of general recognition of the human embryo's special status, accompanied by widespread public conversation and engagement. In principle, amending this rule would require the same substantive and procedural justifications. However, such justifications were absent prior to the lifting of the rule by the ISSCR in its 2021 guidelines. This article also discusses the value and importance of the 14-day rule to the development of human embryo research in the last three decades. Discarding the rule without the proper substantive and procedural justifications is likely to damage public trust and confidence in future human embryo research.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48634573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
前言：科技興趣、超越人類與倫理限制 前言：科技兴趣、超越人类与伦理限制
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191939
Yu-hong Cai, R. Fan
{"title":"前言：科技興趣、超越人類與倫理限制","authors":"Yu-hong Cai, R. Fan","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191939","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000人類正處於前所未有的技術高速發展時代。特別是，NBIC技術（納米技術、生物技術、資訊技術和認知科學）彙集起來的發展，使得人類改造自身、進而超越自身的夢想不斷接近現實，但也為我們敲響了倫理學的警鐘：如果我們對生命技術的不斷突破和廣泛應用所牽涉的倫理價值缺乏充分的考量並施以必要的限制，那麼技術就無法得到有利的發展和公平的應用，甚至造成過分追求那些具有不可逆結果或不可逆傷害的生命技術的後果，使得現代生物醫學成為人類幸福的一種“錯誤承諾”。本期的兩篇主題論文以及十六篇評論文章，正是著力於探討這些影響深遠的生命倫理問題。 \u0000This issue of the journal contains two thematic papers, namely “Emerging Human Embryo Research Technologies, the 14-day Rule, and the Special Status of the Embryo” by Kirstin R. W. Matthews, Sam Lowe, and Ana S. Iltis, and “A Confucian Reflection on Transhumanism: How to Regulate Our Posthuman Future?” by Wang Jue, in addition to 16 commentary essays on ethical issues associated with rapidly developing biomedical technologies. The authors argue that scientific interests should not be the main driver of technological breakthroughs and applications. Rather, ethical commitments embedded in cultural traditions should play a positive role through public participation in legitimate policymaking.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49000386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
對〈新興人體胚胎研究技術、 十四天規則和胚胎的特殊地位〉一文的回應 对〈新兴人体胚胎研究技术、 十四天规则和胚胎的特殊地位〉一文的回应
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191944
Yuyu Guo, Xueying Zhang
{"title":"對〈新興人體胚胎研究技術、 十四天規則和胚胎的特殊地位〉一文的回應","authors":"Yuyu Guo, Xueying Zhang","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191944","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000This paper responds to “Emerging Human Embryo Research Technologies, the 14-Day Rule, and the Special Status of the Embryo” by analyzing the moral status of the embryo. We hold that the embryo has a limited moral status that is influenced by local ethical and cultural factors. The moral status of the embryo can be evaluated according to its potential value to and relationship with society within the specific ethical and cultural context. On whether the embryo should be used in research, we recommend that researchers follow the principle of permission, i.e., seek consent from the agents who best represent the interests of the embryo (usually the parents).","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48046288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
超人類主義的“人與天一”式審度 超人类主义的“人与天一”式审度
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191952
Wanqiang Zhang
{"title":"超人類主義的“人與天一”式審度","authors":"Wanqiang Zhang","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191952","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191952","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000Professor Wang Jue reflects on transhumanism through the Confucian idea of harmony between man and nature and proposes from a Confucian perspective that we should supervise the formation of our posthuman future. I agree with this suggestion. Here, I discuss transhumanism using Zhuangzi's idea of “Harmony between Man and Nature” and the concept of immortality. My conclusion is that from Zhuangzi's point of view, it would be wrong to use technology solely to plan and control the future of mankind; however, this does not mean that Zhuangzi is an anti-technologist. I think Zhuangzi's ideas offer limited support for the Confucian suggestion that we should supervise the formation of our post-human future.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44442871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
改變“14天規則”：生命倫理學與公眾參與的再平衡 改变“14天规则”：生命伦理学与公众参与的再平衡
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191945
Jian Tang
{"title":"改變“14天規則”：生命倫理學與公眾參與的再平衡","authors":"Jian Tang","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191945","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000This article argues that the ISSCR's changes to the 14-day rule should be welcomed. In the future of human embryo research oversight in China, bioethics and public engagement should be fully balanced. This is essential to safeguard the public's trust in science.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46418428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
生物醫學技術發展應該改變14天法則限制嗎？ 生物医学技术发展应该改变14天法则限制吗？
IF 0.1 4区 哲学
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191949
Hongqi Wang
{"title":"生物醫學技術發展應該改變14天法則限制嗎？","authors":"Hongqi Wang","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191949","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000Developments in research have made culturing human embryos beyond the 14-day limit seem technologically feasible. In the article “Emerging Human Embryo Research Technologies, the 14-day Rule, and the Special Status of the Embryo,” the authors examine a proposal for new human embryo and embryoid research guidelines by reviewing the history of the 14-day limit and emerging areas of research that are impacted by these guidelines. However, as noted by the authors, changes in science policy should not be developed solely by scientists. Instead, policy development should reflect the reality of science as a public endeavor. After 40 years of consensus, any attempts to revoke the 14-day limit on the in vitro culturing of human embryos should rely on public and stakeholder engagement.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43580886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信