International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine最新文献

4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.212656

丹蕾陳, 靜嫻吳

{"title":"中國內地新冠疫情防控新做法的儒家反思","authors":"丹蕾陳, 靜嫻吳","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.212656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.212656","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 2022年底，中國內地政府發佈了一系列政策，完成了新冠疫情防控從以＂政府”為主體的舊做法，到充分發揮＂家庭＋個人”主體作用的新做法的轉變。本文基於“仁愛”、＂公義”、＂誠信”及“和諧”等儒家生命倫理的四項基本原則，立足於防疫做法轉變過程中的行為主體，探討了防疫主體變化背景下的民派生活和健康保障問題、資源與財富分配公正問題、真實可靠資訊獲取問題、費用共擔與資源共用問題。本文認為，＂家庭＋個人＋政府”多主體協作防疫的實現是必然的；相較於防疫舊做法，新的防疫做法更加可持續。當下中國內地亟需加快恢復正常生產生活，緩解防疫主體變化對全社會帶來的＂陣痛”，與此同時總結經驗，為之後可能出現的疫情反復進行提前準備。 In late 2022, the central government of China introduced a series of policies for the mainland as part of a comprehensive transformation of COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention and Control (PPC) from the traditional, government-centered approach to a novel approach that prioritizes individuals and families. Drawing upon the four fundamental principles of Confucian bioethics, namely “benevolence,” “justice,” “integrity,” and “harmony,” this paper examines the ethical challenges of safeguarding lives and health, ensuring a fair distribution of resources and wealth, obtaining accurate and reliable information, and openly sharing the costs and resources throughout this transformation in the PPC approach. By focusing on the key actors involved in the process, we propose that the shift from a government-centric to a collaborative “family + individual + government” approach is both necessary and sustainable. Accordingly, we advocate for accelerating the return to normal production and daily life to mitigate the societal “pain” associated with the transformation. Additionally, we urge the government to reflect on its previous experience and prepare for a possible pandemic recurrence.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135477801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

健康受試者的＂艱難抉擇＂健康受试者的＂艰难抉择＂

4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.212657

嘉琪王, 蕊鄧

{"title":"健康受試者的＂艱難抉擇＂","authors":"嘉琪王, 蕊鄧","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.212657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.212657","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 以新冠疫苗I期試驗的健康受試者為研究對象，基於深度訪談和虛擬民族志研究方法，採用NVivo11軟體進行編碼分析，發現健康受試者的參與動機多為積極動機，在抉擇過程中曾面臨內外矛盾而深陷糾結與掙扎。文章歸納出新冠疫苗受試者抉擇過程不同階段的動機與行為特點，即：萌生想法——躍躍欲試的受試者；進退狐疑——踽踽獨行的受試者；備受煎熬——忐忑不安的受試者；解惑釋疑——篤定前行的受試者。旨在真實地還原健康受試者的抉擇過程，消除社會偏見，為健康受試者和I期試驗去除污名，提升公眾的認知，增强健康受試者的認同感和歸屬感。 Taking the Phase I trial of the 2019-nCoV vaccine as a case study, this paper examines the motivational and psychological development and behavioral patterns of healthy volunteers who participate in different phases of clinical trials for vaccines. The findings of a series of in-depth interviews and virtual ethnographical studies show that participation in a clinical trial such as that for the 2019-nCoV vaccine is a difficult choice for volunteers, as it entails exposure not only to medical risks but also to social prejudice. The paper provides a detailed account of how the volunteers for the Phase I 2019-nCoV vaccine trials made their choice to participate and how they overcame various doubts and fears to serve as responsible research partners.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135477802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

前言：抗疫——在倫理道德上我們還可以做什麼？前言：抗疫——在伦理道德上我们还可以做什么？

4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.212654

穎張

引用次数: 0

重審中醫瘟疫理論在當代疫情危機中的認知價值和倫理效應重审中医瘟疫理论在当代疫情危机中的认知价值和伦理效应

4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.212655

國斌程

{"title":"重審中醫瘟疫理論在當代疫情危機中的認知價值和倫理效應","authors":"國斌程","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.212655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.212655","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 在對中國古代瘟疫理論和公共衛生的研究中，往往認為傳統中醫學的傳染觀念和瘟疫理論不夠＂科學”和＂精准”，在公共衛生和社會防疫等中觀維度上無法發揮積極作用。但中醫學瘟疫理論，將疫情描述為彌漫性環境風險與人類活動相互作用的動態圖景，不僅具有在特定社會歷史環境和時人認知觀念背景下的時代合理性，相較於現代傳染病學＂傳染鏈”的線性分析模型，對當今疫情也能夠給出一個更具整體性的風險認知模型，具有不可替代的價值。更重要的是，古典瘟疫理論有助於打破傳染鏈交織迭加成群體流行的線性思維所帶來的道德難題，為促成全人類肩並肩面對風險、共同承擔責任與持續性協同抗疫的價值目標，提供一個基於中國文化傳統的論證依據。 In the study of concepts developed in the context of public health management in ancient China, the notion of infectiousness and plague theories in TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) are often perceived to have little significance to epidemic prevention and public health today because they are viewed as “unscientific.” This paper, however, argues that the doctrine of yinqi (the epidemic qi) and the concept of infectiousness in TCM present a dynamic interaction between diffuse environmental risks and human activities in a specific spatio-temporal context. The concept of epidemic qi offers a unique cognitive model with which to approach the epidemic risk in a given socio-historical environment that differs from a linear analysis of the “chain of infection” in modern medicine. The paper concludes that the plague theories reflected in TCM are relevant to the contemporary understanding of risk control during a public health crisis.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135477800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

從道德心理學的進路初步探索「限肉令」的正當性從道德心理學的進路初步探索「限肉令」的正當性

4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.212660

家頌楊, 展成錢

{"title":"從道德心理學的進路初步探索「限肉令」的正當性","authors":"家頌楊, 展成錢","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.212660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.212660","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 本文旨在初步探索「限肉令」作為應對傳染病大流行和由工廠化畜牧業帶來的其他威脅的預防措施的正當性。「限肉令」並非指全面禁肉，而是以法律限制市民的人均肉品消耗量在滿足基本營養需求的範圍內。本文採用的進路是緩解一些可能阻礙對此提案進行更宏觀、理性的思考的潛在心理拘繫。此進路參考了福柯「日常經驗」(everyday experience) 的分析，和佛家倫理學回應全球環境倫理問題的策略。我們先以香港社會為主要案例研究，檢視形成「肉是必需的」一想法和嗜肉情結的社會模式。接著我們引入葷食心理學研究，討論嗜肉情結如何成為正面考慮「限肉令」的障礙。我們也嘗試回應一些反對此提案的理由，包括來自自由主義 (Liberalism) 的批評。 This paper explores the preliminary justifiability of a meat restriction order as a preventive measure against the risks of pandemic and other forms of harm posed by factory farming. A meat restriction order seeks to limit citizens’ meat consumption to the level of meeting individuals’ basic nutrient needs. Inspired by Michel Foucault’s analysis of “everyday experience” and Buddhist responses to global environmental issues, the paper investigates the social patterns that account for the formation of people’s meat commitment based on a study of Hong Kong society. The paper also addresses a number of objections to the proposal discussed in the paper, including the critique from liberalism.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135579429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

一個抗疫的分析框架一個抗疫的分析框架

4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.212659

懷宏何

引用次数: 0

COVID-19防控中醫療衛生人員的責任衝突——儒家倫理的視角 COVID-19防控中医疗卫生人员的责任冲突——儒家伦理的视角

4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.212658

廣寬謝

引用次数: 0

善治視角下的人類胚胎研究政策的制訂善治視角下的人類胚胎研究政策的制訂

IF 0.1 4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191948

Y. Nie

{"title":"善治視角下的人類胚胎研究政策的制訂","authors":"Y. Nie","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191948","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \u0000人類胚胎研究的“十四天規則”作為一條重要的倫理原則已實施四十餘年，被很多國家立法採納。近年來，隨著胚胎技術的飛速發展，科學家們對“十四天規則”提出了新的挑戰，也是對相關的倫理研究和公共政策的制訂提出的挑戰，即我們該怎樣看待人類胚胎研究的公共政策？Ana S litis等在〈新興人體胚胎研究技術、十四天規則和胚胎的特殊地位〉（馬修斯、洛伊、伊爾蒂斯2021）一文中鼓勵科學家從促進善治的角度來看待人類胚胎和胚狀體的研究政策，但並未深入探討其原因和意義，本文主要從善治的特徵出發通過對人類胚胎研究政策制訂中如何實現的探討而對該文的上述核心觀點進行回應。 \u0000In the article “Emerging Human Embryo Research Technologies, the 14-day Rule, and the Special Status of the Embryo,” one of the authors' core aims is to encourage scientists to look at human embryo research policy from the perspective of promoting good governance. Starting with the characteristics of good governance, this paper responds to Iltis et al. by discussing how to realize good governance in the formulation of human embryo research policy.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42941105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

新興人體胚胎研究技術、十四天規則和胚胎的特殊地位新兴人体胚胎研究技术、十四天规则和胚胎的特殊地位

IF 0.1 4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191941

K. Matthews, Sam Lowe, A. Iltis

{"title":"新興人體胚胎研究技術、十四天規則和胚胎的特殊地位","authors":"K. Matthews, Sam Lowe, A. Iltis","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191941","url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in English ; abstract also in Chinese.\u0000胚胎研究的＂十四天規則＂已經在國際上實施了幾十年。當前，很多科學家正在挑戰這一限制，因為技術進步使得人類胚胎和胚胎的細胞模型可以培養到其早期發育階段的後期。一些學者質疑人們長期以來持有的胚胎研究應該受到限制的信念，即超過十四天的胚胎研究是不道德的，他們開始提出替代性指導方針。本文通過回顧“十四天規則”的歷史和受這一規則影響的新興研究領域的情況，審查一項新的關於人類胚胎和類胚胎的指南。我們表明社會和政治哲學、形而上學和倫理學所關注的問題對於解釋和應用新的建議或開發替代方案具有核心作用。至關重要的是，科學家在突破十四天的限制去做任何研究之前，應該制訂明確的、深思熟慮的、且有文化敏感性的指導方針，包括具體限制和監督程式，以確保科學能夠適當地回應社會的需求和價值判斷。\u0000After 40 years of abiding by an international guideline that barred human embryo research beyond day 14 of embryonic development, many scientists are now challenging this limit due to technological advances suggesting that embryos and cell-based models of embryos can be cultured to later points in early development. Some scholars have questioned the long-held belief that research beyond 14 days is unethical and have begun proposing alternative guidelines for research. In this paper, we examine a proposal for new human embryo and embryoid guidelines by reviewing the history of the 14-day limit and emerging areas of research that are impacted by these guidelines. We then show how social and political philosophy, metaphysics, and ethics are central to interpreting and applying these new recommendations or developing alternatives. Before conducting any research beyond day 14, scientists must develop clear, thoughtful, and culturally sensitive guidelines that include limitations and oversight procedures to ensure that science responds to societal needs and values.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47684439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

沒有民主治理原則的廣泛公眾支持：批判性回應没有民主治理原则的广泛公众支持：批判性响应

IF 0.1 4区哲学

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.24112/ijccpm.191950

Man-To Tang

引用次数: 0