前言：科技興趣、超越人類與倫理限制

IF 0.1 4区哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI:10.24112/ijccpm.191939

Yu-hong Cai, R. Fan

{"title":"前言：科技興趣、超越人類與倫理限制","authors":"Yu-hong Cai, R. Fan","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \n人類正處於前所未有的技術高速發展時代。特別是，NBIC技術（納米技術、生物技術、資訊技術和認知科學）彙集起來的發展，使得人類改造自身、進而超越自身的夢想不斷接近現實，但也為我們敲響了倫理學的警鐘：如果我們對生命技術的不斷突破和廣泛應用所牽涉的倫理價值缺乏充分的考量並施以必要的限制，那麼技術就無法得到有利的發展和公平的應用，甚至造成過分追求那些具有不可逆結果或不可逆傷害的生命技術的後果，使得現代生物醫學成為人類幸福的一種“錯誤承諾”。本期的兩篇主題論文以及十六篇評論文章，正是著力於探討這些影響深遠的生命倫理問題。 \nThis issue of the journal contains two thematic papers, namely “Emerging Human Embryo Research Technologies, the 14-day Rule, and the Special Status of the Embryo” by Kirstin R. W. Matthews, Sam Lowe, and Ana S. Iltis, and “A Confucian Reflection on Transhumanism: How to Regulate Our Posthuman Future?” by Wang Jue, in addition to 16 commentary essays on ethical issues associated with rapidly developing biomedical technologies. The authors argue that scientific interests should not be the main driver of technological breakthroughs and applications. Rather, ethical commitments embedded in cultural traditions should play a positive role through public participation in legitimate policymaking.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 人類正處於前所未有的技術高速發展時代。特別是，NBIC技術（納米技術、生物技術、資訊技術和認知科學）彙集起來的發展，使得人類改造自身、進而超越自身的夢想不斷接近現實，但也為我們敲響了倫理學的警鐘：如果我們對生命技術的不斷突破和廣泛應用所牽涉的倫理價值缺乏充分的考量並施以必要的限制，那麼技術就無法得到有利的發展和公平的應用，甚至造成過分追求那些具有不可逆結果或不可逆傷害的生命技術的後果，使得現代生物醫學成為人類幸福的一種“錯誤承諾”。本期的兩篇主題論文以及十六篇評論文章，正是著力於探討這些影響深遠的生命倫理問題。 This issue of the journal contains two thematic papers, namely “Emerging Human Embryo Research Technologies, the 14-day Rule, and the Special Status of the Embryo” by Kirstin R. W. Matthews, Sam Lowe, and Ana S. Iltis, and “A Confucian Reflection on Transhumanism: How to Regulate Our Posthuman Future?” by Wang Jue, in addition to 16 commentary essays on ethical issues associated with rapidly developing biomedical technologies. The authors argue that scientific interests should not be the main driver of technological breakthroughs and applications. Rather, ethical commitments embedded in cultural traditions should play a positive role through public participation in legitimate policymaking.

查看原文本刊更多论文

前言：科技兴趣、超越人类与伦理限制

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 人类正处于前所未有的技术高速发展时代。特别是，NBIC技术（纳米技术、生物技术、资讯技术和认知科学）汇集起来的发展，使得人类改造自身、进而超越自身的梦想不断接近现实，但也为我们敲响了伦理学的警钟：如果我们对生命技术的不断突破和广泛应用所牵涉的伦理价值缺乏充分的考量并施以必要的限制，那么技术就无法得到有利的发展和公平的应用，甚至造成过分追求那些具有不可逆结果或不可逆伤害的生命技术的后果，使得现代生物医学成为人类幸福的一种“错误承诺”。本期的两篇主题论文以及十六篇评论文章，正是著力于探讨这些影响深远的生命伦理问题。 This issue of the journal contains two thematic papers, namely “Emerging Human Embryo Research Technologies, the 14-day Rule, and the Special Status of the Embryo” by Kirstin R. W. Matthews, Sam Lowe, and Ana S. Iltis, and “A Confucian Reflection on Transhumanism: How to Regulate Our Posthuman Future?” by Wang Jue, in addition to 16 commentary essays on ethical issues associated with rapidly developing biomedical technologies. The authors argue that scientific interests should not be the main driver of technological breakthroughs and applications. Rather, ethical commitments embedded in cultural traditions should play a positive role through public participation in legitimate policymaking.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

自引率

0.00%

发文量