{"title":"形容词并列短语对其关联词的选择","authors":"C. Wu, Lawrence Yam-Leung Cheung","doi":"10.1075/ijchl.00017.wu","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00017.wu","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000汉语形容词并列短语中可用的关联词有很多,如“而”“又”“和”“又…又…”等等,讲话人何时且为何选择某种关联词就成了一大问题。本研究意在总结限制关联词选择的相关因素,并分析它们的影响力大小。基于900条取自北京大学语料库的相关语料,本文选定前人提出的7个限制因素为自变量,6个最常用的关联词为因变量,建立多项式逻辑回归模型,发现形容词并列短语对于关联词的选择是多因素共同作用的结果,总结出了6个限制关联词选择的自变量,按次序分别是:句法位置、音节数量、语义关系、修饰成分、语体、并列项数量,其中“句法位置”和“音节数量”的作用最大。","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":"155 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138998144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The ho-V construction in Taiwanese Southern Min and the degree-introducing morpheme\u0000 ho and u","authors":"Chen-Sheng Luther Liu","doi":"10.1075/ijchl.00014.liu","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00014.liu","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this study, I first provide an in-depth study on the TSM ho-V construction with a monosyllabic\u0000 V, especially on the morpho-syntactic function and the degree-introducing function of the morpheme ho\u0000 ‘hoVD’. Then, based on Liu’s (2020) study on the TSM\u0000 u-V construction, I comprehensively compare these two constructions, which reaches two major points. First, the\u0000 ho-V sequence and the u-V sequence are intransitive compound verb. The V that\u0000 u ‘uVD’ merges with can be a lexical verb or an aspectual verb; however, the V that\u0000 ho ‘hoVD’ merges with must be a lexical verb. When forming a compound verb with a lexical verb,\u0000 u ‘uVD’ has the same morpho-syntactic function as ho ‘hoVD’. Second,\u0000 these two morphemes differ in how to introduce the degree meaning for their corresponding construction. Namely, the dimension of\u0000 measurement carried by the measure function introduced by u ‘uVD’ is determined by what is measured;\u0000 however, the morpheme ho ‘hoVD’ intrinsically carries a dimension of measurement. Depending on what\u0000 the morpheme ho ‘hoVD’ modifies is the entity denoted by the subject in question or the eventuality\u0000 argument of V, the dimension of measurement carried by it can be interpreted as ‘be good for one to V’ or ‘it is easy for one to\u0000 V’.","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138999285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}