Studia Litterarum最新文献_第5页

Arnold Böcklin’s Pictorial Motifs in the Poetry of Russian Modernism 阿诺德Böcklin俄国现代主义诗歌中的图案母题

IF 0.1

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-238-275

E. V. Kuznetsova

{"title":"Arnold Böcklin’s Pictorial Motifs in the Poetry of Russian Modernism","authors":"E. V. Kuznetsova","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-238-275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-238-275","url":null,"abstract":"The work of the Swiss artist Arnold Böklin (1827–1901) is a bright page of European culture. His painting “Island of the Dead” for several decades in the early 20th century was a favorite canvas of the Russian intelligentsia. The article attempts to consider the evolution of the perception of Böklin’s painting in the era of Russian Art Nouveau in poetry, criticism and public consciousness. The main material of the study is the lyrics of K. Fofanov, A. Fedorov, N. Klyuev, I. Bunin, Andrei Bely, I. Ehrenburg, Sasha Cherny, I. Savin and A. Tarkovsky. Fofanov and Klyuev saw in the painting of the artist a deep reflection of their thoughts about the succession of birth and death in the life of each person and in the fate of all mankind. Fedorov turns to the images of Böklin to create his own version of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice. Bunin was attracted by the lyrics of nature, mood landscapes expressing the eternal beauty of the universe. Andrei Bely was interested in Böklin’s experiments in pictorial mythopoetics related to his own searches. In the poetry of I. Savin and Tarkovsky’s “Island of the Dead” changes its symbolic content: from a symbol of the greatness of death, it becomes a sad monument to Russian pre-revolutionary life, washed away by a wave of historical cataclysms.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89577352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Nikolay Soloviev as a Criticm of Chernyshevsky’s Aesthetic Theory 索洛维耶夫对车尔尼雪夫斯基美学理论的批判

IF 0.1

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-46-63

V. Shcherbakov

{"title":"Nikolay Soloviev as a Criticm of Chernyshevsky’s Aesthetic Theory","authors":"V. Shcherbakov","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-46-63","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-46-63","url":null,"abstract":"Dissertation of Nikolay Chernyshevsky “The Aesthetic Relationship of Art to Reality” (1855) is one of the most controversial works in the history of humanitarian sciences. Even during the author’s life, it was estimated ambiguous (and also sharply negative). Among the early responses to this work, a prominent place is occupied by the critical cycle of Nikolay Ivanovich Solovyov (1831–1874) “The Art Issue” (1865). The critic analyzes Chernyshevsky’s concepts of the beautiful, the sublime, the tragic and comes to the conclusion that his definitions are untenable. Solovyov also finds little solidity in Chernyshevsky’s judgments about certain kinds of art, noting this tendency to emphasize the imperfection of artistic works in comparison with nature. Solovyov’s main conclusions are as follows: Chernyshevsky’s “theory of reproduction” is an attempt to revive the theory of imitation of nature, while the appearance of novelty is created by pointing to “real direction of thoughts” of the author Chernyshevsky very vaguely characterizes the beautiful; grossly simplifies the tasks of art (“reproduction”); discredits the creative imagination and the artist’s craving for the ideal; seeks to lower the high status of art in the range of human interests. Solovyov’s analysis is distinguished by consistency, respect for the convictions of his opponent, as well as his own view of the issues raised by Chernyshevsky. In “The Art Issue” and other articles Solovyov defended his belief that Chernyshevsky’s “theory of reproduction” was the prototype of the utilitarian and nihilistic views on art in journalism of the 1860s. This article presents for the first time a detailed analysis of Nikolay Solovyov’ s views on art in comparison with Chernyshevsky’s aesthetic theory.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90512602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“Intertextuality” in the 12th Century: Marie de France and Chrétien de Troyes 12世纪的“互文性”:玛丽·德·弗朗斯和克拉西提恩·德·特鲁瓦

IF 0.1

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-2-46-67

N. Dolgorukova

引用次数: 0

Two Wings of Art Writing 艺术写作的两翼

IF 0.1

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-10-45

V. Tiupa

{"title":"Two Wings of Art Writing","authors":"V. Tiupa","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-10-45","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-10-45","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the correlation between aesthetic and rhetorical aspects of artistic writing in a historical perspective. Before the “aesthetic revolution” of the 18th century, which was marked with the publication of Baumgarten’s Aestheticism, written language, while possessing an essentially creative potential, was conceived purely rhetorically, not as the creation of conditional holistic worlds, but as a textforming craft of a special kind. The discovery of the creative nature of art served as a powerful impulse for its development and shaped classical European artistry. A mental crisis of artistic culture at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries resulted in an imbalance between the aesthetic and rhetorical vectors of artistic writing. Avant-garde provocation, political engagement, and consumer fiction depreciated the aesthetic component of art from various angles. The critical discord between de-aestheticization of artistic writing and the rehabilitation of its aesthetic value was embedded in the formation of a theory of literature as a science, which took place in the polemic between “aesthetics of verbal creativity” by M.M. Bakhtin and purely rhetorical poetics of the formal school. This confrontation, which gave rise, in particular, to the phenomenon of “postmodernism,” continues to this day. It is in this confrontation that the fate of literature as an art of the word is decided.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77876574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“You Have a Lot of Soul, This Is the Main Thing for Creativity.” The Correspondence between Ivan Shmelyov and Leonid Zurov (1928–1929) “你有很多灵魂，这是创造力的主要内容。”什梅廖夫与祖罗夫的通信(1928-1929)

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-256-279

Alexei M. Lyubomudrov

{"title":"“You Have a Lot of Soul, This Is the Main Thing for Creativity.” The Correspondence between Ivan Shmelyov and Leonid Zurov (1928–1929)","authors":"Alexei M. Lyubomudrov","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-256-279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-256-279","url":null,"abstract":"For the first time the article introduces а correspondence between the writers of the Russian Diaspora Ivan Shmelyov and Leonid Zurov into a scientific circulation. Shmelyov’s letters contain some characteristics of the first books of the young writer and his artistic talent as well as outlines the prospects for a further creative path. Shmelyov turns his attention mainly to the inner world and personality of the writer. He advises Zurov to engage in self-education, get acquainted with Russian and European philosophy, develop his artistic word. The letters allow to see Shmelyov’s active care, which revealed in his initiative for publishing Zurov’s works in Paris periodicals, promoting the positive critics responses (reviews by V. Amphiteatrov and K. Zaitsev), and supporting Zurov’s decision to move from Riga to France. Some letters concern the episode with removing of the Zurov’s short story from the newspaper “Russkiy Invalid.” Sincere and warm Zurov’s letters reveal the details of his life in Riga. They also talk about his travelling around Latgale, which served as a source of his creative inspiration. The published correspondence, thus, introduces new nuances in the biographies of two bright creative personalities of the Russian emigration.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"319 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135355968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Some Issues of Commenting Ivan Bunin’s Early Stories of 1887–1902 评伊万·布宁1887-1902年早期小说的几个问题

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-194-213

Sergey N. Morozov

{"title":"Some Issues of Commenting Ivan Bunin’s Early Stories of 1887–1902","authors":"Sergey N. Morozov","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-194-213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-194-213","url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the principles and methods of commenting Ivan Bunin’s early fiction prose. It is pointed out that research into the type and level of completeness of scholarly commentaries on works of classics of Russian literature has been conducted for almost a century. The structure of the commentary in academic collections of Russian writers’ works is presented. The article offers a methodology of writing a commentary on the early literary prose of Ivan Bunin, while exploring the problems and questions that arise in the commentaries on the writer’s prose written for the future academic Complete Works and Letters by Ivan Bunin, the work on which has already begun. The principles of writing each section of the commentary for this scholarly edition of Bunin’s literary heritage are outlined: textual, historical-literary, and realhistorical ones. The latter section is presented in a more detailed structure of seven paragraphs. For each item, the paper provides several examples of commentary on specific realities from Bunin’s early stories. A separate section is devoted to linguistic commentary, for which several examples of commentary on particular regional words and folk expressions are also given. Thus, the commentary on Bunin’s prose should be comprehensive, combining with the greatest possible completeness all the necessary information about each work.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135356124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Esenin’s Poem “Us”: Materials for Historical and Literary Commentary 叶谢宁诗歌《我们》:历史与文学评论的材料

IF 0.1

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-2-162-181

Maxim V. Skorokhodov

引用次数: 0

Evolution of Female Images in the I.A. Grinevskaya’s Works of the 1890s–1900s. 格里涅夫斯卡娅1890 - 1900年代作品中女性形象的演变

IF 0.1

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-2-140-161

K. Sarycheva

引用次数: 0

Literary Circle of the Poet I.A. Bunin in 1895–1900 1895-1900年诗人布宁的文学圈

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-126-147

Tatiana M. Dvinyatina

{"title":"Literary Circle of the Poet I.A. Bunin in 1895–1900","authors":"Tatiana M. Dvinyatina","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-126-147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-126-147","url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the history of the formation of Ivan Bunin’s poetic circle during the first years of his metropolitan literary career: from his first visit to Moscow in early 1895 to the time when he was preparing his key collection of poems, “Autumn” (1901). Those were the years when Bunin established contacts with the senior symbolists Konstantin Balmont and Valeriy Bryusov, made the acquaintance of Chekhov and Gorky and became friends with Aleksander Fedorov, Aleksander Kuprin and the members of the Fellowship of South Russian Artists, some of whom influenced the young Bunin’s literary work. By the beginning of the 1900s Bunin had formed links which subsequently strengthened with the Moscow Literary Circle, which included poets and writers from various movements, and the “Parnasus” association, which from 1899 was renamed “Wednesday” and included poets and writers of a non-symbolist tendency, among whom Bunin’s literary biography moved forward. Particular attention is paid in the article to the mutual influence between and textual echoes in Bunin’s poems and those of symbolists, which have to be taken into consideration in the scholarly annotations to the recently launched first complete edition of Bunin’s works.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135356440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Manuscript Variation in “Hervarar Saga ok Heiðreks Konungs” 《Hervarar Saga ok heikreks Konungs》手稿变体

IF 0.1

Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-1-88-109

Inna G. Matyushina

引用次数: 0