Philosophical Readings最新文献

{"title":"Why Matters Matter","authors":"M. Ferraris","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.34505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.34505","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"1 1","pages":"4-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71076250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Das höchste Gut: Kants Eudämonismus unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Jahre 1781-85","authors":"E. Oggionni","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.34558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.34558","url":null,"abstract":"ants Lehre des höchsten Guts ist von mehreren Interpreten als eudämonistisch und heteronom kritisiert worden, z. B. von Arthur Schopenhauer und Hermann Cohen. In der folgenden Abhandlung gehe ich davon aus, dass Kant zwischen Eudämonismus und Heteronomie unterscheidet und die beiden Kritikpunkte daher getrennt analysiert werden müssen. Dementsprechend wird im ersten Teil des Aufsatzes gezeigt, dass und in welchem Sinne die weitverbreitete Kritik an Kants Lehre des höchsten Guts nur das Problem der Heteronomie betrifft. Die von der Kritik gegen Kants Ethik erhobene Beschuldigung der Heteronomie wird im zweiten Teil des Aufsatzes genauer untersucht, indem zwei ihrer Hauptargumente herausgegriffen werden. Zum einen wird der Einwand vorgestellt, Kant sei insofern inkonsistent, als er erstens behauptet, die Folgen einer Handlung seinen moralisch irrelevant, und zweitens, die Hervorbrin 1 Siehe darüber z. B. Marc Zobrist, „Kants Lehre vom höchsten Gut und die Frage moralischer Motivationˮ, in Kant-Studien, 99.3 (2008), 285-311. gung des höchsten Guts sei a priori (moralisch) notwendig. Zum anderen wird auf den noch weiter gehenden Einwand eingegangen, der behauptet, eine Erklärung für das proportionale Verhältnis von Tugend und Glückseligkeit als Verdienst für die Tugend könne gar nicht gefunden werden, weil in Kants Bestimmung von Tugend und Moralität die Handlungskonsequenzen (wie z. B. die Glückseligkeit) nicht inbegriffen seien. Als Antwort auf die analysierte Kritik stellt der dritte Teil des Aufsatzes eine Interpretation der kantischen Ethik auf der Grundlage der Schriften und Vorlesungsnotizen aus den Jahren 1781 bis 1785 vor. Anhand der genannten Werke kann man zeigen, dass das kantische höchste Gut sowohl mit der kritischen Idee Gottes als auch mit dem moralischen Gesetz und mit der intelligiblen Welt übereinstimmt. Der dritte Teil des Aufsatzes wird deshalb aufzeigen, inwiefern Kants Lehre der moralischen Motivation und seine Grundlegung der Ethik im Wesentlichen zusammenfallen. Der vierte und letzte Teil des Aufsatzes untersucht Epikur und die Stoiker als ideengeschichtliche Quellen der kantischen Ethik und rekonstruiert schließlich ‒ provokativ formuliert ‒ Kants Eudämonismus.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"6 1","pages":"76-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71077095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Schiller, Hume und die Religionspsychologie. Zu dem Gedicht Resignation und dem Bücherbestand der Karlsschule zu Schillers Schulzeit","authors":"Cordula Burtscher","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35545","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35545","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"5 1","pages":"50-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71078619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Schiller's Philosophical Letters: Naturalising Spirit to Moralise Nature","authors":"Katerina Deligiorgi","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35546","url":null,"abstract":"The Philosophical letters is a short piece that Schiller composed in the early eighties and published in the Thalia in 1786. Despite its title, the work has received little attention from philosophers. My aim in this paper is to show that if we read the Letters with the Dissertation in view, we can get an interesting perspective on the moral motivation for Schiller’s interactionism in these early works that touches on certain unresolved problems also in the later works.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"5 1","pages":"63-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71078669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Review of E. Acosta, Schiller versus Fichte. Schillers Begriff der Person in der Zeit und Fichtes Kategorie des Wechselbestimmung im Widerstreit, Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi, 2011, 302 pp. by E. Magrì","authors":"E. Magrì","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35553","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"1 1","pages":"223-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71079290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rede über die Frage: Gehört allzuviel Güte, Leutseeligkeit und grosse Freygebigkeit im engsten Verstande zur Tugend? Socrates as Secular Jesus in Schiller’s First Karlsschule Speech","authors":"Jeffrey L. High","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35544","url":null,"abstract":"∗ My most sincere thanks to Sophia Clark, Colleen Brown (California State University Long Beach), Lisa Beesley (Vanderbilt University), and Henrik Sponsel (University of California, Irvine) for their research support and help in preparing this manuscript. 1 Moses Mendelssohn calls Socrates “Weltburger” in his “Leben und Charakter des Sokrates” (1767). Moses Mendelssohn, Phadon oder uber die Unsterblichkeit der Seele, ed. David Friedlander, fifth edition (Berlin: Nicolai, 1814) 9. In his “Ankundigung der Rheinischen Thalia” (Announcement of the Journal Rheinische Thalia) of 11 November 1784, Schiller declares: “Ich schreibe als Weltburger, der keinem Fursten dient” (I write as a citizen of the world, who serves no prince; NA 22:93). The term “Weltburger” was by no means uncommon in the second half of the eighteenth century (see NA 23:274) and Kant had recently used the phrase “weltburgerliche Absicht” in his February 1784 essay “Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltburgerlicher Absicht,” which Schiller did not actu You are of this world; I am not of this world. — Jesus Christ (John 8:23; 1st century AD)","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"5 1","pages":"7-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71079014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Poesie als Spiel. Der Klassiker Schiller (Wallenstein und Die Braut von Messina)","authors":"N. Oellers","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35552","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"99 1","pages":"213-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71079165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"L’individualità universale. Soggettività e poesia in Schiller a partire dalla Bürger- e dalla Matthisson-Rezension","authors":"G. Pinna","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35548","url":null,"abstract":"1 La recensione apparve anonima nella “Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung” il 15 e il 17 gennaio 1791, suscitando diverse reazioni, tra cui quella estremamente irritata dello stesso Bürger, che in un primo momento non voleva credere che l’autore fosse Schiller e reagì con una Antikritik. A questa Schiller rispose a sua volta con una Verteidigung des Rezensenten (“Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung”, 6.4.1791), in cui ribadiva ed articolava ulteriormente i principi su cui basava la propria analisi, cfr. Über Bürgers Gedichte; Verteidigung des Rezensenten gegen obige Antikritik, in F. Schiller, Werke. Nationalausgabe, inziata da J. Petersen, proseguita da L. v. Blumenthal, Benno v. Wiese e N. Oellers, edita su incarico della Stiftung Weimarer Klassik e dello Schiller-Nationalmuseum Marbach, Weimar, Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1943 ff., vol. XXII, p. 245-264 (d’ora in avanti NA, seguito dall’indicazione del volume e del numero di pagina). Matthisson – in alcuni passaggi dello scritto Über naive und sentimentalische Dichtung e, in misura non trascurabile, nell’epistolario. La diversità dei contesti dà di per sé indicazioni sulla non omogeneità degli assunti problematici e delle intenzioni teoriche. In Über naive und sentimentalische Dichtung – l’ultimo dei grandi saggi del periodo kantiano – Schiller affronta la questione delle forme della poesia moderna nel quadro della discussione sulle caratteristiche storico-antropologiche di una cultura sentimentale ovvero della riflessione, in cui il poeta deve farsi tramite degli sviluppi della cultura intellettuale del suo tempo. Il discorso è qui incentrato sul soggetto della creazione poetica e sulla conseguente definizione delle forme letterarie sulla base dei “modi di sentire” (Empfindungsweisen), che per il poeta moderno presuppongono la coscienza dell’avvenuta scissione tra uomo e natura. In una tale prospettiva Schiller abbozza una teoria che potremmo dire speculativa dei generi letterari fondata sull’idea del ritorno dialettico della natura perduta. Nel caso delle due recensioni, scritte rispettivamente nel 1791 e nel 1794, cui bisogna aggiungere la risposta di Schiller alla reazione dello stesso Bürger, l’analisi critica dei testi poetici è preceduta da una vera e propria teoria della poesia. Il grande rilievo che assume nelle recensioni schilleriane","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"1 1","pages":"103-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71078686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Review of Y. Nilges, Schiller und das Recht, Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2012, 399 pp. by L. A. Macor","authors":"L. Macor","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35555","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"5 1","pages":"228-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71079529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"On the Sublime and Schiller’s Theory of Tragedy","authors":"R. Robertson","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.35551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.35551","url":null,"abstract":"he essay ‘On the Sublime’ forms an essential part of Schiller’s theory of tragedy, which has recently been called a major philosophical contribution to the subject, ranking alongside those made by Hegel or Nietzsche. Schiller’s mature ideas about tragedy are set out in a number of essays written between his abandonment of the theatre (after Don Carlos, completed in 1787) and his resumption of dramatic writing with Wallenstein (written between 1797 and 1799). Of these essays, those dealing most directly and extensively with tragedy are ‘On the Basis of Pleasure in Tragic Subjects’ (‘Uber den Grund des Vergnugens an tragischen Gegenstanden’, written in 1791) and ‘On the Pathetic’ (‘Uber das Pathetische’, written and published in 1793). ‘On the Sublime’ was written later than these essays, probably some time after the great treatise ‘On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters’ (‘Uber die asthetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen’, published 1795), since in","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"43 1","pages":"194-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71078849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}