Journal of Southeast Asian History最新文献_第6页

The Transition to Guided Democracy: Indonesian Politics, 1957–59 . By Daniel S. Lev. Modern Indonesia Project, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 1966. Pp. iii, 298. Appendix. Price US$3.50. 向引导民主过渡:1957 - 1959年的印尼政治。丹尼尔·s·列夫著。现代印度尼西亚项目，康奈尔大学，伊萨卡，纽约，1966。第三页，298页。合同附件。价格3.50美元。

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100004774

J. Mackie

引用次数: 42

Giovanni de' Marignolli: An Italian Prelate at the Court of the South-East Asian Queen of Sheba Giovanni de' Marignolli:东南亚示巴女王宫廷的意大利主教

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100004737

B. Colless

引用次数: 2

Philippine-Japanese Professorial Exchanges in the 1930's 20世纪30年代的菲律宾-日本教授交流

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100004683

G. Goodman

引用次数: 1

Colonies into Commonwealth. By W. D. McIntyre. Blandford Press, London 1966. Pp. xii, 391. Illustrations, Maps and Index. Price UK 37s 6d. 殖民地变成了联邦。w·d·麦金太尔著。布兰福德出版社，伦敦，1966。第十二页，391页。插图，地图和索引。价格37s 6d。

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100004920

Dennis Taylor

引用次数: 0

The Southeast Asian City . By T. G. McGee. G. Bell and Sons, Ltd., London 1967. Pp. 204. Tables, Figures, Plates, Notes, Bibliography, and Index. Price 30s. 东南亚城市 .作者：T. G. McGee。G. Bell and Sons, Ltd., 伦敦，1967 年。共 204 页。表、图、板画、注释、参考书目和索引。售价 30 美元。

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100004853

D. W. Fryer

引用次数: 0

The Southeast Asian World. By Keith Buchanan. G. Bell and Sons, Ltd., London 1907. Pp. 176. Maps and Cartograms, Plates, Selected Bibliography, and Index. Price 27s 6d.

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100004841

D. W. Fryer

引用次数: 0

The Eurasians of Indonesia: A Problem and Challenge in Colonial History 印度尼西亚的欧亚人:殖民史上的问题与挑战

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S021778110000466X

P. V. D. Veur

{"title":"The Eurasians of Indonesia: A Problem and Challenge in Colonial History","authors":"P. V. D. Veur","doi":"10.1017/S021778110000466X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S021778110000466X","url":null,"abstract":"Persons of mixed European and Asian parentage appeared in the Indonesian archipelago shortly after the arrival of the first “Westerners” in the sixteenth century. Although most of them were absorbed by the indigenous population, some were not and came to constitute a separate, identifiable group. The main reason, apart from paternal pride, seems to have been religious. Christianity, especially during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, encouraged a strong feeling of responsibility toward the biracial offspring of non-European women. A moral obligation was felt to baptize the child and give it the name of the father. Legal rules and regulations facilitated the process: the European father, for example, could “recognize” his natural child by a non-European woman, adopt it, or request a “Letter of legitimation”. Possession of “the status of European” in the nineteenth century permitted persons of mixed descent to benefit educationally from the rapid expansion of “European” (i.e. Dutch) schools. Finally, the Dutch nationality law of 1892 — based squarely on the jus sanguinis principle — contained the crucial provision that all those who were considered Europeans when the act came into force (July 1, 1893) — including those who were legally assimilated and socially a part of the European group — became Dutch citizens.","PeriodicalId":376418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian History","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1968-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126814712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

The Struggle for the Mekong Banks 1892–1896 湄公河两岸的斗争(1892-1896

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100003604

C. Hirshfield

引用次数: 6

British Expansion in Malaya, 1897–1902 英国在马来亚的扩张(1897-1902

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100003616

I. Klein

{"title":"British Expansion in Malaya, 1897–1902","authors":"I. Klein","doi":"10.1017/S0217781100003616","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0217781100003616","url":null,"abstract":"Was British expansion in Malaya the unitary expression of an implacable imperialism, in which gradually but inexorably British economic and political enterprise gained indirect hegemony and then unequivocal rule; in which, by friendship and guile, power and diplomacy, Malay chiefs and populace were controlled, Siamese authority negated, and European rivals bested? There was at Whitehall a steady interest in the late nineteenth century by Salisbury, Balfour, Chamberlain and others in furthering British control in Malaya. But the strategy of expansion, ardently pushed by Straits Settlements officials during the period of ‘High Imperialism’ in the late nineteenth century was checked by other imperatives of British imperialism in Asia. The British were reluctant to take any step in Malaya which, by offending and weakening the Siamese, would encourage French expansion in eastern Siam. Further, the Indian Government, the trustee of British military power in Asia, was unwilling to commit large resources to Southeast Asia which might have been required to combat Russia on India's northwest threshold. These factors limited a British forward movement in Malaya. At times, however, British expansionary fervour did burst stridently upon Malays and Siamese. In 1902 the British wrested concessions from Siam which allowed the placement of British ‘advisers’ in Kelantan and Trengganu, and by which Siam abandoned all prerogatives of interfering with these states' internal affairs. This study is directed to comprehension of the strategy of British expansion in Malaya, particularly of British efforts to sequester control of economic concessions and privileges in Kelantan and Trengganu, and the significance of these manoeuvres in preparing for the transfer of Kelantan, Trengganu, Kedah and Perlis from Siam to Britain in March, 1909.","PeriodicalId":376418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian History","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1968-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126126449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Continuity and Change in the International History of Maritime South East Asia 东南亚海上国际历史的延续与变迁

Journal of Southeast Asian History Pub Date : 1968-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0217781100003586

C. Cowan

{"title":"Continuity and Change in the International History of Maritime South East Asia","authors":"C. Cowan","doi":"10.1017/S0217781100003586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0217781100003586","url":null,"abstract":"That view of the history of maritime South East Asia which fixed a rigid dividing line in 1511 or 1600, and regarded the assertion of European dominance in the area as marking the frontier between traditional and modern history, has long ago been discredited and discarded. It led to the treatment of the earlier history of Malaya and Indonesia as a mere prelude to the coming of the Europeans, or at least as an era without relevance to later events, to which special criteria must be applied. The later history was treated predominantly as the story of European activities and rivalries, and purely western criteria were applied even to indigenous themes. All this is now regarded as unscientific, and labelled ‘Europe-centric’. Few, if any, contemporary historians would challenge this judgment so far as the internal history of Malaya and Indonesia and their component parts are concerned, and, though there is still ample room for discussion as to its application in practice, this paper does not seek to re-open the debate. It is concerned not so much with the development of maritime South East Asian society, or with the history of individual states within what are now Malaysia and Indonesia, as with the relations of these states with each other.","PeriodicalId":376418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian History","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1968-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125523625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11