British Expansion in Malaya, 1897–1902

I. Klein
{"title":"British Expansion in Malaya, 1897–1902","authors":"I. Klein","doi":"10.1017/S0217781100003616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Was British expansion in Malaya the unitary expression of an implacable imperialism, in which gradually but inexorably British economic and political enterprise gained indirect hegemony and then unequivocal rule; in which, by friendship and guile, power and diplomacy, Malay chiefs and populace were controlled, Siamese authority negated, and European rivals bested? There was at Whitehall a steady interest in the late nineteenth century by Salisbury, Balfour, Chamberlain and others in furthering British control in Malaya. But the strategy of expansion, ardently pushed by Straits Settlements officials during the period of ‘High Imperialism’ in the late nineteenth century was checked by other imperatives of British imperialism in Asia. The British were reluctant to take any step in Malaya which, by offending and weakening the Siamese, would encourage French expansion in eastern Siam. Further, the Indian Government, the trustee of British military power in Asia, was unwilling to commit large resources to Southeast Asia which might have been required to combat Russia on India's northwest threshold. These factors limited a British forward movement in Malaya. At times, however, British expansionary fervour did burst stridently upon Malays and Siamese. In 1902 the British wrested concessions from Siam which allowed the placement of British ‘advisers’ in Kelantan and Trengganu, and by which Siam abandoned all prerogatives of interfering with these states' internal affairs. This study is directed to comprehension of the strategy of British expansion in Malaya, particularly of British efforts to sequester control of economic concessions and privileges in Kelantan and Trengganu, and the significance of these manoeuvres in preparing for the transfer of Kelantan, Trengganu, Kedah and Perlis from Siam to Britain in March, 1909.","PeriodicalId":376418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian History","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1968-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0217781100003616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Was British expansion in Malaya the unitary expression of an implacable imperialism, in which gradually but inexorably British economic and political enterprise gained indirect hegemony and then unequivocal rule; in which, by friendship and guile, power and diplomacy, Malay chiefs and populace were controlled, Siamese authority negated, and European rivals bested? There was at Whitehall a steady interest in the late nineteenth century by Salisbury, Balfour, Chamberlain and others in furthering British control in Malaya. But the strategy of expansion, ardently pushed by Straits Settlements officials during the period of ‘High Imperialism’ in the late nineteenth century was checked by other imperatives of British imperialism in Asia. The British were reluctant to take any step in Malaya which, by offending and weakening the Siamese, would encourage French expansion in eastern Siam. Further, the Indian Government, the trustee of British military power in Asia, was unwilling to commit large resources to Southeast Asia which might have been required to combat Russia on India's northwest threshold. These factors limited a British forward movement in Malaya. At times, however, British expansionary fervour did burst stridently upon Malays and Siamese. In 1902 the British wrested concessions from Siam which allowed the placement of British ‘advisers’ in Kelantan and Trengganu, and by which Siam abandoned all prerogatives of interfering with these states' internal affairs. This study is directed to comprehension of the strategy of British expansion in Malaya, particularly of British efforts to sequester control of economic concessions and privileges in Kelantan and Trengganu, and the significance of these manoeuvres in preparing for the transfer of Kelantan, Trengganu, Kedah and Perlis from Siam to Britain in March, 1909.
英国在马来亚的扩张(1897-1902
英国在马来亚的扩张是一个无情的帝国主义的统一表现吗?在这个过程中,英国的经济和政治事业逐渐但无情地获得了间接的霸权,然后是明确的统治;通过友谊和诡计,权力和外交,马来酋长和民众被控制,暹罗权威被否定,欧洲对手被击败?19世纪末,在白厅,索尔兹伯里、鲍尔弗、张伯伦等人对英国在马来亚的进一步控制一直有浓厚的兴趣。但是,在19世纪末的“大帝国主义”时期,海峡殖民地官员热切推动的扩张战略,却被英帝国主义在亚洲的其他迫切需要所遏制。英国不愿在马来亚采取任何行动,因为这会激怒和削弱暹罗人,从而鼓励法国在暹罗东部扩张。此外,作为英国在亚洲军事力量的托管人,印度政府不愿将大量资源投入东南亚,而在印度西北的门槛上与俄罗斯作战可能需要这些资源。这些因素限制了英国在马来亚的前进。然而,有时英国的扩张热情确实在马来人和暹罗人身上猛烈爆发。1902年,英国从暹罗那里取得了让步,允许在吉兰丹和丁加奴安置英国“顾问”,暹罗也因此放弃了干涉这些国家内政的所有特权。本研究旨在理解英国在马来亚的扩张战略,特别是英国在吉兰丹和丁加奴的经济特许权和特权的控制,以及这些策略在准备1909年3月从暹罗向英国移交吉兰丹、丁加奴、吉打和波斯的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信