发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Democracy and Security最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Democracy and State Formation Nexus: Experiences in Somaliland 民主与国家形成关系:索马里兰的经验
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2021-03-23 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2021.1871601
Barkhad M. Kaariye
{"title":"Democracy and State Formation Nexus: Experiences in Somaliland","authors":"Barkhad M. Kaariye","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2021.1871601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2021.1871601","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For democracy to be implemented, there should be a peaceful, functioning, and defined sustem of governance. Though scholars have different perspectives on the nexus between state formation and democracy, this article uses Somaliland as a case. Somaliland, a former British Protectorate and now de facto state in the Horn of Africa, has adopted a hybrid system of governance—traditional, religious, and modern democratic systems of governance. The democratization process in Somaliland started decades back. As per the literature reviewed, most of the researchers have studied the peace-building process and the state formation processes separately. They did not specifically investigate the nexus between democracy and state formation in Somaliland. To fill that gap, this article examines the experiences of Somaliland’s democratization process and its impact on state formation. It clarifies how a clan-based system of governance turned into a democratic multiparty system. The major findings of this article include that democracy has had a huge impact on Somaliland’s state formation process. Not only that, it contributed to the peace-building process as well. Above all, the people of Somaliland were keen on building trust among themselves with democratic principles during the state formation. The application of democracy has permitted Somaliland people the right of accountability where they can change the leaders by casting votes in elections. The characteristics and principles of democracy had emerged in Somaliland’s ruling systems even before it reclaimed its internationally fully recognized independence.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128303542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Terrorism, Regime Type, and Defense Spending: A Cross-National Analysis 恐怖主义、政权类型和国防开支:一个跨国分析
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2021-01-13 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1856083
Lance Y. Hunter
{"title":"Terrorism, Regime Type, and Defense Spending: A Cross-National Analysis","authors":"Lance Y. Hunter","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1856083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1856083","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A small number of studies have investigated how terrorism influences government policies such as military spending through individual case-study analyses. However, scholars have yet to investigate how terrorism influences defense funding across multiple states and regions. This is surprising since prior research has found that terrorism influences political outcomes a number ways by affecting citizens’ emotions such as anxiety and fear. Therefore, this study examines the effect domestic and international terrorism has on military expenditures in 119 states from 1989 to 2012. A cross-sectional time series analysis indicates that terrorism positively affects military spending. However, democratic states are more likely to increase defense funding following terrorist attacks than authoritarian states. Furthermore, international terrorist attacks have the largest effect on defense funding in democracies.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126752604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The Irrational Terrorist & Other Persistent Myths 非理性恐怖分子和其他持久的神话
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2021.1875305
Daniel E. Levenson
{"title":"The Irrational Terrorist & Other Persistent Myths","authors":"Daniel E. Levenson","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2021.1875305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2021.1875305","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125511049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Radical is Birmingham’s Salafi Mosque? 伯明翰的萨拉菲清真寺有多激进?
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1848557
U. Shavit, Fabian Spengler
{"title":"How Radical is Birmingham’s Salafi Mosque?","authors":"U. Shavit, Fabian Spengler","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1848557","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1848557","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Salafi Mosque in Birmingham, England, is a hub of European salafiyya. It is the center of a vibrant network of online and print publications, and hundreds of Muslims attend its prayers. Based on a field study at the mosque that included a written survey with a sample of male attendees and twenty-three interviews with attendees and local leaders, the article challenges the common perception of salafiyya as an approach that inherently involves provocative and costly personal choices and demonstrates the nuanced and ambivalent aspects of its radicalism. It suggests that affiliation with the Salafi Mosque allows a sense of moral superiority while requiring little intellectual effort and few social and financial commitments and that the mosque provides space for the articulation of strong anti-liberal views while avoiding the perils of political activism that directly challenges the mainstream of society. The article also shows how several of the qualities that make the mosque appealing to some Muslims result in its marginalization.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129630124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Borderland Battles: Violence, Crime, and Governance at the Edges of Colombia’s War 边境战争:哥伦比亚战争边缘的暴力、犯罪和治理
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2021.1875304
Jeffrey Coltman-Cormier
{"title":"Borderland Battles: Violence, Crime, and Governance at the Edges of Colombia’s War","authors":"Jeffrey Coltman-Cormier","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2021.1875304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2021.1875304","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115552056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Inferior Domestic Treaty Institutions Lead to Less Democracy and Security: The Case of the United States 低劣的国内条约制度导致更少的民主和安全:以美国为例
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2020-12-26 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1856084
R. Barrett
{"title":"Inferior Domestic Treaty Institutions Lead to Less Democracy and Security: The Case of the United States","authors":"R. Barrett","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1856084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1856084","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT At present, the United States institution handling international agreements is replete with uncertainty about the precise role of different branches of the government and the rules government actors are to follow. The result is inferior democratic rule and a worse bargaining position in world affairs. This article surveys the institution’s current problems with treaties, congressional-executive agreements, and sole executive agreements. It explains the judicial response and why historical practice has not led to a resolution, but an exacerbation of problems. It lays out the costs of these problems and articulates how cementing the Senate’s role in agreements would greatly augment both democarcy and security.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"375 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116325725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
State Sponsorship of Religiously Motivated Terrorism: A Deadly Combination 国家对宗教恐怖主义的支持:一个致命的组合
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2020-11-27 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1848558
Brittnee Carter, Maya Van Nuys, Cagil Albayrak
{"title":"State Sponsorship of Religiously Motivated Terrorism: A Deadly Combination","authors":"Brittnee Carter, Maya Van Nuys, Cagil Albayrak","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1848558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1848558","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the outcomes of suicide terrorism by examining the interaction between religious ideology and state sponsorship. Specifically, we are interested in how state sponsorship may facilitate religiously motivated terrorist groups to carry out suicide attacks. Religiously motivated terrorism groups are predisposed to the utilization of suicide terrorism because of the justification of unrestrained violence to achieve religious goals and the veneration of martyrdom. States will sponsor religiously motivated terrorist groups especially for the purposes of public goods provisions, increasing the state’s bargaining power and credibility, and as a way to export state ideology. The interaction between religion and state sponsorship ultimately facilitates suicide attacks as a low cost, yet highly visible and effective means for both the state and the terrorist group to achieve their goals. The results suggest that not only are religiously motivated terrorist groups more inclined to use suicide terrorism than other group types, but that this inclination is heightened when religiously motivated groups are state-sponsored. Consequently, states should seek to devote specific attention and resources to halting state-sponsors of religiously motivated terrorism and consider including building state capacity as part of a counterterrorism strategy.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125499703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Surveillance, Legal Restraints and Dismantling Democracy: Lessons from Poland 监视、法律限制和民主瓦解:波兰的教训
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2020-11-18 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1841367
Marcin Rojszczak
{"title":"Surveillance, Legal Restraints and Dismantling Democracy: Lessons from Poland","authors":"Marcin Rojszczak","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1841367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1841367","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The principle of proportionality is fundamental to modern democracies. Proportionality and strict necessity are also essential requirements for the legality of public authorities’ surveillance activities. However, nowadays it is becoming more and more difficult to assess the proportionality of a given measure, especially since its surveillance effect may take some time to become apparent. That is why legislatures are increasingly introducing additional legal safeguards to reduce the risk of abuse of power. But can more mechanisms limiting surveillance powers effectively minimize the risk that these powers will be used for non-legal purposes? This key problem will be discussed based on the example of Poland – a EU Member State whose case will be used to illustrate the limited usefulness of the “checks and balances” model in a situation where a resolutely determined authority systematically aims to achieve its goals in violation of the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"14 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114103753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Constructing a “Democratic” Peace: Allied Peacebuilding Strategy in Germany and Japan 构建“民主”和平:德日联合建设和平战略
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2020-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1830763
Michael K. McKoy
{"title":"Constructing a “Democratic” Peace: Allied Peacebuilding Strategy in Germany and Japan","authors":"Michael K. McKoy","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1830763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1830763","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Wheaton College, Department of Politics and International Relations A poor understanding of the causes of the “democratic peace” has contributed to poor policymaking, including attempts to impose democratic governments in order to establish interstate peace. This article explores how Allied policymakers sought to establish peace following World War II while imposing democratic regimes in Germany and Japan. Their strategy for permanently pacifying these countries relied on non-democratic mechanisms: imposing structural weaknesses and forbidding militaristic and hyper-nationalistic organizations and rhetoric. These remained central even following the contingencies of the Cold War. These findings further complicate the relationship between democratization and peacebuilding.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129114187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Cooperative Competencies of Public Officials on the Example of the Border Guards Department in Poland 政府官员的合作能力——以波兰边防部门为例
Democracy and Security Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1818227
Lilla Młodzik
{"title":"Cooperative Competencies of Public Officials on the Example of the Border Guards Department in Poland","authors":"Lilla Młodzik","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1818227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1818227","url":null,"abstract":"The world of science stresses that greater attention should be paid to the development of concepts than high competences of the public sector. Participants of public institutions should be aware of...","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131497005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信