构建“民主”和平:德日联合建设和平战略

Michael K. McKoy
{"title":"构建“民主”和平:德日联合建设和平战略","authors":"Michael K. McKoy","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2020.1830763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Wheaton College, Department of Politics and International Relations A poor understanding of the causes of the “democratic peace” has contributed to poor policymaking, including attempts to impose democratic governments in order to establish interstate peace. This article explores how Allied policymakers sought to establish peace following World War II while imposing democratic regimes in Germany and Japan. Their strategy for permanently pacifying these countries relied on non-democratic mechanisms: imposing structural weaknesses and forbidding militaristic and hyper-nationalistic organizations and rhetoric. These remained central even following the contingencies of the Cold War. These findings further complicate the relationship between democratization and peacebuilding.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing a “Democratic” Peace: Allied Peacebuilding Strategy in Germany and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Michael K. McKoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17419166.2020.1830763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Wheaton College, Department of Politics and International Relations A poor understanding of the causes of the “democratic peace” has contributed to poor policymaking, including attempts to impose democratic governments in order to establish interstate peace. This article explores how Allied policymakers sought to establish peace following World War II while imposing democratic regimes in Germany and Japan. Their strategy for permanently pacifying these countries relied on non-democratic mechanisms: imposing structural weaknesses and forbidding militaristic and hyper-nationalistic organizations and rhetoric. These remained central even following the contingencies of the Cold War. These findings further complicate the relationship between democratization and peacebuilding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Democracy and Security\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Democracy and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1830763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democracy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1830763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

惠顿学院政治与国际关系系对“民主和平”的原因理解不足导致了糟糕的政策制定,包括试图强加民主政府以建立州际和平。本文探讨了二战后盟军决策者如何在德国和日本推行民主制度的同时寻求建立和平。他们永久安抚这些国家的策略依赖于非民主机制:强加结构性弱点,禁止军国主义和超民族主义的组织和言论。即使在冷战的突发事件之后,这些仍然是核心。这些发现使民主化与建设和平之间的关系进一步复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing a “Democratic” Peace: Allied Peacebuilding Strategy in Germany and Japan
ABSTRACT Wheaton College, Department of Politics and International Relations A poor understanding of the causes of the “democratic peace” has contributed to poor policymaking, including attempts to impose democratic governments in order to establish interstate peace. This article explores how Allied policymakers sought to establish peace following World War II while imposing democratic regimes in Germany and Japan. Their strategy for permanently pacifying these countries relied on non-democratic mechanisms: imposing structural weaknesses and forbidding militaristic and hyper-nationalistic organizations and rhetoric. These remained central even following the contingencies of the Cold War. These findings further complicate the relationship between democratization and peacebuilding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信