Administrative Theory and Praxis最新文献_第5页

Otherness: An unfinished project in public administration 另类：公共管理中未完成的项目

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1918989

E. Santis

引用次数: 6

Latinx COVID-19 outcomes: Expanding the role of representative bureaucracy 拉丁美洲COVID-19成果:扩大代议制官僚机构的作用

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-04-24 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1910411

Pamela S. Medina, Lauren Azevedo

引用次数: 6

Standing in the right corner: From practitioner-centric to public-centered public administration 站在右角：从以从业者为中心到以公众为中心的公共行政

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1910413

M. Nisar

{"title":"Standing in the right corner: From practitioner-centric to public-centered public administration","authors":"M. Nisar","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2021.1910413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1910413","url":null,"abstract":"The sociopolitical ecology of public administration (PA) is undergoing major changes. Whether it is the Black Lives Matter movement in the United States, the ongoing farmer protests in India, increased infiltration of algorithm-led policy implementation, or the global ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the fundamental nature of the national and global administrative landscape is changing. These shifts require a fundamental paradigm shift in the way academic research is carried out and disseminated in the public administration community, because business as usual guarantees our continued irrelevance to major governing discourses of our time. Such a fundamental reorientation, however, requires distinguishing between three different types of disciplinary models for the identity of public administration. Distinguishing these different models not only elucidates the nature and degree of change required within the public administration research community but also clarifies the reason that I think Reed’s (2020) recommendations, while thoughtful, are not the solution to resolve the escalating irrelevance of public administration research findings for administrative praxis. To be clear, Reed (2020) offers thoughtful ways in which public administration researchers can better involve practitioners in designing, discussing, and distributing their research results. I do not disagree with any of these suggestions. As I discuss below, however, I am primarily interested in a reorientation of the discipline away from the practitioners as the primary audience of PA research and not the modalities of engagement with them.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"44 1","pages":"87 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2021.1910413","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42956807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Don’t exclude real practitioners with the imaginary ones: A comment on Azfar Nisar’s “Practitioner as the imaginary father of public administration” 不要用想象的实践者来排斥真实的实践者——评阿兹法尔·尼萨尔的“实践者是公共行政的想象之父”

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-04-09 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1910412

David S. Reed

引用次数: 2

Governing smart mobility: policy instrumentation, technological utopianism, and the administrative quest for knowledge 管理智能移动:政策工具、技术乌托邦主义和对知识的行政追求

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2020.1782111

Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren, Alexander Paulsson

{"title":"Governing smart mobility: policy instrumentation, technological utopianism, and the administrative quest for knowledge","authors":"Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren, Alexander Paulsson","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2020.1782111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1782111","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyzes administrative practices in relation to the emergence of novel technologies. “Smart mobility” is an umbrella term used to denote the potentially disruptive changes in the transport sector relating to automatization, digitalization, and the platform economy. While this development is largely driven by industry, public administrations are engaging in a number of processes where they seek to obtain knowledge while regulating the development of, for example, autonomous vehicles. The aim of this article was to study how administrative practices of governing create, delimit and constitute smart mobility as a governable object. This is done by analyzing the policy instruments deployed by public administrations to obtain and disseminate knowledge in innovation processes, with the aim of controlling its development. The analysis shows that public administrators utilize four main categories of policy instruments: pilots, standards, scenarios, and collaboration. By developing scenarios, following pilots and collaborating with a variety of stakeholders, the administrations are not only tapping into newly produced knowledge and learning about the potential impact of these technological novelties, these processes are also creating and delimiting smart mobility as an object to be governed.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"43 1","pages":"135 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2020.1782111","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59726318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Hiding in plain sight: recovering public administration’s lost legacy of social justice 隐藏在众目睽睽之下:恢复公共行政失去的社会正义遗产

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1891796

DeLysa Burnier

引用次数: 4

Some reflections on contestation and cosmopolitanism in democracy and their implications for public administration 关于民主中的竞争性和世界主义及其对公共管理的启示

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-03-09 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1891795

M. Spicer

引用次数: 1

Simulacra and spectacle: The role of negative public values in the re-enchantment of U.S. politics 拟像与奇观:消极的公共价值观在美国政治的重新魅力中的作用

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1891797

Aaron Smith-Walter, Christian Angelucci

引用次数: 0

Time to collaborate: How time influences value creation for a nonprofit collective 合作时间：时间如何影响非营利集体的价值创造

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1891798

Sara E. McClellan

引用次数: 0

Centering the margins: Restorative and transformative justice as our path to social equity 以边缘为中心：恢复性和变革性正义是我们实现社会公平的途径

Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2021-02-02 DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2020.1868159

Adana Protonentis, R. Chordiya, ChrisTiana ObeySumner

{"title":"Centering the margins: Restorative and transformative justice as our path to social equity","authors":"Adana Protonentis, R. Chordiya, ChrisTiana ObeySumner","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2020.1868159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1868159","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic magnified the cracks and chasms in our social structures. It threw a hard truth into sharp relief: in an emergency response, it is the marginalized members of our community who are most at risk of being left behind. This article aims to contribute to the COVID-19 dialogue series by highlighting the social justice and social equity concerns related to disability justice in an emergency response. Specifically, we examine the case of K-12 school closures in Washington State in response to the COVID-19 public health crisis, for its impact on students with disabilities. We find that the response to COVID-19 emergency guided by utilitarian approaches, led to further marginalization and inequitable impact on special education students and their families. We propose that an alternative approach of Targeted Universalism that involves universal goal-setting and targeted strategy development, when modified to include Restorative and Transformative justice practices, may be a valuable tool to create the conditions for an emergency response that promotes social equity and social justice.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"43 1","pages":"333 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2020.1868159","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47140146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8