Campbell Systematic Reviews最新文献

{"title":"Psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID related distancing behaviours: A systematic review","authors":"Jennifer Hanratty, Rachel Leonard, Sean R. O'Connor, Ciara Keenan, Yuan Chi, Janet Ferguson, Ariana Axiaq, Anna Volz, Ceri Welsh, Kerry Campbell, Victoria Hawkins, Sarah Miller, Declan Bradley, Martin Dempster","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1442","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has resulted in illness, deaths and societal disruption on a global scale. Societies have implemented various control measures to reduce transmission of the virus and mitigate its impact. Individual behavioural changes are crucial to the successful implementation of these measures. One commonly recommended measure to limit risk of infection is distancing. It is important to identify those factors that can predict the uptake and maintenance of distancing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We aimed to identify and synthesise the evidence on malleable psychological and psychosocial factors that determine uptake and adherence to distancing aimed at reducing the risk of infection or transmission of COVID-19.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched various literature sources including electronic databases (Medline ALL, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, ERIC, PsycInfo, CINAHL & Web of Science), web searches, conference proceedings, government reports, other repositories of literature and grey literature. The search strategy was built around three concepts of interest including (1) context (terms relating to COVID-19), (2) behaviour of interest and (3) terms related to psychological and psychosocial determinants of COVID-19 Health-Related Behaviours and adherence or compliance with distancing, to capture malleable determines. Searches capture studies up until October 2021.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Eligibility criteria included observational studies (both retrospective and prospective) and experimental studies that measure and report malleable psychological and psychosocial determinants and distancing (social and/or physical) at an individual level, amongst the general public. We defined physical distancing as, maintaining the recommended distance from others when physically present. And social distancing being defined as, minimising social contact with those outside of your own household. Screening was supported by the Cochrane Crowd. Studies' titles and abstracts were screened against the eligibility criteria by three independent screeners. Following this, all potentially relevant studies were screened at full-text level by the research team. All conflicts between screeners were resolved by discussion between the core research team.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1442","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142435116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Campbell Standards: Modernizing Campbell's Methodologic Expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR)","authors":"Ariel M. Aloe,&nbsp;Omar Dewidar,&nbsp;Emily A. Hennessy,&nbsp;Terri Pigott,&nbsp;Gavin Stewart,&nbsp;Vivian Welch,&nbsp;David B. Wilson,&nbsp;Campbell MECCIR Working Group","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1445","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.1445","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The authors formed a small working group to modernize the Methodological Expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR). We reviewed comments and feedback from editors, peer reviewers of Campbell submissions, and authors; for example, that the Campbell MECCIR was long and some of the items in the reporting and conduct checklists were difficult to cross-reference. We also wanted to make the checklist more relevant for reviews of associations or risk factors and other quantitative non-intervention review types, which we welcome in Campbell. Thus, our aim was to develop a shorter, more holistic guidance and checklist of Campbell Standards, encompassing both conduct and reporting of these standards within the same checklist.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our updated Campbell Standards will be a living document. To develop this first iteration, we invited Campbell members to join a virtual working group; we sought experience in conducting Campbell systematic reviews and in conducting methods editor reviews for Campbell. We aligned the items from the MECCIR for conduct and reporting, then compared the principles of conduct that apply across review types to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-literature search extension (S) and PRISMA-2020 reporting standards. We discussed each section with the aim of developing a parsimonious checklist with explanatory guidance while avoiding losing important concepts that are relevant to all types of reviews. We held nine meetings to discuss each section in detail between September 2022 and March 2023. We circulated this initial checklist and guidance to all Campbell editors, methods editors, information specialists and co-chairs to seek their feedback. All feedback was discussed by the working group and incorporated to the Standards or, if not incorporated, a formal response was returned about the rationale for why the feedback was not incorporated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Campbell Policy</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The guidance includes seven main sections with 35 items multifaceted but distinct concepts that authors must adhere to when conducting Campbell reviews. Authors and reviewers must be mindful that multiple factors need to be assessed for each item. According to the Campbell Standards, the reporting of Campbell reviews must adhere to appropriate PRISMA reporting guidelines(s) such as PRISMA-2020.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> How to Use</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The editorial board recommends authors use the checklist dur","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456310/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The relationship between homework time and academic performance among K-12: A systematic review","authors":"Liping Guo,&nbsp;Jieyun Li,&nbsp;Zheng Xu,&nbsp;Xiaoling Hu,&nbsp;Chunyan Liu,&nbsp;Xin Xing,&nbsp;Xiuxia Li,&nbsp;Howard White,&nbsp;Kehu Yang","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1431","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Homework is a common educational task given to students around the world. It demands mental exertion, but staying focused can be challenging, especially for K-12 students. Too much homework can increase their cognitive load and mental fatigue, leading to decreased motivation and performance. This can cause boredom with homework and learning. To lessen their load and make homework more effective, it is important to establish the connection between homework duration and academic achievement.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To evaluate the relationship between homework time and academic performance among K-12 students.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Search Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;On November 5, 2021, we retrieved articles from a variety sources. Firstly, we searched 10 electronic databases for related publications, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Business Source Premier, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Journal Storage (JSTOR), Learning and Technology Library (LearnTechLib), OCLC FirstSearch, Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science), and Teacher Reference Center. We also searched two publisher platforms: ScienceDirect and Taylor &amp; Francis Online Database. Secondly, we consulted five educational organization website such as, American Educational Research Association, Best Evidence Encyclopedia, Education Endowment Foundation, European Educational Research Association, What Works Clearinghouse, and the Open Grey database for unpublished studies. We then searched Open Dissertations and ProQuest Dissertations &amp; Theses Global databases to locate the relevant dissertations and theses. Additionally, we hand-searched seven educational journals to identify unpublished documents, reports, and potential studies not indexed in the databases. Lastly, we searched Campbell Library to identify relevant reviews and primary (and nearly eligible studies) in these reviews. We also searched Google Scholar for related studies and checked the citations of eligible studies as well as their bibliographies.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Selection Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;Studies with the following criteria were included:\u0000\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;− &lt;/span&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Population:&lt;/i&gt; K-12 school students with no disabilities or not attending special education schools;&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;− &lt;/span&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1431","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142245033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Campbell title registrations to date – August 2024, and discontinued protocols","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1439","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please &lt;i&gt;send an email&lt;/i&gt; to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email &lt;span&gt;[email protected]&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Intergenerational programs to improve the psychosocial health and wellbeing of older adults in residential aged care: What works, for whom, in what circumstances and how? A rapid realist review&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lysha Lee, Pat Nicholson, Kayla Lock, Katrin Gerber, Alison Hutchinson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23 July 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Availability and effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of obesity in children and adolescents from low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gerardo Gomez, Muhammad Asim, Aliya Ayub, Zulfiqar Bhutta, Saima Afaq&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 August 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Effectiveness of school-based nutrition education interventions on obesity and nutritional status of adolescent girls: A systematic review&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sehar Iqbal, Taima Qudah, Abdul Momin Rizwan Ahmad&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 August 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Influencing factors and strategies to improve emotional regulation among adolescents: A mixed-method systematic review&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Preejana Sharma, Shweta Rai, Linu George&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24 June 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interventions and outcomes for depressive symptoms among children and adolescents: An evidence and gap map.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pengpeng Cao, Yuhao Li, Luyao Yang, Shuo Zhang, Jieyixi Hua, Bingxia Dang, Chuying Li, Bei An, Zheng Xu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24 June 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What does the available research tell us about health visitor activities in the United Kingdom and the outcomes for babies and children under five years of age, and their parents or primary caregivers: An evidence and gap map&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michael Fanner, Jane Barlow, Sarah Cowley, Karen Whittaker, Helen Critcher, Mary Malone&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24 June 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Effects of positive psychological interventions on young children's mental health and well-being: A systematic review&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Daniel Hernández-Torrano, Dianne Vella-Brodrick, Laura Ibrayeva, Manat Sergazina, Kelsey Lewis, Anara Burambayeva, Aiida Kulsary&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19 June 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bereavement interventions for children and adolescents: An evidence and gap map of primary studies and systematic reviews&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Leonor Rodriguez, James Lyons, Amy Maloy, Ailsa O'Brien&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10 June 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Suicidal behaviours post-natural disasters: An evidence gap map&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mike Trott, Urska Arnautovska, Dan Siskind&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 June 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Situational crime prevention measures to prevent terrorist attacks against soft targets and crowded places: An evidence and gap map&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Caitlin Clemmow, Zoe Marchment, Pa","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1439","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews","authors":"Heather MacDonald,&nbsp;Cozette Comer,&nbsp;Margaret Foster,&nbsp;Patrick R. Labelle,&nbsp;Scott Marsalis,&nbsp;Kate Nyhan,&nbsp;Zahra Premji,&nbsp;Morwenna Rogers,&nbsp;Ryan Splenda,&nbsp;Claire Stansfield,&nbsp;Sarah Young","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1433","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This guide outlines general issues in searching for studies; describes the main sources of potential studies; and discusses how to plan the search process, design, and carry out search strategies, manage references found during the search process and document and report the search process.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1433","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Protocol: Factors contributing to the discontinuation of breastfeeding upon women's return to work: A systematic review protocol","authors":"Ana Veronica Scotta,&nbsp;Paula Eugenia Barral,&nbsp;Ailin Farre,&nbsp;Elio Andrés Soria","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1434","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 <p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. In order to understand the variables affecting breastfeeding in working women, this systematic review will aim to determine the factors associated with early breastfeeding cessation upon women's return to work within a Social-Ecological framework. This will be achieved by answering the following questions: Which individual factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which interpersonal factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which community factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which institutional factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which public policies are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1434","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1438","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.1438","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smith, A., Roberts, A., Krzemieniewska-Nandwani, K., Eggins, E., Cook, W., Fox, C., Maruna, S., Wallace, S., &amp; Szifris, K. (2024). Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review. <i>Campbell Systematic Reviews</i>, <i>20</i>, e1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.142</p><p>There is an omission of the word “PROTOCOL” at the beginning of the article title and the correct article title should read as:</p><p>PROTOCOL: Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review.</p><p>The correct article category is PROTOCOL.</p><p>The article title and the category have been corrected in the original publication. We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366963/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1437","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.1437","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Littell, J. H., Young, S., Pigott, T. D., Biggs, M. A., Munk-Olsen, T., &amp; Steinberg, J. R. (2024). Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>Campbell Systematic Reviews</i>, <i>20</i>, e1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1410</p><p>There was an omission of “Protocol” at the beginning of the title for this protocol. The correct title is as follows:</p><p>PROTOCOL: Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review","authors":"Fadzilah Hanum Mohd Mydin,&nbsp;Christopher Mikton,&nbsp;Wan Yuen Choo,&nbsp;Ranita Hisham Shunmugam,&nbsp;Aja Murray,&nbsp;Yongjie Yon,&nbsp;Raudah M. Yunus,&nbsp;Noran N. Hairi,&nbsp;Farizah M. Hairi,&nbsp;Marie Beaulieu,&nbsp;Amanda Phelan","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1419","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The examination of psychometric properties in instruments measuring abuse of older people (AOP) is a crucial area of study that has, unfortunately, received relatively little attention. Poor psychometric properties in AOP measurement instruments can significantly contribute to inconsistencies in prevalence estimates, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the magnitude of the problem at national, regional, and global levels.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This review rigorously employed the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline on the quality of outcome measures. It was designed to identify and review the instruments used to measure AOP, assess the instruments' measurement properties, and identify the definitions of AOP and abuse subtypes measured by these instruments, ensuring the reliability and validity of the findings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Search Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A comprehensive search was conducted up to May 2023 across various online databases, including AgeLine via EBSCOhost, ASSIA via ProQuest, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, EMBASE, LILACS, ProQuest Dissertation &amp; Theses Global, PsycINFO via EBSCOhost, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Sociological Abstract via ProQuest, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Google Scholar and WHO Global Index Medicus. Additionally, relevant studies were identified by thoroughly searching the grey literature from resources such as Campbell Collaboration, OpenAIRE, and GRAFT.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Selection Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;All quantitative, qualitative (addressing face and content validity), and mixed-method empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journals or grey literature were included in this review. The included studies were primary studies that (1) evaluated one or more psychometric properties, (2) contained information on instrument development, or (3) examined the content validity of the instruments designed to measure AOP in community or institutional settings. The selected studies describe at least one psychometric property: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Study participants represent the population of interest, including males and females aged 60 or older in community or institutional settings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Collection and Analysis&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Two reviewers evaluated the screening of the selected studies' titles, abstracts, and full texts","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1419","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142100329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Interventions promoting resilience through climate smart agricultural practices for women farmers: A systematic review","authors":"Ashrita Saran,&nbsp;Sabina Singh,&nbsp;Neha Gupta,&nbsp;Sujata Chodankar Walke,&nbsp;Ranjana Rao,&nbsp;Christine Simiyu,&nbsp;Suchi Malhotra,&nbsp;Avni Mishra,&nbsp;Ranjitha Puskur,&nbsp;Edoardo Masset,&nbsp;Howard White,&nbsp;Hugh Sharma Waddington","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1426","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural production worldwide, with developing countries being particularly vulnerable to its negative impacts. Agriculture, which is a crucial factor in ensuring food security and livelihoods, is particularly vulnerable to changes in climate patterns, such as increased temperatures, drought, and extreme weather events. One approach to addressing these challenges is by promoting the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices among farmers. CSA combines traditional agricultural practices with innovative techniques and technologies to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change. infrastructure. By adopting CSA practices, farmers can enhance their resilience to climate variability and improve their productivity.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This review examines the effectiveness of interventions promoting CSA to enhance farmers' knowledge of the benefits of CSA approaches, subsequent adoption of CSA, and disadoption of harmful agricultural practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Search Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We searched 39 academic and online databases, websites, and repositories and screened over 19,000 experimental and quasi-experimental publications to identify studies promoting CSA practices to women farmers. We conducted a citation tracking process on included studies and contacted experts to ensure a thorough search.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Selection Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The review focused on studies that included interventions promoting climate-smart agricultural approaches. Using EPPI Reviewer 4, two review authors independently screened the impact evaluation using a standardized screening tool.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Collection and Analysis&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Information about participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, control conditions, research design, sample size, bias risk, outcomes, and results were gathered. Data collection and quantitative analysis were conducted using standard Campbell Collaboration methods.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Main Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Eight impact evaluations were found (two randomized controlled trials) evaluating the effects of CSA practices on farmer's knowledge gains of the benefits of CSA practices and subsequent adoption. ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1426","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142077829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}