Interventions promoting resilience through climate smart agricultural practices for women farmers: A systematic review

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ashrita Saran, Sabina Singh, Neha Gupta, Sujata Chodankar Walke, Ranjana Rao, Christine Simiyu, Suchi Malhotra, Avni Mishra, Ranjitha Puskur, Edoardo Masset, Howard White, Hugh Sharma Waddington
{"title":"Interventions promoting resilience through climate smart agricultural practices for women farmers: A systematic review","authors":"Ashrita Saran,&nbsp;Sabina Singh,&nbsp;Neha Gupta,&nbsp;Sujata Chodankar Walke,&nbsp;Ranjana Rao,&nbsp;Christine Simiyu,&nbsp;Suchi Malhotra,&nbsp;Avni Mishra,&nbsp;Ranjitha Puskur,&nbsp;Edoardo Masset,&nbsp;Howard White,&nbsp;Hugh Sharma Waddington","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural production worldwide, with developing countries being particularly vulnerable to its negative impacts. Agriculture, which is a crucial factor in ensuring food security and livelihoods, is particularly vulnerable to changes in climate patterns, such as increased temperatures, drought, and extreme weather events. One approach to addressing these challenges is by promoting the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices among farmers. CSA combines traditional agricultural practices with innovative techniques and technologies to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change. infrastructure. By adopting CSA practices, farmers can enhance their resilience to climate variability and improve their productivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This review examines the effectiveness of interventions promoting CSA to enhance farmers' knowledge of the benefits of CSA approaches, subsequent adoption of CSA, and disadoption of harmful agricultural practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched 39 academic and online databases, websites, and repositories and screened over 19,000 experimental and quasi-experimental publications to identify studies promoting CSA practices to women farmers. We conducted a citation tracking process on included studies and contacted experts to ensure a thorough search.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\n \n <p>The review focused on studies that included interventions promoting climate-smart agricultural approaches. Using EPPI Reviewer 4, two review authors independently screened the impact evaluation using a standardized screening tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\n \n <p>Information about participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, control conditions, research design, sample size, bias risk, outcomes, and results were gathered. Data collection and quantitative analysis were conducted using standard Campbell Collaboration methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight impact evaluations were found (two randomized controlled trials) evaluating the effects of CSA practices on farmer's knowledge gains of the benefits of CSA practices and subsequent adoption. Knowledge dissemination approaches such as Farmer Field Schools and weather and climate information services were found to positively impact farmers' knowledge and adoption of specific CSA practices. However, the evidence supporting this claim is uncertain as a high risk of bias was assessed for five of the eight included studies. However, we found no effects on the disadoption of harmful practices such as pesticide overuse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Authors' Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The evidence base for studies promoting climate-smart agricultural approaches (CSA) to farmers in LMICs is small, and there is a lack of studies reporting sex-disaggregated data and studies explicitly targeting women farmers. The review suggests that knowledge dissemination techniques are significantly effective in improving CSA knowledge and adoption, including integrated pest management techniques and their benefits, adoption of climate-resilient rice seed varieties (STRVs), and use of botanical pesticides by farmers. More and better confidence studies are needed to inform policy and programming, including those that look at a wider range of interventions, including changing norms, values, and institutional arrangements.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1426","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural production worldwide, with developing countries being particularly vulnerable to its negative impacts. Agriculture, which is a crucial factor in ensuring food security and livelihoods, is particularly vulnerable to changes in climate patterns, such as increased temperatures, drought, and extreme weather events. One approach to addressing these challenges is by promoting the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices among farmers. CSA combines traditional agricultural practices with innovative techniques and technologies to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change. infrastructure. By adopting CSA practices, farmers can enhance their resilience to climate variability and improve their productivity.

Objectives

This review examines the effectiveness of interventions promoting CSA to enhance farmers' knowledge of the benefits of CSA approaches, subsequent adoption of CSA, and disadoption of harmful agricultural practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Search Methods

We searched 39 academic and online databases, websites, and repositories and screened over 19,000 experimental and quasi-experimental publications to identify studies promoting CSA practices to women farmers. We conducted a citation tracking process on included studies and contacted experts to ensure a thorough search.

Selection Criteria

The review focused on studies that included interventions promoting climate-smart agricultural approaches. Using EPPI Reviewer 4, two review authors independently screened the impact evaluation using a standardized screening tool.

Data Collection and Analysis

Information about participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, control conditions, research design, sample size, bias risk, outcomes, and results were gathered. Data collection and quantitative analysis were conducted using standard Campbell Collaboration methods.

Main Results

Eight impact evaluations were found (two randomized controlled trials) evaluating the effects of CSA practices on farmer's knowledge gains of the benefits of CSA practices and subsequent adoption. Knowledge dissemination approaches such as Farmer Field Schools and weather and climate information services were found to positively impact farmers' knowledge and adoption of specific CSA practices. However, the evidence supporting this claim is uncertain as a high risk of bias was assessed for five of the eight included studies. However, we found no effects on the disadoption of harmful practices such as pesticide overuse.

Authors' Conclusions

The evidence base for studies promoting climate-smart agricultural approaches (CSA) to farmers in LMICs is small, and there is a lack of studies reporting sex-disaggregated data and studies explicitly targeting women farmers. The review suggests that knowledge dissemination techniques are significantly effective in improving CSA knowledge and adoption, including integrated pest management techniques and their benefits, adoption of climate-resilient rice seed varieties (STRVs), and use of botanical pesticides by farmers. More and better confidence studies are needed to inform policy and programming, including those that look at a wider range of interventions, including changing norms, values, and institutional arrangements.

Abstract Image

通过气候智能型农业实践提高女性农民抗灾能力的干预措施:系统回顾
背景 气候变化对全世界的农业生产构成重大威胁,发展中国家尤其容易受到气候变化的负面影响。农业是确保粮食安全和生计的关键因素,尤其容易受到气候模式变化的影响,如气温升高、干旱和极端天气事件。应对这些挑战的方法之一是促进农民采用气候智能型农业(CSA)做法。CSA 将传统农业实践与创新技术和工艺相结合,以适应和减轻气候变化的影响。通过采用 CSA 实践,农民可以增强对气候多变性的适应能力,提高生产率。 目标 本综述研究了在中低收入国家(LMICs)推广 CSA 以提高农民对 CSA 方法益处的认识、随后采用 CSA 以及放弃有害农业做法的干预措施的有效性。 检索方法 我们检索了 39 个学术和在线数据库、网站和资料库,筛选了 19,000 多篇实验和准实验出版物,以确定向女性农民推广 CSA 实践的研究。我们对收录的研究进行了引文追踪,并联系了专家,以确保搜索的全面性。 筛选标准 本次综述的重点是包含推广气候智能型农业方法的干预措施的研究。通过 EPPI Reviewer 4,两位综述作者使用标准化筛选工具对影响评估进行了独立筛选。 数据收集与分析 收集了有关参与者特征、干预措施特征、对照条件、研究设计、样本大小、偏差风险、结果和成果的信息。数据收集和定量分析采用标准的坎贝尔合作方法进行。 主要结果 发现了八项影响评估(两项随机对照试验),评估了 CSA 实践对农民了解 CSA 实践的益处以及随后采用 CSA 实践的影响。研究发现,农民田间学校、天气和气候信息服务等知识传播方式对农民了解和采用特定的 CSA 实践产生了积极影响。然而,支持这一说法的证据并不确定,因为在纳入的八项研究中,有五项被评估为偏倚风险较高。不过,我们没有发现信息对放弃过度使用杀虫剂等有害做法有任何影响。 作者的结论 向低收入和中等收入国家的农民推广气候智能型农业方法(CSA)的研究证据基础较小,缺乏报告按性别分列的数据的研究和明确针对女性农民的研究。综述表明,知识传播技术在提高 CSA 知识和采用率方面非常有效,包括病虫害综合防治技术及其益处、采用气候适应性强的水稻种子品种(STRVs)以及农民使用植物杀虫剂。需要开展更多更好的置信度研究,为政策和规划提供信息,包括研究更广泛的干预措施,包括改变规范、价值观和制度安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信