JBJS Open Access最新文献

{"title":"ChatGPT-4 Knows Its A B C D E but Cannot Cite Its Source.","authors":"Diane Ghanem, Alexander R Zhu, Whitney Kagabo, Greg Osgood, Babar Shafiq","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00099","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The artificial intelligence language model Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) has shown potential as a reliable and accessible educational resource in orthopaedic surgery. Yet, the accuracy of the references behind the provided information remains elusive, which poses a concern for maintaining the integrity of medical content. This study aims to examine the accuracy of the references provided by ChatGPT-4 concerning the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach in trauma surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers critically assessed 30 ChatGPT-4-generated references supporting the well-established ABCDE approach to trauma protocol, grading them as 0 (nonexistent), 1 (inaccurate), or 2 (accurate). All discrepancies between the ChatGPT-4 and PubMed references were carefully reviewed and bolded. Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to examine the agreement of the accuracy scores of the ChatGPT-4-generated references between reviewers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the mean reference accuracy scores. To compare the variance of the means across the 5 categories, one-way analysis of variance was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4 had an average reference accuracy score of 66.7%. Of the 30 references, only 43.3% were accurate and deemed \"true\" while 56.7% were categorized as \"false\" (43.3% inaccurate and 13.3% nonexistent). The accuracy was consistent across the 5 trauma protocol categories, with no significant statistical difference (p = 0.437).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With 57% of references being inaccurate or nonexistent, ChatGPT-4 has fallen short in providing reliable and reproducible references-a concerning finding for the safety of using ChatGPT-4 for professional medical decision making without thorough verification. Only if used cautiously, with cross-referencing, can this language model act as an adjunct learning tool that can enhance comprehensiveness as well as knowledge rehearsal and manipulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368215/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Predicting the Occurrence of New Vertebral Fractures Using the Vertebral Bone Quality Score: A Prospective Cohort Study Using 11-Year MRI Follow-up Data from the Minami-Aizu Study.","authors":"Takeru Yokota, Koji Otani, Yuji Endo, Ryoji Tominaga, Takuya Kameda, Kenji Kobayashi, Takehiro Watanabe, Miho Sekiguchi, Shin-Ichi Konno, Yoshihiro Matsumoto","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00161","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00161","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have recognized the potential of the Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) score for predicting fractures. However, these studies often have lacked longitudinal perspectives and have not focused on community populations. Our study aimed to enhance the predictive capacity of the VBQ score by investigating its correlation with new vertebral fractures (NVFs) that were detected 11 years later in a community-based cohort and by developing a comprehensive prediction model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a population-based study conducted in the Minami-Aizu area in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. One hundred and thirty participants voluntarily underwent T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine in 2004 and 2015. VBQ scores were ascertained from the 2004 scans. NVFs that occurred between 2004 and 2015 were detected based on a ≥20% reduction in vertebral height on the midsagittal sections of the MRI. Other predictors that were considered included age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, and existing vertebral fractures (EVFs). A logistic regression analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logistic regression analysis indicated that the VBQ score, age, sex, and EVFs were significant predictors of NVFs. The prediction model showed an area under the curve of 0.84, suggesting excellent discriminatory power. The calibration capacity was confirmed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VBQ score was significantly correlated with the long-term incidence of NVFs in a community population. The prediction model exhibited satisfactory discrimination and calibration capacities, highlighting the use of the VBQ score as a potential tool for long-term prediction of NVFs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335329/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142056783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Comparison of PROMIS Scores of Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis and Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant Hemiarthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus.","authors":"Seif El Masry, Allison L Boden, Grace M DiGiovanni, Agnes D Cororaton, Scott J Ellis","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00158","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current literature shows similar clinical outcomes between first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of hallux rigidus; however, prior studies have not reported validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare PROMs using 6 domains of the validated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in patients treated for hallux rigidus with MTP joint arthrodesis and with SCI hemiarthroplasty. In addition, this novel study provides comparative data on the complication and revision rates for each procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective registry search identified all patients with preoperative PROMIS scores who underwent MTP joint arthrodesis or SCI hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus between February 2016 and June 2021. The study aimed to determine if the 2 procedures showed statistically or clinically equivalent PROMIS scores in 6 domains: physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, global physical health, global mental health, and depression. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to compare adjusted 1-year postoperative PROMIS scores between the 2 cohorts. Complication and revision rates were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 82 patients who underwent SCI hemiarthroplasty and 101 who underwent MTP joint arthrodesis. Demographic data and preoperative hallux rigidus severity showed no significant differences between the cohorts. PROMIS scores were mostly comparable between the 2 groups, except for the pain intensity domain. The patients who underwent MTP joint arthrodesis exhibited significantly better pain relief at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, which was supported by adjusted postoperative PROMIS scores. At 2 years, the SCI group had worse pain intensity scores and lower global physical health scores. There were no differences between the cohorts in additional PROMIS scores or complication data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While outcomes in most of the domains were similar, MTP joint arthrodesis was more effective at mitigating pain intensity compared with SCI hemiarthroplasty. This information can guide patient counseling and decision-making when considering surgical intervention for hallux rigidus.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiographic Assessment of Pelvic Inlet and Outlet View Angles in the Ethiopian Population.","authors":"Solomon Melkamu, Gabriel Alemayehu, Samuel Hailu","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00015","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate radiographic assessment is pivotal in evaluating trauma patients with suspected pelvic ring disruptions. The conventional approach of using anteroposterior, 45° inlet, and 45° outlet radiographs for the evaluation of pelvic injury may not consistently align with varying lumbopelvic anatomy. This study aimed to determine the ideal pelvic inlet and outlet radiographic angles when there is limited access to advanced imaging (e.g., computed tomography [CT]) for assessing clinically relevant pelvic osseous landmarks and to investigate variations based on age, sex, and sacral dysmorphism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study investigated patients who were ≥18 years of age who had no traumatic injuries or pelvic ring pathology; we reviewed abdominopelvic CT scans that were obtained between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2023. Midsagittal reconstruction and 3D rendering of 148 CT scans facilitated the measurement of pelvic inlet and outlet angles. Standard techniques that were based on previous studies were used to determine the ideal angles. Statistical analyses investigated mean pelvic inlet and outlet angles as well as correlations with age, sex, and sacral dysmorphism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pelvic inlet angle was 23.8° ± 8.4° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.4° to 25.2°), and the mean outlet angle was 40.1° ± 5.9° (95% CI: 39.2° to 41.1°). Male patients exhibited greater inlet angles (27° versus 20°), whereas female patients had greater outlet angles (41° versus 39°). Pelves with dysmorphism showed a 3.6° increase in outlet angles when compared with those with normal sacral anatomy. An inverse relationship between age and inlet angle was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that the recommended 45° angle for pelvic inlet and outlet views may not optimally align with the anatomy of the Ethiopian population. The findings suggest that the ideal inlet and outlet angles for this population are 25° and 40°, respectively. Understanding these variations is crucial for optimizing pelvic radiographic views in trauma evaluation, potentially leading to more accurate assessments and improved patient care in this demographic.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intra-Articular Corrective Osteotomy for Distal Radial Intra-Articular Malunion Using Patient-Matched Instruments: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial.","authors":"Kunihiro Oka, Satoshi Miyamura, Ryoya Shiode, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Norimasa Iwasaki, Daisuke Kawamura, Kazuki Sato, Takuji Iwamoto, Michiro Yamamoto, Keiichiro Nishida, Yasunori Shimamura, Tomomi Yamada, Seiji Okada, Tsuyoshi Murase","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00026","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion is a challenging procedure. However, recent advancements, including patient-matched instruments created on the basis of preoperative computer simulation, enable accurate intra-articular correction. We hypothesized that intra-articular corrective osteotomy using patient-matched instruments for the treatment of distal radial intra-articular malunion would reduce intra-articular deformity and restore wrist function at 12 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 12 patients with distal radial intra-articular malunion who underwent intra-articular corrective osteotomy external to the joint using patient-matched instruments. The primary end point was the maximum step-off on the articular surface of the distal radius, measured with use of computed tomography (CT), with an expected postoperative value of ≤1.5 mm. The secondary end points included the gap of the articular surface; range of motion; grip strength; pain evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS); patient satisfaction; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. A mean postoperative step-off of ≤1.5 mm for the primary end point was assessed with use of the 1-sample t test. The secondary end points were assessed with use of the Dunnett multiple comparison test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average step-off significantly improved from 3.75 ± 1.04 mm preoperatively to 0.51 ± 0.40 mm at the 52-week postoperative follow-up and was maintained within 1.5 mm. The average wrist and forearm range of motion, VAS score, grip strength, DASH score, and PRWE score significantly improved. Eleven patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of patient-matched instruments could contribute to improving postoperative outcomes of intra-articular corrective osteotomy procedures involving the distal radius.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328987/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Predictors Associated with the Need for Open Reduction of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Meta-analysis of the Recent Literature.","authors":"M Bryant Transtrum, Diego Sanchez, Shauna Griffith, Brianna Godinez, Vishwajeet Singh, Kyle J Klahs, Amr Abdelgawad, Ahmed M Thabet","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00011","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are some of the most common fractures in pediatric patients with surgery typically consisting of either open or closed reduction with internal fixation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify patient, injury, and administrative factors that are associated with treating pediatric SCH fractures with open techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed and CINAHL database searches were conducted for studies from 2010 to 2023 that made direct comparisons between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) for treating SCH fractures in the pediatric population. The search terms used were \"pediatric\" AND \"SCH fracture\" OR \"distal humerus fracture.\" Screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by 4 reviewers. After testing for heterogeneity between studies, data were aggregated using random-effects model analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis. Summated, there were 94,415 patients: 11,329 treated with ORIF and 83,086 treated with CRPP. Factors that were significantly associated with greater rates of ORIF included obesity (p = 0.001), Gartland type IV fractures (p < 0.001), general neurological deficits (p = 0.019), and ulnar nerve deficits (p = 0.003). Gartland type II (p = 0.033) and medially displaced fractures (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with lower rates of ORIF. Secondary analysis showed cross-pinning constructs (p = 0.033) and longer hospital stays (p = 0.005) are more likely to be observed in patients undergoing ORIF compared with CRPP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that factors such as obesity, fracture displacement, and concomitant nerve deficits are more likely to require ORIF as opposed to CRPP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299990/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Revisiting Differences in Fourth-Year Orthopaedic Away Rotation Opportunities and Fees Among Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Students.","authors":"Anthony Modica, Adam Kazimierczak, Brandon J Klein, Peter B White, Adam D Bitterman, Randy M Cohn","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00041","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fourth-year away rotations are an important modifiable variable proven to increase students' opportunities to match into orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in away rotation eligibility requirements and cost of rotation between allopathic and osteopathic students during the 2023 application cycle. Eligibility requirements and fees were then compared with the 2021 application cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed during the 2023 application cycle of all nonmilitary, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs (n = 194). Each program's website, affiliated school of medicine's website, visiting student application service portal, and Residency Explorer tool were searched for eligibility criteria, associated rotation fees, and other rotation requirements. Two-sample Z tests for proportions were utilized to compare differences in programs with differing requirements for students based on academic degree type. Data were compared statistically with previously reported data from the 2021 application cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2023, there were more programs that restricted osteopathic medical students from away rotations than programs that restricted allopathic medical students (12/194, 6.2% vs. 0/194, 0.0%; p < 0.001). All 12 programs were formerly ACGME-accredited before the integration into a single accreditation system. There was a decrease in the number of programs restricting osteopathic medical students from away rotations compared with the 2021 application cycle (18/194, 9.3% vs. 12/194, 6.2%; p = 0.254). Fees associated with away rotations ranged from $25 to $4,000 for both allopathic and osteopathic students. The number of programs that charged osteopathic medical students higher rotation fees than programs that charged allopathic students when compared with the 2021 application cycles decreased (1/194, 0.5% vs. 5/194, 2.6%; p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While some programs continue to have away rotation eligibility requirements that prohibit osteopathic medical students from rotating, only one residency program currently charges osteopathic medical students a higher fee to rotate than allopathic medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Thompson Versus Judet Techniques for Quadricepsplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes and Complications.","authors":"Caroline T Gutowski, Kathryn Hedden, Parker Johnsen, John E Dibato, Christopher Rivera-Pintado, Kenneth Graf","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00040","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadricepsplasty has been used for over half a century to improve range of motion (ROM) in knees with severe arthrofibrosis. Various surgical techniques for quadricepsplasty exist, including Judet and Thompson, as well as novel minimally invasive approaches. The goal of this review was to compare outcomes between quadricepsplasty techniques for knee contractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Available databases were queried for all articles on quadricepsplasty. Outcomes included postoperative ROM, outcome scores, and complication rates. Secondarily, we summarized rehabilitation protocols and descriptions of all modified and novel techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three articles comprising 797 patients were included in final analysis. Thirty-five percent of patients underwent Thompson quadricepsplasty, 36% underwent Judet, and 29% underwent other techniques. After Judet and Thompson quadricepsplasty, patients achieved a mean postoperative active flexion of 92.7° and 106.4°, respectively (p < 0.01). Complication rates after Judet and Thompson were 17% and 24%, respectively. Wound infection was the most frequently recorded complication after Judet, whereas extension lag predominated for Thompson.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the Thompson and Judet quadricepsplasty techniques offer successful treatment options to restore functional knee ROM. Although the Thompson technique resulted in greater postoperative knee flexion compared with the Judet, the difference may be attributable to differences in preoperative flexion and time from injury to quadricepsplasty. Overall, the difference in flexion gained between the 2 techniques is comparable and clinically negligible.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286254/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Gender Disparity in Authorship Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.","authors":"Elizabeth Cho, Mary V McCarthy, Victoria Hodkiewicz, Mia V Rumps, Mary K Mulcahey","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00061","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender disparity remains pervasive in orthopaedic surgery, which affects the research pursuits of orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to characterize gender-related authorship trends of orthopaedic surgery residents, including evaluation of gender-concordant publication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cross-sectional analysis of US orthopaedic surgery residency programs was performed. Information on residency programs and demographics of each cohort was collected. Publication metrics consisting of number of first and non-first author publications and H-indices were manually obtained for PGY-3 to PGY-5 residents attending the 25 programs ranked the highest for research output by Doximity. Gender of each resident and senior author was determined from institutional websites using photos, biographies, and preferred pronouns when available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 532 residents, 169 (31.8%) female and 363 (68.2%) male, were included for authorship analysis. Of them, 415 (78%) had at least one first author publication, which did not vary significantly by gender. Female residents had disproportionately fewer first author publications compared with their representation (22% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.00001). Female residents averaged fewer first and non-first author publications compared with male residents (2.8 vs. 4.6, p = 0.0003; 6.4 vs. 10, p = 0.0001 respectively). Despite fewer publications overall, a greater subset of publications by female residents were written in collaboration with a female senior author compared with publications by male residents (p < 0.0001). Male residents had a higher average H-index of 5.4 vs. 3.9 among female residents (p = 0.00007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar rates of first author publication among male and female residents, female residents had fewer publications overall, lower H-indices, and disproportionately fewer first author publications than would be expected given their representation. Findings from this study suggest that gender disparity in orthopaedic surgery extends to differences in research productivity as early as in residency. This may have negative implications on the career advancement of female orthopaedic surgeons. Additional work is needed to identify and understand biases in research productivity and career advancement, to promote more equitable strategies for academic achievement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262817/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.","authors":"","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00170","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Natural radiation exposure in the general population averages 3 milliSieverts (mSv) annually; however, radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents is not well defined. Despite protective measures, evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons is increasing. The purpose of this study was to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents and to determine the variability of exposure among post graduate year (PGY) of residency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monthly radiation exposure was measured prospectively over a 12-month period in orthopaedic surgery residents from a single program. Participants wore dosimeters above (\"exposed\") and beneath (\"shielded\") protective lead. The primary outcome measure was the absolute value of radiation exposure in mSv. Repeated measures analysis was used to assess exposure with age, sex, year of training, operating room (OR) days, and height.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean annual occupational radiation exposure was 3.30 ± 0.64 mSv over an average of 107 ± 38 OR days. Mean exposure per OR day was 0.033 ± 0.008 mSv. PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents had the highest cumulative exposure, and PGY-5 residents had the highest mean exposure per OR day (0.044 ± 0.009 mSv/d). Number of OR days per month and PGY level were significant predictors of radiation exposure (p < 0.05). Sex, age, and height were not significant in predicting radiation of the exposed dosimeter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Orthopaedic residents' exposure to radiation is nearly twice the general population's exposure. Given that yearly radiation exposure was highest during early residency years, but exposure based on number of OR days was highest in the final year of training, it is essential for resident education regarding radiation safety and safe clinical practices throughout their training.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}