JBJS Open Access最新文献

{"title":"Exploring Impact and Variability of Research Productivity Among Academic Orthopaedic Leaders.","authors":"Hassan Farooq, Andrew Gaetano, Krishin Shivdasani, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00085","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessing scholarly contributions in academic orthopaedic surgery remains challenging, despite the importance of publication productivity in evaluating academic leaders. The Hirsch (h)-index and its derivative, the m-index, offer objective measures to compare and evaluate publication productivity. The primary aims of this study were to compare h- and m-indices of department chairs and residency program directors of orthopaedic training programs in the United States and assess the association between h-index and program rank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A publicly available Doximity report was used to identify and rank orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. Internet-based searches of institution-specific websites were performed to confirm current department chairs and residency program directors as of January 2024. H-index data were collected from a publicly available database known as Scopus. The m-index was calculated as the quotient of h-index and years in practice. Gender and years in practice were obtained through available biographies on institution-specific websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Department chairs had significantly higher h- and m-indices at both the career and 5-year time intervals compared with program directors. Upon subgroup analysis, department chairs and program directors at top-10 ranked programs had significantly higher h- and m-indices compared with the entire population of department chairs and program directors. Linear regression analyses demonstrated a direct linear association between department chair/program director h- and m-indices and program rank.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Publication productivity was higher for department chairs than residency program directors. Orthopaedic leaders at top-10 institutions had higher publication productivity compared with those at institutions outside of the top 10, per Doximity rankings. Finally, there is substantial variation in publication productivity of orthopaedic surgeons in leadership roles at academic institutions in the United States.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study highlights the publication productivity of orthopaedic surgery department chairs and residency program directors and describes the linear association between publication productivity of academic orthopaedic leaders and program rank. This information can be utilized by those interested in learning more about the publication productivity among academic orthopaedic surgeons across different institutions and can assist those who are involved in the hiring and promotion process at these academic institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444580/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intrarater and Inter-rater Reliability of Tibial Plateau Fracture Classifications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Fardis Vosoughi, Iman Menbari Oskouie, Nazanin Rahimdoost, Amir Kasaeian, Arash Sherafat Vaziri","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00181","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of various tibial plateau fracture (TPF) classifications has been examined in recent literature using radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The question remains as to which classification system provides the highest reliability. In this systematic review, we are going to evaluate the overall interobserver and intraobserver reliability of various TPF classifications in different imaging modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In February 2023, predefined terms were used for database search (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science). Meta-analysis of intrarater and inter-rater kappa coefficients was performed for each of the classifications in each modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four studies were included in this review. Schatzker's classification was more frequently used than others. It had a better intrarater kappa coefficient than the Hohl and Moore and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classifications in radiography (κ = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.76, p < 0.01). The Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications had similar inter-rater reliability in the radiography modality (κ = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.51-0.54, p < 0.01; κ = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.5-0.55, p < 0.01; respectively). In 3-dimensional computed tomography, the Luo classification system showed the highest intrarater (κ = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.35-0.66) and inter-rater (κ = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.73-0.81) kappa coefficients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three-column classification proposed by Luo et al. was able to reach the highest degree and was the only classification with near-excellent inter-rater reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Declining Rate of International Medical Graduates Matching Into Orthopedic Surgery Residency Programs in the United States: A 17-Year Analysis.","authors":"Anisha Tyagi, Suleiman Y Sudah, Kathryn Whitelaw, Brett D Haislup, Tej Joshi, Pablo Sanchez-Urgelles, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, Mariano E Menendez","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00095","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>International medical graduates (IMGs) continue to play an important role in the US health care system, but little is known about their trends of matching into highly competitive residencies such as orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze temporal trends of IMG applicants matching into US orthopedic residency programs between 2008 and 2024 and compare them with US allopathic (MD) and osteopathic (DO) graduates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopedic residency specific data for years 2008 to 2024 was obtained from the National Resident Match Program and Electronic Residency Application Service. Variables collected included total number of programs, total positions offered, number of applicants (MD, DO, and IMG), positions filled, and fill rate for each group. Trends were examined using simple linear regression modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of orthopedic residency programs increased from 160 (2008) to 218 (2024), with total positions increasing from 636 (2008) to 916 (2024). The IMG fill rate decreased from 2.99% in 2008 to 0.87% in 2024 (<i>p</i> < 0.01 for linear trend; β -0.069). This corresponds to an absolute number decrease of 19 IMGs in 2008 to 8 in 2024. More specifically, the proportion of US IMGs decreased from 0.94% to 0.66%, and the proportion of non-US IMGs decreased from 2.04% to 0.21%. Over the 17-year study period, a total of 105 US IMGs and 110 non-US IMGs matched into orthopedic surgery. The US MD applicant fill rate decreased significantly from 96.5% to 85.0% (<i>p</i> < 0.001; β -0.944). The DO applicant fill rate increased significantly from 0.31% to 13.97% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001; β 0.990).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The declining rate of IMGs matching into orthopedic residency programs in the United States underscores the growing challenges faced by IMGs in accessing training in this competitive specialty. The notable increase in DO graduates securing orthopedic residency positions likely reflects the integration of a unified accreditation system for MD and DO residency programs established in 2020.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study; IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412703/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Orthopedic Surgical Backlogs Such as the One Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Adam P Henderson, Paul R Van Schuyver, Kostas J Economopoulos, Joshua S Bingham, Anikar Chhabra","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>➤ The COVID-19 pandemic created a persistent surgical backlog in elective orthopedic surgeries. ➤ Artificial intelligence (AI) uses computer algorithms to solve problems and has potential as a powerful tool in health care. ➤ AI can help improve current and future orthopedic backlogs through enhancing surgical schedules, optimizing preoperative planning, and predicting postsurgical outcomes. ➤ AI may help manage existing waitlists and increase efficiency in orthopedic workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410334/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Current State of International Academic Partnerships in Orthopaedic Surgery Between High-Income and Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Michael J Flores, Madeline C MacKechnie, Kelsey E Brown, Jamieson M O'Marr, Patricia Rodarte, Adrienne Socci, Theodore Miclau","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic academic partnerships between high-income countries (HICs) and low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are an effective method to increase research and scholarly support. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic literature review of the current state of partnerships worldwide and assess the quality, quantity, and content of their research output.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using 4 academic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Article eligibility criteria included articles published between January 2017 and 2022, with orthopaedic authors from at least 1 HIC and LMIC. Articles related to global orthopaedic surgery with exclusively HIC or LMIC authors were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database search yielded 25,928 articles, and after deduplication, 21,145 articles were included in the screening. After title and abstract screening, 408 articles underwent full-text review for eligibility. The final list of eligible articles for extraction included 310 publications in 127 journals. Published articles increased over time (46 in 2017 to 88 in 2021) and were most commonly published in the <i>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery</i> (20, 6.5%). Open-access articles (203, 65.5%) had a significantly greater Journal Citation Indicator (p = 0.024) than non-open-access articles. Most studies (40.7%) were observational, with few (3.6%) randomized controlled trials. Orthopaedic trauma (38.1%) was the most common subspecialty, followed by spine (14.8%) and pediatrics (14.2%). Most partnerships were sponsored by North American authors in 65 LMICs, primarily China, India, and the sub-Saharan African region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified 310 articles published by orthopaedic international academic partnerships in 106 countries over the past 5 years, demonstrating that collaborations between LMIC/HIC partners nearly doubled over the study period. Sixty-five percent of the articles were published in open-access journals.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392471/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Prospective Study of the IlluminOss Photodynamic Nail System for Pelvic Stabilization: Treatment of Impending and Actual Fractures from Metastatic Bone Disease, Multiple Myeloma, and Primary Bone Lymphoma.","authors":"Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Marcos R Gonzalez, Joseph O Werenski, Kayla Quinn, Diana Freiberger, Kevin A Raskin","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The stabilization of metastatic lesions in the periacetabular region can be successfully performed using percutaneous techniques. Photodynamic nails (PDNs) are among the available tools for stabilization. Data on postoperative complications and functional outcomes are, however, scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing percutaneous stabilization using PDNs (IlluminOss Medical) for impending or actual minimally displaced pathological fractures of the pelvis from metastatic bone disease, multiple myeloma, or primary bone lymphoma were enrolled prospectively. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the 2-day, 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year time points. Functional outcomes assessed included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, PROMIS Pain Interference, Combined Pain and Ambulatory Function (CPAF), EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores. Pain was assessed using a VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients treated with PDNs were included. The median VAS pain score dropped from 60 points preoperatively to 30 at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.004). The median CPAF score improved from 6 preoperatively to 7 postoperatively at the 6-week mark. The median EQ-VAS score showed significant improvement at 6 weeks (70 versus 50; p = 0.006). The median 2-week PROMIS Pain Interference score was significantly lower than preoperatively (64.1 versus 66.9; p = 0.03). An improvement in the median PROMIS Physical Function score was seen at 6 weeks following surgery compared with preoperatively (37 versus 30.1; p = 0.001). A significant improvement in the MSTS score was seen as soon as 2 days after surgery (77% versus 40%; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with pelvic bone metastases, multiple myeloma, or primary bone lymphoma, we found that treatment using PDNs resulted in immediate return to ambulation and rapid functional outcome improvement, with low complication rates. In this population, this technique represents a safe alternative to open surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392488/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical Outcomes Do Not Deteriorate Over Time Following Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up of 135 Shoulders.","authors":"Philipp Kriechling, Anna-Katharina Calek, Kimon Hatziisaak, Bettina Hochreiter, Samy Bouaicha, Karl Wieser","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) offers satisfactory mid-term outcomes for a variety of pathologies, but long-term follow-up data are limited. This study demonstrates the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as the predictive factors for an inferior outcome following RTSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the prospective database of a single, tertiary referral center, we included all primary RTSAs that were performed during the study period and had a minimum 10-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the absolute Constant-Murley score (CS), relative CS, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), range of motion, pain, complication rate, and reintervention rate. Radiographic measurements included the critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), distalization shoulder angle (DSA), reverse shoulder angle (RSA), acromiohumeral distance (ACHD), center of rotation, glenoid component height, notching, radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, and tuberosity resorption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 shoulders (133 patients) were available for analysis at a mean follow-up of 10.9 ± 1.6 years. The mean age was 69 ± 8 years, and 76 shoulders (76 patients; 56%) were female. For most of the clinical outcomes, initial improvements were observed in the short term and were sustained in the long term without notable deterioration, with >10-year follow-up values of 64 ± 16 for the absolute CS, 79% ± 18% for the relative CS, 79% ± 21% for the SSV, and 14 ± 3 for the CS for pain. However, after initial improvement, deterioration was seen for flexion and external rotation, with values of 117° ± 26° and 25° ± 18°, respectively, at the final follow-up. Scapular notching, heterotopic ossification, and radiolucent lines of <2 mm progressed during the study period. Younger age (p = 0.040), grade-II notching (p = 0.048), tuberosity resorption (p = 0.015), and radiolucent lines of <2 mm around the glenoid (p = 0.015) were predictive of an inferior outcome. The complication rate was 28%, with a reintervention rate of 11%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTSA provided improved long-term results that did not significantly deteriorate over time for most of the clinical parameters. Negative clinical outcome predictors were younger age, grade-II notching, tuberosity resorption, and radiolucent lines of <2 mm around the glenoid.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392479/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long-Term Results After Hallux Valgus Correction with Distal Metatarsal Reversed-L (ReveL) Osteotomy: Factors That Influence Recurrence and the Clinical Outcome.","authors":"Lizzy Weigelt, Noah Davolio, Carlos Torrez, Florian Haug, Nathalie Kühne, Stephan H Wirth","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of hallux valgus correction with a distal metatarsal reversed-L (ReveL) osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-eight patients (131 feet) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 14.2 years (range, 10 to 18 years). Weight-bearing foot radiographs were analyzed preoperatively, at 6 weeks postoperatively, and at the final follow-up for the following parameters: hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) congruence angle, sesamoid position, presence of the round sign, and first MTPJ arthritis. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) assessed postoperative pain and function. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses identified risk factors for hallux valgus recurrence and an inferior clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All radiographic parameters significantly improved at the 6-week follow-up and the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The recurrence rate (HVA >20°) was 14%. A preoperative HVA of >28° (odds ratio [OR], 9.1; p = 0.02) and a 6-week postoperative HVA of >15° (OR, 4.6; p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for recurrence. At the final follow-up, all FAOS subscales resembled high postoperative function (median, 100 points [range of the interquartile range (IQR), 81 to 100 points]). A preoperative body mass index of >30 kg/m² was associated with lower FAOS quality of life (QOL) (p = 0.04), and postoperative hallux varus was associated with lower FAOS activities of daily living (p = 0.048). Patients with first MTPJ arthritis of grade 2 or higher at the final follow-up had significantly lower FAOS subscales (p < 0.01) except for QOL. Hallux valgus recurrence did not influence the long-term outcome. A symptomatic implant was the main cause of revision (15%). In 94% of cases, the patients were satisfied with the hallux appearance and, in 92% of cases, the patients were satisfied with postoperative pain reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hallux valgus correction with a ReveL osteotomy led to high long-term satisfaction rates. A preoperative HVA of >28° and a 6-week postoperative HVA of >15° increased the risk of hallux valgus recurrence. First MTPJ arthritis was the leading cause of inferior clinical results, whereas radiographic hallux valgus recurrence had no impact on the clinical results. First MTPJ arthritis at the final follow-up was associated with an inferior clinical outcome, whereas radiographic hallux valgus recurrence had no impact on the long-term clinical results.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392477/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trends in Orthopaedic Surgery Fellowship Match Among Female Residents: Discrepancies in Sex Diversity by Subspecialty.","authors":"Malini Anand, Kaitlyn R Julian, Mary K Mulcahey, Stephanie E Wong","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a historic sex imbalance in the field of orthopaedic surgery in the United States, with female physicians being vastly underrepresented. In addition, this sex imbalance is particularly pronounced in certain subspecialties. As such, we sought to analyze the distribution of graduating female residents and their fellowship match trends from 2017 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Medical Association Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to identify all orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States during the 2016 to 2017 and the 2021 to 2022 academic years. The data were supplemented with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Book to include data on all ACGME-accredited programs in 2017 and 2022. The percentage of female orthopaedic surgery residents matching into each subspecialty was calculated. Continuous data were analyzed with independent <i>t</i> test, and significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2017 to 2022, there has been a significant increase in the percentage of female residents matching in orthopaedic surgery fellowships (14.6% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001). In the orthopaedic hand subspecialty, 24 (15.8%) female residents matched into a hand fellowship in 2017 vs. 56 (35.2%) in 2022 (p < 0.001). Spine, trauma, adult reconstruction, oncology, pediatrics, foot and ankle, shoulder and elbow, and sports medicine fellowships have not seen a significant change in the distribution of female residents matching over the past 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Between 2017 and 2022, the total number of female orthopaedic surgery fellows increased, and there was significant growth in the percentage of matched female fellows in the subspecialty of hand. Other orthopaedic subspecialties including spine, trauma, adult reconstruction, oncology, pediatrics, foot and ankle, shoulder and elbow, and sports medicine have seen no significant change in the distribution of women fellows over the past 5 years. Further investigation is warranted to determine factors leading to growth in certain fellowships among female residents to encourage sex diversity among all subspecialties in orthopaedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392489/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Robots on the Stage: A Snapshot of the American Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Market.","authors":"Avinash Inabathula, Dimitar I Semerdzhiev, Anand Srinivasan, Farid Amirouche, Lalit Puri, Hristo Piponov","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00063","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>» Computer-assisted robots aid orthopaedic surgeons in implant positioning and bony resection. Surgeons selecting a robot for their practice are faced with numerous options. This study aims to make the choice less daunting by reviewing the most commonly used Food and Drug Administration-approved robotic total knee arthroplasty platforms in the American arthroplasty market.» Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) robots use computer guidance to create a virtual knee model that serves as the surgeon's canvas for resection planning.» Most available robotic TKA (rTKA) systems are closed semiactive systems that restrict implant use to those of the manufacturer.» Each system has distinct imaging requirements, safety features, resection methods, and operating room footprints that will affect a surgeon's technique and practice.» Robots carry different purchase, maintenance, and equipment costs that will influence patient access across different socioeconomic groups.» Some studies show improved early patient-reported outcomes with rTKA, but long-term studies have yet to show clinical superiority over manual TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368221/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}