Finite Element Analysis of Patellofemoral Contact Pressure with Varying Fixation of Transverse Patella Fractures.

IF 3.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-07-17 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00032
Farid Amirouche, Majd Mzeihem, Jasper Hoag, Rohan Wangikar, Jason Koh
{"title":"Finite Element Analysis of Patellofemoral Contact Pressure with Varying Fixation of Transverse Patella Fractures.","authors":"Farid Amirouche, Majd Mzeihem, Jasper Hoag, Rohan Wangikar, Jason Koh","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding patellofemoral contact pressure is crucial for knee biomechanics, as abnormalities can lead to joint issues. This study investigates the changes in contact pressure after surgical fixation of patellar fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finite element model of the knee was created using cadaveric data on transverse patellar fractures. Models were analyzed and evaluated at 0°, 45°, and 90° flexion under quadriceps force to assess peak pressure, contact pattern, and pressure irregularity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The plate and wire fixation models exhibited distinct stress distribution patterns at 45° and 90° flexion angles. At 45°, the plate model had a higher peak stress (6.14 MPa) in a 21.0-mm ovular contact area, while the wire model had lower peak stress (2.42 MPa) in a smaller, more fragmented region. At 90°, the plate model exhibited concentrated stress (13.26 MPa) in a heart-shaped area, whereas the wire model had 3 dispersed stress points (9.88 MPa) over a broader surface. These findings highlight the plate model's greater stress concentration and the wire model's more irregular distribution of stress. At 0°, the plate model exhibited minimal contact pressure compared with the wire model, with a pressure of 6.67 MPa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The plate model better preserves patellofemoral biomechanics, potentially reducing complications and improving long-term outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm its superiority as a fixation method.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Although the prevalence of patellar fractures remains high, the gold-standard method for surgical fixation has a postoperative complication rate as high as 52.5%. Addressing the lack of understanding surrounding patellofemoral contact pressure in this scenario is an essential step toward improving outcomes for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding patellofemoral contact pressure is crucial for knee biomechanics, as abnormalities can lead to joint issues. This study investigates the changes in contact pressure after surgical fixation of patellar fractures.

Methods: Finite element model of the knee was created using cadaveric data on transverse patellar fractures. Models were analyzed and evaluated at 0°, 45°, and 90° flexion under quadriceps force to assess peak pressure, contact pattern, and pressure irregularity.

Results: The plate and wire fixation models exhibited distinct stress distribution patterns at 45° and 90° flexion angles. At 45°, the plate model had a higher peak stress (6.14 MPa) in a 21.0-mm ovular contact area, while the wire model had lower peak stress (2.42 MPa) in a smaller, more fragmented region. At 90°, the plate model exhibited concentrated stress (13.26 MPa) in a heart-shaped area, whereas the wire model had 3 dispersed stress points (9.88 MPa) over a broader surface. These findings highlight the plate model's greater stress concentration and the wire model's more irregular distribution of stress. At 0°, the plate model exhibited minimal contact pressure compared with the wire model, with a pressure of 6.67 MPa.

Conclusion: The plate model better preserves patellofemoral biomechanics, potentially reducing complications and improving long-term outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm its superiority as a fixation method.

Clinical relevance: Although the prevalence of patellar fractures remains high, the gold-standard method for surgical fixation has a postoperative complication rate as high as 52.5%. Addressing the lack of understanding surrounding patellofemoral contact pressure in this scenario is an essential step toward improving outcomes for these patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

髌骨横向骨折不同固定方式髌骨-股骨接触压力的有限元分析。
背景:了解髌股接触压力对膝关节生物力学至关重要,因为异常会导致关节问题。本研究探讨髌骨骨折手术固定后接触压力的变化。方法:利用横断髌骨骨折的尸体资料建立膝关节有限元模型。在股四头肌力作用下,对0°、45°和90°屈曲的模型进行分析和评估,以评估峰值压力、接触模式和压力不规则性。结果:板丝固定模型在45°和90°屈曲角处具有明显的应力分布规律。在45°时,板模型在21.0 mm的卵形接触区域具有较高的峰值应力(6.14 MPa),而线模型在更小、更破碎的区域具有较低的峰值应力(2.42 MPa)。在90°角处,板形模型在心形区域表现出集中的应力(13.26 MPa),而线形模型在更宽的表面上有3个分散的应力点(9.88 MPa)。这些发现突出了板模型更大的应力集中和线模型更不规则的应力分布。在0°时,与线模型相比,板模型的接触压力最小,为6.67 MPa。结论:钢板模型更好地保留了髌股生物力学,潜在地减少了并发症并改善了长期预后。作为一种固定方法,其优越性有待进一步研究。临床相关性:尽管髌骨骨折的发生率仍然很高,但手术固定的金标准方法术后并发症发生率高达52.5%。在这种情况下,解决对髌股接触压力缺乏了解是改善这些患者预后的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信