JBI evidence synthesis最新文献

{"title":"Effectiveness of combined physical and psychological interventions for anxiety and depression symptoms in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Sílvia Ramos, Aramid Gomes, Ana Rosinhas, Rosa Silva, Margarida Goes, Francisco Sampaio","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00335","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of combined physical and psychological interventions for anxiety and depression symptoms in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>By 2030, COPD is expected to be the third-leading cause of death and the seventh-leading cause of health problems in terms of overall health impact, measured in disability-adjusted life years. As with other comorbidities, anxiety and depressive disorders influence the prognosis. Combined physical and psychological interventions may have better results than isolated interventions for symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies of adult patients with COPD and anxiety and depression symptoms who have undergone combined physical and psychological interventions will be considered for inclusion. This review will primarily include randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles will be searched in CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Academic Search Complete, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection (via EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus. Two independent reviewers will select the studies and apply the JBI tools for critical appraisal and data extraction. Studies will be pooled in a meta-analysis whenever possible. The χ 2 test and I 2 statistics will be the standard tools for assessing heterogeneity. Statistical analyses will be carried out using the random-effects model. The fixed-effects model will be applied if there is low heterogeneity between included studies ( I 2  < 50, or P ≥ 0.5). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to grade the certainty of the evidence, and a Summary of Findings will be presented.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024550523.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1228-1235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143025060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Simulated clinical placements in health care education: a scoping review and evidence and gap map protocol.","authors":"Danielle Pollock, Charles Marley, Grace McBride, Mafalda Dias, Raju Kanukula, Sabira Hasanoff, Carrie Price, Matthew Tieu, Adam Montagu, Zachary Munn, Ellen Davies","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00298","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00298","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This protocol details the methods for a scoping review that will examine the evidence on the design, implementation, delivery, and evaluation of simulated clinical placements.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical placements allow health professions students to apply theoretical knowledge in clinical settings. For various economical, practical, and preferential reasons, some programs and institutions have trialed and established simulated clinical placements.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will include sources that have examined the design, implementation, delivery, and evaluation of simulated clinical placements in tertiary undergraduate and postgraduate education programs for health professions. Primary research studies, evidence syntheses, discussion articles, and commentaries will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will be conducted according to the JBI guidance for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The following electronic databases will be searched: PubMed (NCBI), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost). Forward and backward citation searching of the included evidence sources will be conducted. At least 2 reviewers will assess sources for eligibility at title and abstract, and full-text screening stage, and extract data from included sources. Data will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis and frequencies and will be presented as a narrative summary. Data will also be presented in an evidence and gap map, and as tables and other visual summaries.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/dy4g6.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1207-1220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143493902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Metacognitive interventions for mental health disorders in adolescents: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Andreia Espírito Santo, Rosa Silva, Ryan Balzan, Lara Guedes de Pinho, Francisco Sampaio","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00210","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review is to map and summarize metacognitive interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Metacognitive interventions are widely implemented in adults across various types of mental health disorders. Use in adolescents (aged between 10 and 19 years) has already been proposed in the recent literature, despite this knowledge being scattered. Hence, it is necessary to summarize the types of metacognitive interventions, their key characteristics, the mental health disorders they are targeting, and their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider quantitative and qualitative, as well as mixed methods studies describing metacognitive interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders. All intervention settings will be eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-step search strategy will be adopted, in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. We will search for peer-reviewed papers on CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO, and Scopus, among others. Gray literature identified by searches on OpenGrey and MedNar will also be included. The reference lists of all selected full-text reviews will be searched. There will be no limitations on the year or language of publication. Screening, selection, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers, who will screen titles and abstracts of publications meeting the inclusion criteria as well as review the full text of eligible studies. Disagreements will be resolved through plenary discussion or with the help of an additional reviewer. The extracted data will be summarized narratively and presented in a table.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/kh2bc.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1257-1265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143459709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effectiveness of school-based programs for type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention for school children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Nareemarn Neelapaichit, Ratchanok Phonyiam, Porawan Witwaranukool","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00135","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review will be to synthesize the effectiveness of school-based programs for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prevention for school children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Schools function as a fundamental platform for communicating health-related knowledge, such as information on preventing chronic diseases such as diabetes. However, the effectiveness of school-based programs for preventing T2DM in children and adolescents remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider both experimental and quasi-experimental study designs, including randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, before and after studies, and interrupted time-series studies. School children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years (in Grades 1 to 12) of any ethnicity will be considered. This review will consider studies on T2DM prevention and education programs in school settings. Comparators will include no treatment, standard care, or waitlist controls, with outcomes covering diabetes risk factors, knowledge, health literacy, insulin sensitivity, fasting blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin. These parameters will be assessed using validated instruments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The databases to be searched will include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Two independent reviewers will select studies, critically appraise them using the standard JBI critical appraisal instruments, and extract data. Studies will be pooled in a meta-analysis or presented narratively. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to grade the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024499998.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1191-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369499/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143469433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Midwifery students' perceptions and learning experiences during clinical practice: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Zhihui Yang, Fengyi Zhang, Xingwen Li, Dongmei Mao, Ruiqi Lu, Le Zhang, Xinyi Zhang, Rixuan Feng, Lili Zhang, Ning Wang","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00165","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to investigate, critically appraise, and synthesize qualitative evidence related to midwifery student perceptions and learning experiences during clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midwifery students are expected to acquire strong competencies during pre-registration education. Clinical practice offers valuable opportunities for the students to develop essential practical capacities. Gaining insights into the perceptions and experiences of midwifery students in relation to their clinical practice is significant for devising effective strategies for clinical education. The literature shows a range of qualitative studies conducted to focus on these aspects. While a single study may not comprehensively capture all the experience, this review aggregated existing qualitative evidence to inform the development of more effective clinical education programs.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review included studies that explored midwifery students' perceptions and experiences in relation to their clinical practice in any practical settings. The review focused on qualitative data of various designs, including phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and mixed methods research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-stage search was conducted to include published and unpublished articles. Databases searched included PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science (all collections), and gray literature. Papers published in English were considered. Data were extracted using a standardized tool. Data synthesis adhered to the meta-aggregative approach to categorize findings. The categories were synthesized into a set of findings to inform midwifery practical education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review encompassed 32 qualitative studies. A total of 212 findings were extracted and classified into 21 distinct categories, which then generated 3 synthesized findings related to midwifery students' adaptation to clinical environment, clinical teaching and mentorship, and student learning and development. The overall study quality, assessed using ConQual, was rated as moderate, with moderate dependability and high credibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights a need to support midwifery students to access their practical learning experience in order to develop essential professional capabilities. Strategies may include building a positive clinical learning environment to support the students' adaptation, identifying their specific learning needs, and applying effective mentoring strategies.</p><p><strong>Supplemental digital content: </strong>A Mandarin-language version of the abstract of this review is available at: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A97 .</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1077-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144030925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Strategies to support the mental health and well-being of migrant LGBTQIA+ college and university students: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Roya Haghiri-Vijeh, Christine Huel, Ilo-Katryn Maimets, Janet Montague, Nancy Clark, Nigel Mantou Lou, Edward Ou Jin Lee","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00148","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will identify and explore strategies employed by health care professionals, higher education institutions, and organizations to support the mental health and well-being of migrant lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and more (LGBTQIA+) college and university students.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Migrant LGBTQIA+ students face substantial challenges to their identity formation and social development while studying in their newly settled countries. Little is known about how colleges and universities support LGBTQIA+ students' mental health and well-being from the perspectives of migration status, stigma, and discrimination. Understanding what is known about strategies to support migrant LGBTQIA+ students can inform future policy directions for promoting LGBTQIA+ mental health and well-being in the context of higher education.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will incorporate literature from all geographical contexts that focuses on strategies to support the mental health and well-being of migrant LGBTQIA+ college and university students. Literature not related to LGBTQIA+ migrant students will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI methodology for scoping reviews will be followed, and the review will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Several databases and sources of gray literature will be searched from 2004 onward. The review will include literature published in any language and will be independently screened by 2 reviewers. A modified JBI data extraction tool will be used and data will be presented as diagrams along with narrative summaries to answer the review questions.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/bj2hu/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1274-1282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143459624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effectiveness, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions for diabetes self-management in adults with or without hypertension: an umbrella review protocol.","authors":"Min Zhang, Jiahui Ge, Xinrong Yu, Tian Wang, Fenglan Wang, Madalo Gloria Kalero Kuchawo, Li Ge","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00263","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will synthesize evidence on the effectiveness, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions in implementing and maintaining effective self-management among adults (≥ 18 years) with diabetes, with or without comorbid hypertension.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes and hypertension are becoming the most challenging global health burdens. Growing evidence underscores the effectiveness of digital health interventions for diabetes and hypertension. However, it is unclear whether these strategies can be recommended to improve diabetes self-management among adults with or without hypertension in primary health care.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We will include systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis) examining the effectiveness, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions in improving self-management behaviors among adults living with diabetes, with or without hypertension, in primary health care. There will be no gender, ethnicity, language, or geographic limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for umbrella reviews. MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Campbell Systematic Reviews, and JBI EBP Database (Ovid) will be searched from inception to the present to identify systematic reviews. Gray literature sources, including OpenGrey, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and Google Scholar, will be searched, followed by a manual search of reference lists of included articles. Two independent reviewers will perform screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction. The review results will be presented through various approaches, including a narrative synthesis, graphical representation, and tabular summary. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses will be applied. Certainty of evidence will be assessed following the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023471615.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1198-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143459634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"\"Further details are needed!\" Reflections on the reporting in quantitative systematic reviews submitted to JBI Evidence Synthesis.","authors":"Jo Leonardi-Bee","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00508","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00508","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>JBI Evidence Synthesis receives quantitative systematic reviews that employ a wide range of high-quality and innovative methods to address their review questions. While the systematic reviews must follow JBI methodologies or those endorsed by JBI, common issues are noted related to the methods and results of systematic reviews. This commentary describes the 4 most common issues identified across quantitative systematic reviews from the experience of a senior associate editor of the journal.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 6","pages":"1038-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144267511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Defining and characterizing the role of the liaison in supporting 2SLGBTQIA+ people to navigate health-service settings: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Allie Slemon, Ingrid Handlovsky, Jaymelyn Hubert, Bernadette Zakher, Jessica Mussell, Jess Crawford, Dara Gan, Sage Schmied","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00261","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review seeks to identify what is known about the role of liaisons who support two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, and asexual (2SLGBTQIA+) people receiving care in health-service settings, and specifically how the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is defined and characterized.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To mitigate the stigma and discrimination experienced by 2SLGBTQIA+ people in health-service settings, a 2SLBGTQIA+ liaison position was created at a Canadian hospital. A comprehensive understanding of the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is integral to the implementation of 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison positions in health-service settings globally; however, a thorough understanding of the role remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This scoping review will consider literature that discusses the role of liaisons supporting 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals in health-service settings. No limitations will be placed on publication date, age, geography, liaison position title, or the professional, disciplinary, or educational background of the liaison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), LGBTQ+ Source (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science, as well as ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles; discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or through a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using an extraction tool developed by the research team. Findings will be presented in tabular/diagram format along with a narrative summary to highlight key themes related to the review question.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/rkx6j.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 6","pages":"1221-1227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144267512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploring the application of acceptance and commitment therapy by occupational therapy practitioners: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"John V Rider, Abigail E LaVerdure","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The proposed scoping review aims to explore the literature on the use of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) by occupational therapy (OT) practitioners, including how OT practitioners use ACT in the evaluation or intervention process, what types of client concerns they are addressing through ACT, in what settings they are using ACT, and what outcomes are being reported.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ACT is a third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy that is effective across a wide range of diagnoses commonly seen by OT practitioners. Given the increased use of ACT by OT practitioners, a comprehensive understanding of its use in clinical practice would benefit OT practitioners, referring health care providers, and clients, as well as informing future research.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The proposed review will consider studies that include participants of any age or diagnosis receiving OT services that involve ACT. All pertinent published studies will be considered, without limit on publication date or restriction on publication language. All primary studies, gray literature, text and opinion papers, and clinical guidelines will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed review will follow JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), OTSeeker, OTDBase, SciELO, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, MedNar, and Google Scholar. All relevant sources will be screened by 2 reviewers independently, and data will be extracted using a standardized tool modified for the review. The results will be presented with frequency tables and narrative summaries.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/ngzkq.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 5","pages":"1030-1037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144022586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}