Allie Slemon, Ingrid Handlovsky, Jaymelyn Hubert, Bernadette Zakher, Jessica Mussell, Jess Crawford, Dara Gan, Sage Schmied
{"title":"确定和描述联络员在支持2SLGBTQIA+人群在卫生服务环境中发挥的作用:范围审查方案。","authors":"Allie Slemon, Ingrid Handlovsky, Jaymelyn Hubert, Bernadette Zakher, Jessica Mussell, Jess Crawford, Dara Gan, Sage Schmied","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review seeks to identify what is known about the role of liaisons who support two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, and asexual (2SLGBTQIA+) people receiving care in health-service settings, and specifically how the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is defined and characterized.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To mitigate the stigma and discrimination experienced by 2SLGBTQIA+ people in health-service settings, a 2SLBGTQIA+ liaison position was created at a Canadian hospital. A comprehensive understanding of the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is integral to the implementation of 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison positions in health-service settings globally; however, a thorough understanding of the role remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This scoping review will consider literature that discusses the role of liaisons supporting 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals in health-service settings. No limitations will be placed on publication date, age, geography, liaison position title, or the professional, disciplinary, or educational background of the liaison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), LGBTQ+ Source (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science, as well as ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles; discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or through a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using an extraction tool developed by the research team. Findings will be presented in tabular/diagram format along with a narrative summary to highlight key themes related to the review question.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/rkx6j.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 6","pages":"1221-1227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining and characterizing the role of the liaison in supporting 2SLGBTQIA+ people to navigate health-service settings: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Allie Slemon, Ingrid Handlovsky, Jaymelyn Hubert, Bernadette Zakher, Jessica Mussell, Jess Crawford, Dara Gan, Sage Schmied\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review seeks to identify what is known about the role of liaisons who support two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, and asexual (2SLGBTQIA+) people receiving care in health-service settings, and specifically how the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is defined and characterized.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To mitigate the stigma and discrimination experienced by 2SLGBTQIA+ people in health-service settings, a 2SLBGTQIA+ liaison position was created at a Canadian hospital. A comprehensive understanding of the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is integral to the implementation of 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison positions in health-service settings globally; however, a thorough understanding of the role remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This scoping review will consider literature that discusses the role of liaisons supporting 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals in health-service settings. No limitations will be placed on publication date, age, geography, liaison position title, or the professional, disciplinary, or educational background of the liaison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), LGBTQ+ Source (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science, as well as ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles; discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or through a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using an extraction tool developed by the research team. Findings will be presented in tabular/diagram format along with a narrative summary to highlight key themes related to the review question.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/rkx6j.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"1221-1227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本综述旨在确定在卫生服务机构中支持双性恋、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿、双性人和无性恋者(2SLGBTQIA+)的联络人的已知作用,特别是如何定义和表征2SLGBTQIA+联络人的作用。简介:为了减轻2SLGBTQIA+人群在卫生服务机构中遭受的耻辱和歧视,加拿大一家医院设立了2SLGBTQIA+联络员职位。全面了解2SLGBTQIA+联络人的作用对于在全球卫生服务机构中实施2SLGBTQIA+联络人职位是不可或缺的;然而,对这一角色的透彻理解仍不清楚。纳入标准:本范围审查将考虑讨论在卫生服务机构中支持2SLGBTQIA+个体的联络员作用的文献。对出版日期、年龄、地理位置、联络员职位、或联络员的专业、学科或教育背景没有限制。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法进行范围综述。检索数据库将包括MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), LGBTQ+ Source (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science,以及ProQuest博士论文和灰色文献论文。两名独立审稿人将筛选标题、摘要和全文文章;差异将通过协商一致或通过第三方审稿人解决。数据将使用研究小组开发的提取工具进行提取。调查结果将以表格/图表形式呈现,并附有一份叙述性摘要,以突出与审查问题有关的关键主题。评审注册:Open Science Framework osf.io/rkx6j。
Defining and characterizing the role of the liaison in supporting 2SLGBTQIA+ people to navigate health-service settings: a scoping review protocol.
Objective: This scoping review seeks to identify what is known about the role of liaisons who support two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, and asexual (2SLGBTQIA+) people receiving care in health-service settings, and specifically how the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is defined and characterized.
Introduction: To mitigate the stigma and discrimination experienced by 2SLGBTQIA+ people in health-service settings, a 2SLBGTQIA+ liaison position was created at a Canadian hospital. A comprehensive understanding of the 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison role is integral to the implementation of 2SLGBTQIA+ liaison positions in health-service settings globally; however, a thorough understanding of the role remains unclear.
Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider literature that discusses the role of liaisons supporting 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals in health-service settings. No limitations will be placed on publication date, age, geography, liaison position title, or the professional, disciplinary, or educational background of the liaison.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), LGBTQ+ Source (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science, as well as ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles; discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or through a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using an extraction tool developed by the research team. Findings will be presented in tabular/diagram format along with a narrative summary to highlight key themes related to the review question.
Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/rkx6j.