{"title":"“需要更多的细节！”对提交给JBI证据综合的定量系统评价报告的思考。","authors":"Jo Leonardi-Bee","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>JBI Evidence Synthesis receives quantitative systematic reviews that employ a wide range of high-quality and innovative methods to address their review questions. While the systematic reviews must follow JBI methodologies or those endorsed by JBI, common issues are noted related to the methods and results of systematic reviews. This commentary describes the 4 most common issues identified across quantitative systematic reviews from the experience of a senior associate editor of the journal.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 6","pages":"1038-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Further details are needed!\\\" Reflections on the reporting in quantitative systematic reviews submitted to JBI Evidence Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Jo Leonardi-Bee\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>JBI Evidence Synthesis receives quantitative systematic reviews that employ a wide range of high-quality and innovative methods to address their review questions. While the systematic reviews must follow JBI methodologies or those endorsed by JBI, common issues are noted related to the methods and results of systematic reviews. This commentary describes the 4 most common issues identified across quantitative systematic reviews from the experience of a senior associate editor of the journal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"1038-1040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Further details are needed!" Reflections on the reporting in quantitative systematic reviews submitted to JBI Evidence Synthesis.
JBI Evidence Synthesis receives quantitative systematic reviews that employ a wide range of high-quality and innovative methods to address their review questions. While the systematic reviews must follow JBI methodologies or those endorsed by JBI, common issues are noted related to the methods and results of systematic reviews. This commentary describes the 4 most common issues identified across quantitative systematic reviews from the experience of a senior associate editor of the journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
