JBI evidence synthesis最新文献

{"title":"Allied health assistants in the Australian workforce: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Lori Roberts, Bea Staley, Kristy Logan","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00499","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to identify and map the available literature on how allied health assistants are utilized in Australia.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allied health assistants have the potential to increase service delivery output for the allied health workforce; however, barriers to successful implementation remain across allied health contexts. Identifying and mapping the clinical contexts in which relevant literature exists can i) identify the scope of parameters defining the allied health assistant role specific to practice contexts/settings and ii) inform development of evidence-based training for both allied health professional and assistant programs.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will include peer-reviewed and gray literature in which allied health assistant services are implemented. Literature that deals with supervision, organizational planning, and therapeutic outcomes will be considered for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Health and Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health (Gale Onefile), Scopus, Web of Science, and Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (ProQuest) will be systematically searched for published research. We will also hand-search reference lists from relevant papers and sources of gray literature. The review will include work based in Australia and published in English with full-text availability. Findings will be presented graphically to support visual analysis, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/mhb4v.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1847-1854"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144102839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Health care worker trust in the health care system, pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Nickolas J Cherwinski, Lorelei Newton, Lenora Marcellus, Bernadette Zakher, Jessica Mussell","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00371","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to identify the team, leadership, and organizational characteristics, behaviors, and traits that have created or reduced health care worker trust in the health care system pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective is to categorize the findings using the health care ecosystem as a descriptive framework (ie, teams, leadership, organizations, systems).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trusting relationships and trustworthy organizational cultures promote employee well-being, satisfaction, and retention. High levels of trust are associated with ethical and just workplaces as well as high-functioning organizations with enhanced patient experiences. Emerging trust research in a post-pandemic climate correlates high health care worker trust with higher levels of patient trust, suggesting contributions to healthier workplaces and improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The population is health care workers, the concept is trust, and the context is the health care system. We will consider all health care workers in any health care setting, in any country or position. All relevant published and unpublished studies will be considered, with no date or language limitations, including all primary studies, gray literature, and textual papers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews, including the JBI approach to critical appraisal, study selection, data extraction, and data synthesis. Two reviewers will independently extract data from selected papers using a standardized tool modified for the review. Results will be presented using frequency tables, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1863-1869"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144508677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessment of clinical skills in laboratory settings in prelicensure health education programs: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Karen Eileen Furlong, Jaime Riley, Alexis McGill, Richelle Witherspoon, Patricia Morris, Rose McCloskey, Renee Gordon, Lisa Keeping-Burke","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map the available literature on the assessment of clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prelicensure health programs are facing growing challenges in delivering learning experiences that sufficiently prepare students for safe practice as clinical settings contend with workforce shortages, rising workload demands, and increasingly complex patient populations. One safety component is the assessment of clinical skills prior to entering practice and caring for patients. Laboratory experiences generally include opportunities for hands-on practice and demonstration of a new clinical skill, including skills such as medication administration or infection prevention and control measures. This scoping review is necessary as laboratory assessments play a crucial role in providing insights into students' readiness to perform relevant clinical skills prior to caring for patients in practice settings.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will consider qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies on approaches and strategies used by faculty, staff, and/or students when assessing clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs. Assessment of postlicensure health care professionals' clinical skills will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Embase.com), ERIC (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest), and Google (with advanced search strategies). Two independent reviewers will screen citations for inclusion as well as conducting data extraction and analysis. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Data will be presented in tables and charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ5BU.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144795785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigating multilevel language interventions targeting spoken production in post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Grace Aryee, Jade Cartwright, Denis Visentin, Janet Webster, Anne Whitworth","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will identify multilevel language interventions that target spoken language production in aphasia following stroke and describe their characteristics, the theoretical predictions of the approaches, and what tools are used to measure outcomes.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multilevel aphasia interventions target more than one linguistic level in a sequential and/or simultaneous way. Recent research has shown that treating multiple levels of language processing in the same intervention can broaden treatment effectiveness and provide greater evidence of therapy gains transferring to untreated language skills and impacting broader participation and quality of life than focusing on language levels in isolation. Currently, there is no synthesis or analysis of multilevel aphasia interventions in the literature that might help understand the components that may contribute to these potential benefits. Conducting a scoping review will allow us to systematically explore the nature of these multilevel interventions, their proposed outcomes, and highlight directions for clinical practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will consider aphasia intervention studies that aim to improve spoken production through involving more than one linguistic level in the intervention. Studies will include people with post-stroke aphasia irrespective of aphasia type, severity, or time post-onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus will be searched for published articles. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for relevance against the inclusion criteria. Data will be presented in tables, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/4y7me.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144795786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alternative grading approaches in health professions education: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Elena Wong Espiritu, Aine O'Connor, Sara Blass, Kathryn L Dambrino, Angela Shelton Clauson","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00525","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to map the existing literature on alternative grading approaches in health professions education, and how these approaches are implemented.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although traditional alphanumerical tiered grading methods are widely used in health professions education, this approach is typically insufficient in providing descriptive feedback, allowing formative assessment, and promoting deeper learning and clinical application. Alternative grading approaches, including competency-based assessment, pass-fail grading, ungrading, specifications grading, and others, are increasingly being implemented, but there is a gap in understanding which approaches are being used in which health professions programs, and how the approaches are being implemented.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This scoping review will focus on literature discussing alternative grading approaches, which are any formative, summative, or cumulative assessments that have been built outside the traditional alphanumerical tiered grading systems. The population will include health professions students, which include nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, physicians, and allied health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Both published and unpublished literature will be located through a search strategy across PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, Scopus, and gray literature sources. Information sources will be searched from inception to November 2024. Two independent reviewers will screen potential sources of evidence against the prespecified eligibility criteria. No date limits will be applied, and only articles published in English or with a published English translation will be included. Data will be extracted, and the results will be synthesized and presented in a tabular format.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/2czq8.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145337643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Geographic search filters: promising tools for contextualizing research.","authors":"Catharina Muente, Alexander Pachanov, Julian Hirt, Lynda Ayiku, Dawid Pieper","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00344","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00344","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 8","pages":"1511-1513"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144838098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Improving neurodiversity awareness in school students: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Mandira Hiremath, Nerelie Freeman, Mohammed Alshawsh, Alexandra Ure","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00315","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map and characterize existing programs present in mainstream schools internationally that are targeted at improving children's awareness about neurodiversity.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurodiversity is a term used to describe human neurocognitive heterogeneity. Increased understanding and awareness about neurodiversity among school students has the potential to improve general student health and well-being. However, there is currently no standardized approach to raising children's awareness about neurodiversity in schools, and the associated literature is diffuse.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Literature will be included if it describes or evaluates programs designed to be delivered in mainstream schools aimed at increasing awareness of neurodiversity among students aged 5 to 18 years, regardless of geographical location. Published, unpublished, and gray literature from 2013 to the present will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An academic literature search will be conducted across 5 databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and ERIC (ProQuest). A gray literature search will also be performed across sources including ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and Google Scholar, as well as targeted websites, expert opinion, and reference lists of relevant peer-reviewed literature. Articles will be selected based on eligibility criteria. Data extraction will be conducted independently by 2 extractors using a predetermined form documenting study methods, population, interventions, and outcomes. Analysis and presentation of results will be reported according to the review objectives.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/6b378.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1624-1632"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143493891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Oncology care humanization in adults: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Ana Sofia Lopes, Ana Lúcia Ribeiro, Bárbara Lamas, Daniela Santos, Davide Fernandes, Rosa Silva, Paulo Marques","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00295","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00295","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this review is to identify and map health professionals' attitudes and behaviors that promote humanization of the care provided to adults with cancer, regardless of disease stage or treatment nature, in all health care provision contexts.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the challenging context of oncology care, it is imperative to adopt a humanized care paradigm. This paradigm should foster a relationship of respect and compassion between health professionals and people with oncological disease, and interventions should be sensitive to their values, culture, and human dignity.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Sources involving health professionals' attitudes and behaviors focused on promoting humanization of the health care provided to adults with oncological diseases, across the disease continuum, will be considered for this review. Eligible sources will explore humanized care as an approach that incorporates the following attributes: integrity, excellence, compassion and collaboration, altruism, respect and resilience, empathy, and service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Publications will be identified via MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL Complete, MedicLatina, and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection (all via EBSCOhost); Scopus; and Web of Science. Additionally, backward and forward citation searches will be conducted, as will a thorough investigation of gray literature in Science.gov and MedNar. The studies identified will be screened by 2 reviewers independently based on the title and abstract, and then reviewed at the full-text level. The data will be extracted using a tool developed by the authors. The results will be summarized and presented in tables accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/56ev9/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1671-1679"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143732139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tools used to assess methodological quality of primary mixed methods or multi-method studies: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Cindy Stern, Heather Loveday, Christina Godfrey, Danielle Pollock, Quan Nha Hong, Kendra Rieger, Matthew Stephenson, Nisha Kurian, Jacopo Fiorini, Lucylynn Lizarondo","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00569","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00569","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this proposed scoping review is to identify the tools available to assess the methodological quality of primary mixed methods or multi-method studies, and to determine the type and extent of psychometric testing and properties evaluated.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, JBI does not have an appraisal tool for primary mixed methods or multi-methods studies and recommends reviewers use the JBI qualitative tool and the relevant quantitative tool (based on study design) together. While useful, this does not allow reviewers to consider elements specifically related to the nuances of primary mixed methods studies.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Any tool, checklist, scale, instrument, criteria, system, or framework that has been designed to assess the methodological quality of primary mixed methods or multi-methods studies will be of interest. Adapted or modified versions of tools will also be considered, and any psychometric properties measured will be recorded. Published and unpublished primary studies, reviews, and textual evidence are eligible for inclusion in the review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow JBI methodology for scoping reviews and be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The following databases and resources will be searched: CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), PubMed, PsycINFO (OvidSP), Embase, Scopus, medRxiv, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (ProQuest), OSF, and Google Scholar. Various websites will also be searched. No language limits will be placed. Screening, data extraction, and data analysis will be conducted by 2 reviewers independently. Descriptive statistics and basic content analysis will be used to convey the results of the review, supplemented by a narrative synthesis and presented in tabular and graphical format.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/da9th.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1609-1615"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144037652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diversity of group cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Makoto Kawahito, Keitaro Murayama, Hirofumi Tomiyama, Kenta Kato, Akira Matsuo, Nami Nishida, Kou Matsukuma, Tomohiro Nakao","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00380","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will identify and compare diverse approaches to group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CBT is an established treatment for OCD. Although the benefits of group CBT are well known, its practice varies widely. Despite the growing number of studies on group CBT, the extent of heterogeneity in its structure and content has not been examined.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Eligibility criteria will include adult patients (18 years or older) of any gender, with a primary diagnosis of OCD. Articles must report on group CBT implemented as a treatment, specifically focusing on the number, frequency, duration, and format of sessions; number of participants; program content; and therapists' profession. The review will include both experimental and quasi-experimental designs, analytical observational studies, qualitative research, mixed methods studies, and textual evidence from key documents. Conference abstracts, research protocols, and systematic reviews will also be examined. All cultures, geographical contexts, races, and therapeutic settings will be considered. While subgroup analyses (eg, cultural or geographical variations) will not be conducted quantitatively due to the scoping nature of this review, relevant subgroup differences will be explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished articles in English and Japanese from database inception to the present will be searched for in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, the Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MedNar, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers will screen papers against predetermined eligibility criteria and extract data for specific variables. Data will be presented as tables and figures, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/smqjx/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1687-1694"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144053458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}