JBI evidence synthesis最新文献

{"title":"Immune biomarkers and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Alice Terrett, Magalie Van Loo, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan, David Brealey, Mervyn Singer, Jessica Manson, Eamon Patrick Raith","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify immunological pathways and markers of severity of illness associated with clinical outcomes that may represent potential therapeutic targets in the management of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A broad range of immunomodulatory therapies is used to manage hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, however the supporting evidence for these therapies is scarce. Identifying patients likely to experience more severe disease, or die, is currently extremely difficult, if not impossible. The identification of implicated cytokines in secondary disease can provide further support for the identification of high-risk patients and the development of targeted therapies.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies reporting immune biomarker and cytokine measurement in adult patients (age >18 years) with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) databases will be searched, without date limitations. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. Relevant sources will be retrieved, and their citation details imported into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrated care for adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Mulugeta Bayisa Chala, Jacobi Elliott, G Ross Baker, David M Walton, Micheline Steele, Siobhan Schabrun","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00534","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to describe the current evidence exploring integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integrated model of care is an emerging approach to delivering person-centered care. Integrated care supports the management of people with major chronic health conditions; however, the evidence behind its use to support people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders is scant. This scoping review will synthesize how integrated care is conceptualized, delivered, and evaluated for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. The review will also synthesize the attributes, components, elements, goals, frequently evaluated outcomes, theories/frameworks, and facilitators and barriers to delivering this model among people with musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies conducted on the delivery and/or evaluation of integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders in any health care setting (eg, primary, secondary, tertiary) and/or geographical location (countries, cultures) will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI scoping review methodology. Databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), the JBI EBP Database, PEDRO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and Web of Science, as well as sources of gray literature will be thoroughly searched. Papers published in all languages will be considered. Two reviewers will independently review the selected articles and extract data using a data extraction tool developed for this scoping review. The analysis will involve numerical and descriptive summaries of the selected articles and will be presented using graphs and tables, in line with Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Informal caregivers' feeding experiences for children with cancer: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Donruedee Kamkhoad, Tippawan Srichalerm, Porawan Witwaranukool","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to synthesize the experiences of informal caregivers' feeding practices for children with cancer.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Changes in eating among children with cancer impact their nutritional status, leading to several negative outcomes. In addition to interventions given by health care providers, informal caregivers' experiences in feeding these children are worth exploring.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative studies or the qualitative component of mixed method studies examining informal caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cancer under 18 years old, published in English or Thai in any year up to the present.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic reviews. A full search strategy for MEDLINE (PubMed) was developed from an initial limited search of MEDLINE (PubMed) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) to identify articles on the topic. The search strategy will be adapted for each database, including Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), LILACS (BVS), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and ThaiJO (TCI). The reference lists of studies included in the review will be hand-searched for additional studies. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will also be searched. Two reviewers will separately screen for eligible studies, perform the critical appraisal, and extract data. They will then synthesize via meta-aggregation and summarize the data. The final synthesized findings will be graded using the ConQual approach to establish confidence in the qualitative research synthesis.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024501382.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Epidemiological burden of inborn errors of metabolism in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Kavita Kachroo, Annie NithiyaVathani Johnson, S A K Moinudeen, Jitendra Sharma, Cheryl Holly","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review examines the evidence on the incidence and prevalence of inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>IEMs are a set of conditions that can either be inherited or result from spontaneous mutations. Although each condition is rare in isolation, various specific disorders within the IEM group have an estimated global prevalence of 50.9 per 100,000 live births. A precise estimate of the prevalence and incidence of IEM in LMICs can help determine the necessity for extensive newborn screening programs.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will cover studies conducted in LMICs, reporting on IEMs in infants and children under the age of 5 years. Studies that calculate birth prevalence and incidence of IEM will be included. Studies that provide information on the causes, clinical characteristics, treatment, case fatality rates, mortality rates, and other outcomes will also be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases to be searched include PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and gray literature sources. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Our search will encompass analytical and descriptive observational studies, which will be critically appraised by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using JBI data extraction tools. If sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be performed. Alternatively, if data are limited, we will present our findings in narrative format using tables and figures.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023457421.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nursing strategies to address health disparities in genomics-informed care: a scoping review.","authors":"Jacqueline Limoges, Patrick Chiu, Dzifa Dordunoo, Rebecca Puddester, April Pike, Tessa Wonsiak, Bernadette Zakher, Lindsay Carlsson, Jessica K Mussell","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00009","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00009","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this review was to map the available global evidence on strategies that nurses can use to facilitate genomics-informed health care to address health disparities to inform the development of a research and action agenda.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;The integration of genomics into health care is improving patient outcomes through better prevention, diagnostics, and treatment; however, scholars have noted concerns with widening health disparities. Nurses work across the health system and can address health disparities from a clinical, research, education, policy, and leadership perspective. To do this, a comprehensive understanding of existing genomics-informed strategies is required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;Published (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods studies, systematic and literature reviews and text and opinion papers) and unpublished (gray) literature that focuses on genomics-informed nursing strategies to address health disparities over the last 10 years were included. No limitations were placed on language.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search was undertaken on May 25, 2023, across 5 databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). Gray literature was searched through websites, including the International Society of Nurses in Genetics and the Global Genomics Nursing Alliance. Abstracts, titles, and full texts were screened by 2 or more independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a data extraction tool. The coded data were analyzed by 2 or more independent reviewers using conventional content analysis and the summarized results are presented using descriptive statistics and evidence tables.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In total, we screened 818 records and 31 were included in the review. The majority of papers were published in either 2019 (n=5, 16%), 2020 (n=5, 16%), or 2021 (n=5, 16%). Most papers came from the United States (n=25, 81%) followed by the Netherlands (n=3, 10%), United Kingdom (n=1, 3%), Tanzania (n=1, 3%) and written from a global perspective (n=1, 3%). Nearly half the papers discussed cancer-related conditions (n=14, 45%) and most of the others did not specify a disease or condition (n=12, 30%). In terms of population, nurse clinicians were mentioned the most frequently (n=16, 52%) followed by nurse researchers, scholars, or scientists (n=8, 26%). The patient population varied, with African American patients or communities (n=7, 23%) and racial or ethnic minorities (n=6, 19%) discussed most frequently. The majority of equity issues focused on inequitable access to genetic and genomics health services amongst ethnic and racial groups (n=14, 45%), individuals with lower educational attainment or health literacy (n=6, 19%), individuals with lower socioeconomic status (n=3, 10%), migrants (n=","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554251/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Defining the exit meta-analysis.","authors":"Jazeel Abdulmajeed, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Tawanda Chivese, Chang Xu, Lukman Thalib, Suhail A R Doi","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent decades, clinical research has seen significant advancements, both in the generation and synthesis of evidence through meta-analyses. Despite these methodological advancements, there is a growing concern about the accumulation of repetitive and redundant literature, potentially contributing to research waste. This highlights the necessity for a mechanism to determine when a meta-analysis has conclusively addressed a research question, signaling no further need for additional studies-a concept we term an \"exit\" meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We introduced a convergence index, the Doi-Abdulmajeed Trial Stability (DAts) index, and a convergence plot to determine the exit status of a meta-analysis. The performance of DAts was examined through simulation and applied to two real-world meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DAts index and convergence plot demonstrate highly effective discriminative ability across varying study scenarios. This represents the first attempt to define an exit meta-analysis using a quantitative measurement of stability (as opposed to sufficiency) and its corresponding plot. The application to real-world scenarios further validated the utility of DAts and the convergence plot in identifying a conclusive (exit) meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new development of DAts and the convergence plot provide a promising tool for investigating the conclusiveness of meta-analyses. By identifying an exit status for meta-analysis, the scientific community may be equipped to make better-informed decisions on the continuation of research on a specific topic, thereby preventing research waste and focusing efforts on areas with unresolved questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tools, techniques, methods, and processes for the detection and mitigation of fraudulent or erroneous data in evidence synthesis: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Timothy Hugh Barker, Grace McKenzie McBride, Amanda Ross-White, Danielle Pollock, Cindy Stern, Sabira Hasanoff, Raju Kanukula, Mafalda Dias, Anna Scott, Edoardo Aromataris, Ashley Whitehorn, Jennifer Stone, Larissa Shamseer, Patrick Palmieri, Miloslav Klugar, Zachary Munn","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to identify, catalogue, and characterize previously reported tools, techniques, methods, and processes that have been recommended or used by evidence synthesizers to detect fraudulent or erroneous data and mitigate its impact.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Decision-making for policy and practice should always be underpinned by the best available evidence-typically peer-reviewed scientific literature. Evidence synthesis literature should be collated and organized using the appropriate evidence synthesis methodology, best exemplified by the role systematic reviews play in evidence-based health care. However, with the rise of \"predatory journals,\" fraudulent or erroneous data may be invading this literature, which may negatively affect evidence syntheses that use this data. This, in turn, may compromise decision-making processes.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include peer-reviewed articles, commentaries, books, and editorials that describe at least 1 tool, technique, method, or process with the explicit purpose of identifying or mitigating the impact of fraudulent or erroneous data for any evidence synthesis, in any topic area. Manuals, handbooks, and guidance from major organizations, universities, and libraries will also be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases and relevant organizational websites will be searched for eligible studies. Title and abstract, and subsequently full-text screening will be conducted in duplicate using Covidence. Data from identified full texts will be extracted using a pre-determined checklist, while the findings will be summarized descriptively and presented in tables.</p><p><strong>This scoping review protocol was registered in open science framework: </strong>https://osf.io/u8yrn.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level in hospital: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Kayley Perfetto, Laura Pozzobon, Kim Sears, Jane O'Hara, Amanda Ross-White, Lenora Duhn","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to understand the experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level from the perspective of care partners, patients, and health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Care partner engagement is a strategy for promoting patient safety in hospitals at the direct care level (ie, at the point where patient care is delivered). When present, care partners can increase safety by watching, listening, and taking action to protect admitted patients. To improve care partner presence policies and safety engagement strategies within hospitals, a comprehensive understanding of the current qualitative evidence about the breadth of experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety is required.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative studies that consider the experiences of care partners, adult patients, and health care professionals. The engagement of care partners in patient safety within pediatric hospital settings will not be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A preliminary literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and a full search strategy was developed for MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (all via Ovid), as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis. The JBI approach to study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, data synthesis, and assessment of confidence will be followed. Two reviewers will test the screening criteria and data extraction protocol.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023476286.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion in JBI qualitative systematic reviews: a methodological scoping review.","authors":"Catrin Evans, Zeinab M Hassanein, Manpreet Bains, Clare Bennett, Merete Bjerrum, Alison Edgley, Deborah Edwards, Kylie Porritt, Susan Salmond","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00025","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this methodological scoping review was to investigate ways in which qualitative review teams are addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the process of conducting and reporting qualitative systematic reviews that use JBI guidelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;To promote health equity, there is a need for evidence synthesis processes and practices to develop approaches that incorporate EDI. Some guidance is available to guide equity-focused review methods and reporting, but this is primarily oriented to quantitative systematic reviews. There is currently limited knowledge about how review teams are addressing EDI within qualitative evidence syntheses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;This review included English-language qualitative systematic reviews, published in 2022, that used all the steps outlined in JBI guidance for qualitative reviews.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A 1-year sample of published reviews was identified from a search undertaken on March 17, 2023, of 2 health care databases: MEDLINE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). Data extraction followed a framework approach, using an adapted preexisting equity template. This included attention to i) the reporting of a range of characteristics associated with EDI, ii) search approaches, and iii) analytical approaches (including reflexivity, intersectionality, and knowledge user engagement). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative summary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Forty-three reviews met the inclusion criteria. The majority of reviews (n=30) framed their questions and aims in a generic/universal (rather than EDI-focused) way. Six reviews justified their population focus in terms of an EDI-related issue. Only one review included a knowledge user. The sociodemographic and other key characteristics of the samples in underpinning studies were poorly reported, making it hard to discern EDI-related issues or to undertake EDI-related analyses. Thirteen of the reviews included non-English-language evidence sources, and 31 reviews included gray literature sources. Ten reviews demonstrated an element of intersectional or otherwise critical approaches within their analyses of categories and synthesized findings (whereby issues of power and/or representation were explicitly considered). Only 8 reviews included discussions of review team composition and reflexivity within the review process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This EDI-focused methodological enquiry has highlighted some limitations within current qualitative evidence synthesis practice. Without closer attention to EDI, there is a danger that systematic reviews may simply serve to amplify, rather than illuminate, existing gaps, silences, and inequitable knowledge claims based on dominant representations. This review sets out a range of suggestions to help qualitative evidence synthesis teams to more systematically embed EDI within t","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Erratum to: Oral hygiene care and the management of oral symptoms in patients with cancer in palliative care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.","authors":"","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00382","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00382","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"22 9","pages":"1936"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}