JBI evidence synthesis最新文献

{"title":"Political economy analysis of health: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Vineetha Karuveettil, Chandrashekar Janakiram, Denny John, Manu Mathur, Balagopal Varma, Heidi Green","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00204","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to identify and map the literature on concepts, definitions, frameworks, outcomes, and applications of political economic analysis of health.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The political economy of health approach seeks to understand how political and economic domains interact and shape individual and population health outcomes. A political economic analysis can provide insights into health problems and inequalities; however, there needs to be more clarity on how the political economy framework is defined and the methods adopted for conducting political economy analysis concerning health.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies focusing on the political economy analysis addressing specific health problems will be included. The study population is not limited to any sociodemographic characteristics, and there will be no restrictions on language or the source of evidence (primary studies or secondary data studies). Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies will included, but narrative and systematic reviews will be excluded, as will conference abstracts and editorials. Studies involving sector- or country-level analysis will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest, DynaMed, and gray literature via Google Scholar and OAIster. Two reviewers will perform study screening and data extraction using a customized data extraction form. The concepts, definitions, frameworks, outcomes, and applications of the political economy of health will be summarized and discussed. The health problems addressed using political economy analysis will be enumerated. Stakeholder engagement will guide all steps of the study. Results will be presented in tabular and graphical formats accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4qaxr/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1906-1913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140923273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Stress interventions for immigrant parents in the United States: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Brian K Lo, In Young Park, Adam Williams","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00205","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00205","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will map stress interventions designed for and implemented among immigrant parents in the United States (US) according to intervention characteristics, participant characteristics, and reported outcomes and measurement tools.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In addition to parenting stressors shared with their non-immigrant counterparts, immigrant parents also face immigration stressors. Although stress interventions can effectively manage, reduce, or prevent stress among non-immigrant populations, we know little about stress interventions designed for immigrant parents in the US. This study will be the first to explore stress interventions implemented among immigrant parents in the US.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This scoping review will include published, peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies that evaluate stress interventions designed specifically for US immigrant parents with at least 1 child under the age of 18 years. Reported interventions must include stress as a primary or secondary outcome or be labeled as a stress intervention. Stress interventions are broadly defined, with no restrictions on the type of stress targeted (eg, job, general, parenting) or the intervention's nature (ie, prevention vs. management/reduction vs. treatment).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search will be conducted in ProQuest's APA PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES, CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), ERIC (ProQuest), Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), International Bibliography of Social Sciences (ProQuest), and the Cochrane Library. Only English-language publications will be eligible, with no date restrictions. Retrieved titles and abstracts will be screened by at least 2 independent reviewers in duplicate. Data will be extracted using a self-developed data extraction tool. Findings will be presented in tabular or diagrammatic format, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/ec39j.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1926-1935"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140923276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Experiences of school-age children living with food allergies: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Noriko Nishida, Yuki Maeda, Shingo Ueki","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00428","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to synthesize the experiences of primary school-age children living with food allergies.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of food allergies has increased in recent years. Primary school-age children with food allergies experience various psychological and social effects, including depressive symptoms, bullying, psychological distress, abnormal eating behaviors, and a diminished quality of life. However, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews focusing on the experiences of children with food allergies.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Qualitative studies including children aged 6 to 12 years living with food allergies will be considered for inclusion. The phenomena of interest are the experiences of primary school-age children living with food allergies. The context of this review encompasses daily life in the community, including school, home, and visits to hospitals or treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). The sources of gray literature will be MedNar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, ClinicalTrials.gov, and UMIN-CTR. After screening the titles and abstracts of identified citations, potentially relevant studies will be retrieved in full. The review will be conducted following the JBI methodology for qualitative evidence. The JBI process of meta-aggregation will be used to identify categories and synthesize findings. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be independently performed by 2 reviewers. The synthesized findings will be graded according to the ConQual approach to establish confidence in the findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022359854.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1866-1874"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of self-management interventions for improving glycemic control and health-related quality of life among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Naomi Carter, Gamze Nalbant, Prit Chahal, Kaushik Chattopadhyay","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00273","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00273","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this review was to assess and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness and safety of self-management interventions for improving glycemic control and health-related quality of life among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in sub-Saharan Africa.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;There has been a rapid increase in the prevalence of T2DM in sub-Saharan Africa. Lifestyle-related risk factors require self-management strategies, and these must be tailored to the context. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating T2DM self-management interventions in sub-Saharan Africa have been conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;This systematic review included RCTs assessing the effectiveness and safety of self-management interventions among adults with T2DM in sub-Saharan Africa, where the self-management intervention matched at least 1 category of the Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) for long-term conditions taxonomy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The following databases were searched from inception until January 14, 2023: MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Directory of Open Access Journals, EThOS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest). Global Health (EBSCOhost) was searched from inception until June 8, 2021. OpenGrey was searched from inception until its archive date of December 1, 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Data synthesis was conducted narratively, followed by meta-analysis where feasible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for assessing the certainty of evidence was applied.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;From 2699 records identified, 18 RCTs were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Interventions included broad self-management education programs, peer support, exercise interventions with education, nutrition education, educational text messaging, and blood glucose self-monitoring support. Only 4 studies received a \"yes\" response for more than half of the criteria in the standardized JBI critical appraisal tool for RCTs. Compared to the control, self-management interventions did not significantly reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 3 months (302 participants, mean difference [MD] -6.0 mmol/mol, 95% CI -17.5, 5.4; very low certainty on GRADE assessment) or 12 months (1504 participants, MD -3.7 mmol/mol, 95% CI -8.2, 0.7; moderate certainty on GRADE assessment). HbA1c was significantly reduced at 6 months (671 participants, MD -8.1 mmol/mol, 95% CI -10.7, -5.4; low certainty on GRADE assessment). Four studies assessed health-related quality of life, but only 1 demonstrated ","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1715-1788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382828/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effectiveness of dose-intensified salvage regimens versus standard-dose chemotherapy for progression-free survival in early progressed follicular lymphoma before autologous stem cell transplantation: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Felipe Pereira Mesquita, Kelli Borges Dos Santos, Juliana Akie Takahashi, Marina Guimarães Dutra Giffoni Dos Santos, Glauber Felizardo Alvim, Abrahão Elias Hallack Neto","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00231","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will evaluate the effectiveness of dose-intensified versus standard-dose salvage regimens on progression-free survival in early progressed follicular lymphoma before high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the substantial advances in the management of follicular lymphoma, approximately 20% of patients experience progression of the disease within 2 years of induction therapy. These patients have worse outcomes, and autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to improve outcomes in this context. Little is known about the optimal salvage regimen.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies must include patients ≥18 years old with early progressed follicular lymphoma who were submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation in subsequent remission. Clinical trials and observational studies will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy will be carried out in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Periódicos CAPES), Scopus, Web of Science, LiLACS, and the Cochrane Library. No date or language restrictions will be imposed. The recommended JBI approach to critical appraisal, study selection, data extraction, and data synthesis will be used. Studies should score at least 50% in accordance with the critical appraisal tool. Data will be pooled whenever possible using the random effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the standard χ 2 and I2 tests. A funnel plot will be generated to assess publication bias if there are 10 or more studies included in the meta-analysis. The GRADE approach will be used to rate certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022373345.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1850-1856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140899880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Capability as a concept in advanced practice nursing and education: a scoping review.","authors":"Martha M Whitfield, Paulina Bleah, Jovina Concepcion Bachynski, Danielle Macdonald, Tracy Klein, Amanda Ross-White, Mike Mimirinis, Rosemary Wilson","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00201","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00201","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this review was to map the literature about the concept of capability in advanced practice nursing education and practice to achieve greater clarity on the concept and its application.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Advanced practice nursing roles make up a growing segment of the global nursing workforce. Capability has been proposed as an overarching description of the attributes of advanced practice nursing roles within complex workplace environments. Capability includes knowing how to learn, and the ability to creatively integrate prior knowledge, skills, judgment, and experience in both new and familiar situations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;This review looked at the literature about capability applied to advanced practice nursing in any setting globally. We were guided by the International Council of Nurses' definition of advanced practice nursing, which includes nurses with both graduate education and an expanded scope of practice. Drawing from an initial review of the literature, we used a working definition of capability, which was a combination of knowledge, skills, experience, and competencies that enables advanced practice nurses to provide appropriate care for patients in both known and unfamiliar clinical settings. We included literature about individual capability as a concept in any setting related to advanced practice nursing and education.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We searched 18 electronic databases and included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods study design methodologies, reviews, and reports. The gray literature search included policy and practice documents from the World Health Organization, the International Council of Nurses, and websites of 48 nursing and health organizations. Two reviewers independently completed title and abstract screening prior to full-text review and data extraction. Conflicts were resolved via discussion or with a third reviewer. Extraction was completed by 2 reviewers using a piloted data extraction tool. Articles published in English from 1975 to the present were included. Sources in languages other than English were not included in the review due to the difficulties in accurately translating the concept of capability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Thirty-five sources were included in the review with publication dates from 2000 to 2023. Most sources originated from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Sources included frameworks and clinical guidelines, peer-reviewed articles, and gray literature. Capability was discussed in a range of settings, including specialized clinical roles. Applications of capability in educational settings included the use of capability frameworks to guide nurse practitioner education, nursing practice doctorates, and postgraduate nurse practitioner training. Definitions of capability, where provided, were relatively consistent. Capability was proposed as a distinguis","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1789-1849"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"\"Doing it, that's something else\": a glimpse into self-management after lung transplantation.","authors":"Anne Rebafka, Clare Bennett, Deborah Edwards","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00284","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"22 9","pages":"1654-1655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Quality indicators to monitor the quality and safety of care for older people: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Timothy J H Lathlean, Maria C Inacio, Johanna Westbrook, Len Gray, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Peter Hibbert, Tracy Comans, Maria Crotty, Steve Wesselingh, Janet K Sluggett, Stephanie Ward, Nasir Wabe, Gillian E Caughey","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00212","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00212","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to identify quality indicators used to monitor the quality and safety of care provided to older people (≥ 65 years old) in 8 care settings: primary care; hospital/acute care; aged care (including residential aged care and home or community care); palliative care; rehabilitation care; care transitions; dementia care; and care in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a need for high-quality, holistic, person-centered care for older people. Older people receive care across multiple care settings, and population-level monitoring of quality and safety of care across settings represents a significant challenge.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>National and international quality indicators used to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of care at the population level for older individuals in the 8 key care settings will be considered for inclusion. English-language quantitative and mixed method studies published from 2012 will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic (MEDLINE, Embase) and gray (government websites, clinical guidelines, Google) literature searches will be conducted. A standardized data extraction tool will be used to describe the identified quality indicators and associated tools. Quality indicators will be categorized by key domains (ie, pain, function, consumer experience, service delivery); quality indicator type (structure, process, outcome); and the Institute of Medicine's 6 dimensions of care quality (eg, efficiency, effectiveness, appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability/person-centered, safety). The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/8czun.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1857-1865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Wheeled mobility use outcomes: a systematic review protocol of measurement properties.","authors":"Kiera Mendoza, Madison Loeser, Béatrice Ouellet, Krista L Best, Paula W Rushton, Lisa K Kenyon, Rachel J Hinrichs, Tony Chase","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-22-00427","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-22-00427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous tools have been developed to measure constructs related to wheelchair use. Currently, no toolkit comprehensively details assessments of wheeled mobility device use based on the quality of their measurement properties. The current review aims to systematically identify high-quality assessment tools that measure different aspects of wheeled mobility use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives are two-fold: i) to synthesize outcome measures that assess use of wheeled mobility devices, and ii) to evaluate measurement properties of the assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The populations of interest are manual wheelchair users, power wheelchair users, and scooter users of any age, diagnosis, or setting. Instruments of any type will be included.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of measurement properties will guide this review. A search strategy will be developed to search the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), PsycTests (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The article selection process, data extraction, and quality appraisal will be performed by 2 independent reviewers, with a third reviewer being consulted to achieve consensus. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed through the Consensus Standards for the Selection of Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias tool and the COSMIN Checklist. The quality of the pooled evidence and individual measurement properties will be graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the COSMIN Criteria for Good Measurement Properties recommendations. Measurement properties of each instrument will be described, with the goal of developing a toolkit that identifies appropriate assessment tools for wheeled mobility use outcomes.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD4202276169.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1898-1905"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Anne Rebafka, Clare Bennett, Catherine Dunn, Dominic Roche, Clare Hawker, Deborah Edwards","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00070","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00070","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this review was to identify lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Lung transplantation is an established treatment to improve the survival of patients with end-stage lung diseases and has been performed on more than 40,000 patients worldwide. The current focus of care for lung transplant recipients is long-term management. Patients need to adapt and adhere to complex self-management tasks to prevent complications and to enable them to keep the transplanted graft as long as possible. However, to date, there are no qualitative systematic reviews that identify lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;This review included studies of adults over 18 years of age who had received a lung transplant and were able to perform their self-management tasks independently. All studies that investigated lung transplant recipients' experiences of and attitudes towards self-management in any setting were eligible for inclusion. All types of studies that focused on qualitative data, including, but not limited to, phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research, were considered for inclusion. Mixed methods studies were included only when qualitative data could be extracted separately, and if they reported results relating to the phenomenon of interest. Studies published in English or German were considered for inclusion in this review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The search strategy aimed to find published studies using the databases Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). The search for unpublished studies included ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database, EThOS, and OpenGrey. Databases were searched from inception to March 2022. Methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI checklist for qualitative research. A standardized data extraction tool from JBI was used by 2 reviewers for data collection. Meta-aggregation was undertaken to synthesize the data, and the final synthesis of the findings was reached through discussion. Results were graded according to ConQual.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Ten studies with a sample size from 8 to 73 participants from North America and Central/Northern Europe were included in the review. The critical appraisal scores of the included studies ranged from 3 to 9 out of 10. A total of 137 findings were extracted and aggregated to form 19 categories and the following 4 aggregated syntheses: i) Changes in routines, beliefs, and sense of responsibility are essential for better adaptation and self-management after lung transplantation; ii) Life after transplantation is characterized by both positive and negative feelings and experiences; iii) Better ad","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1656-1714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140959872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}