执照前健康教育计划实验室环境临床技能评估:范围审查方案。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Karen Eileen Furlong, Jaime Riley, Alexis McGill, Richelle Witherspoon, Patricia Morris, Rose McCloskey, Renee Gordon, Lisa Keeping-Burke
{"title":"执照前健康教育计划实验室环境临床技能评估:范围审查方案。","authors":"Karen Eileen Furlong, Jaime Riley, Alexis McGill, Richelle Witherspoon, Patricia Morris, Rose McCloskey, Renee Gordon, Lisa Keeping-Burke","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map the available literature on the assessment of clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prelicensure health programs are facing growing challenges in delivering learning experiences that sufficiently prepare students for safe practice as clinical settings contend with workforce shortages, rising workload demands, and increasingly complex patient populations. One safety component is the assessment of clinical skills prior to entering practice and caring for patients. Laboratory experiences generally include opportunities for hands-on practice and demonstration of a new clinical skill, including skills such as medication administration or infection prevention and control measures. This scoping review is necessary as laboratory assessments play a crucial role in providing insights into students' readiness to perform relevant clinical skills prior to caring for patients in practice settings.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will consider qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies on approaches and strategies used by faculty, staff, and/or students when assessing clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs. Assessment of postlicensure health care professionals' clinical skills will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Embase.com), ERIC (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest), and Google (with advanced search strategies). Two independent reviewers will screen citations for inclusion as well as conducting data extraction and analysis. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Data will be presented in tables and charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ5BU.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of clinical skills in laboratory settings in prelicensure health education programs: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Eileen Furlong, Jaime Riley, Alexis McGill, Richelle Witherspoon, Patricia Morris, Rose McCloskey, Renee Gordon, Lisa Keeping-Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map the available literature on the assessment of clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prelicensure health programs are facing growing challenges in delivering learning experiences that sufficiently prepare students for safe practice as clinical settings contend with workforce shortages, rising workload demands, and increasingly complex patient populations. One safety component is the assessment of clinical skills prior to entering practice and caring for patients. Laboratory experiences generally include opportunities for hands-on practice and demonstration of a new clinical skill, including skills such as medication administration or infection prevention and control measures. This scoping review is necessary as laboratory assessments play a crucial role in providing insights into students' readiness to perform relevant clinical skills prior to caring for patients in practice settings.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will consider qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies on approaches and strategies used by faculty, staff, and/or students when assessing clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs. Assessment of postlicensure health care professionals' clinical skills will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Embase.com), ERIC (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest), and Google (with advanced search strategies). Two independent reviewers will screen citations for inclusion as well as conducting data extraction and analysis. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Data will be presented in tables and charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ5BU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这一范围审查的目的是绘制现有的文献评估临床技能在实验室设置的健康教育执照前计划。导读:随着临床环境面临劳动力短缺、工作量需求增加和患者群体日益复杂的问题,在提供充分为学生做好安全实践准备的学习经验方面,执照前健康计划正面临越来越大的挑战。一个安全组成部分是在进入实践和照顾病人之前对临床技能进行评估。实验室经验通常包括动手实践和展示新的临床技能的机会,包括药物管理或感染预防和控制措施等技能。这种范围审查是必要的,因为实验室评估在提供学生在实践环境中照顾患者之前是否准备好执行相关临床技能方面发挥着至关重要的作用。资格标准:本综述将考虑教师、职员和/或学生在评估健康教育资格预审项目实验室环境中的临床技能时使用的方法和策略的定性、定量和混合方法研究。对获得执照后的卫生保健专业人员临床技能的评估将被排除在外。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法进行范围综述。要搜索的数据库将包括CINAHL全文(EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Embase.com), ERIC (EBSCOhost), ProQuest学位论文和论文(ProQuest)和谷歌(具有高级搜索策略)。两名独立审稿人将对引文进行筛选,并进行数据提取和分析。第三位审稿人将解决任何分歧。数据将以表格和图表形式提出,并附有叙述性摘要。审核注册:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ5BU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of clinical skills in laboratory settings in prelicensure health education programs: a scoping review protocol.

Objective: This scoping review aims to map the available literature on the assessment of clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs.

Introduction: Prelicensure health programs are facing growing challenges in delivering learning experiences that sufficiently prepare students for safe practice as clinical settings contend with workforce shortages, rising workload demands, and increasingly complex patient populations. One safety component is the assessment of clinical skills prior to entering practice and caring for patients. Laboratory experiences generally include opportunities for hands-on practice and demonstration of a new clinical skill, including skills such as medication administration or infection prevention and control measures. This scoping review is necessary as laboratory assessments play a crucial role in providing insights into students' readiness to perform relevant clinical skills prior to caring for patients in practice settings.

Eligibility criteria: This review will consider qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies on approaches and strategies used by faculty, staff, and/or students when assessing clinical skills in laboratory settings in health education prelicensure programs. Assessment of postlicensure health care professionals' clinical skills will be excluded.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Embase.com), ERIC (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest), and Google (with advanced search strategies). Two independent reviewers will screen citations for inclusion as well as conducting data extraction and analysis. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Data will be presented in tables and charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.

Review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ5BU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信