Investigating multilevel language interventions targeting spoken production in post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review protocol.

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Grace Aryee, Jade Cartwright, Denis Visentin, Janet Webster, Anne Whitworth
{"title":"Investigating multilevel language interventions targeting spoken production in post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Grace Aryee, Jade Cartwright, Denis Visentin, Janet Webster, Anne Whitworth","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will identify multilevel language interventions that target spoken language production in aphasia following stroke and describe their characteristics, the theoretical predictions of the approaches, and what tools are used to measure outcomes.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multilevel aphasia interventions target more than one linguistic level in a sequential and/or simultaneous way. Recent research has shown that treating multiple levels of language processing in the same intervention can broaden treatment effectiveness and provide greater evidence of therapy gains transferring to untreated language skills and impacting broader participation and quality of life than focusing on language levels in isolation. Currently, there is no synthesis or analysis of multilevel aphasia interventions in the literature that might help understand the components that may contribute to these potential benefits. Conducting a scoping review will allow us to systematically explore the nature of these multilevel interventions, their proposed outcomes, and highlight directions for clinical practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will consider aphasia intervention studies that aim to improve spoken production through involving more than one linguistic level in the intervention. Studies will include people with post-stroke aphasia irrespective of aphasia type, severity, or time post-onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus will be searched for published articles. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for relevance against the inclusion criteria. Data will be presented in tables, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/4y7me.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review will identify multilevel language interventions that target spoken language production in aphasia following stroke and describe their characteristics, the theoretical predictions of the approaches, and what tools are used to measure outcomes.

Introduction: Multilevel aphasia interventions target more than one linguistic level in a sequential and/or simultaneous way. Recent research has shown that treating multiple levels of language processing in the same intervention can broaden treatment effectiveness and provide greater evidence of therapy gains transferring to untreated language skills and impacting broader participation and quality of life than focusing on language levels in isolation. Currently, there is no synthesis or analysis of multilevel aphasia interventions in the literature that might help understand the components that may contribute to these potential benefits. Conducting a scoping review will allow us to systematically explore the nature of these multilevel interventions, their proposed outcomes, and highlight directions for clinical practice and future research.

Eligibility criteria: This review will consider aphasia intervention studies that aim to improve spoken production through involving more than one linguistic level in the intervention. Studies will include people with post-stroke aphasia irrespective of aphasia type, severity, or time post-onset.

Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus will be searched for published articles. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for relevance against the inclusion criteria. Data will be presented in tables, accompanied by a narrative summary.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/4y7me.

研究针对卒中后失语症的言语生产的多层次语言干预:范围审查协议。
目的:本综述将确定针对中风后失语症的口语产生的多层次语言干预措施,并描述其特征,方法的理论预测,以及用于测量结果的工具。介绍:多层次失语症干预以顺序和/或同时的方式针对多个语言水平。最近的研究表明,与孤立地关注语言水平相比,在同一干预措施中治疗多个语言处理水平可以扩大治疗效果,并提供更多证据表明,治疗成果转移到未经治疗的语言技能上,并影响更广泛的参与和生活质量。目前,文献中还没有对多级失语干预的综合或分析,这可能有助于理解可能导致这些潜在益处的成分。进行范围审查将使我们能够系统地探索这些多层次干预措施的性质,其提出的结果,并强调临床实践和未来研究的方向。入选标准:本综述将考虑旨在通过在干预中涉及多个语言水平来提高口语产生的失语症干预研究。研究将包括中风后失语症患者,不论失语症类型、严重程度或发病时间。方法:本综述将按照JBI范围综述方法学进行。将检索CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO和Scopus。两名审稿人将根据纳入标准独立筛选文章的相关性。数据将以表格形式提出,并附有叙述性摘要。评审注册:OSF https://osf.io/4y7me。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信