Daniel Libertz, Kamal Belmihoub, Constantin Schreiber, Lisa Blankenship
{"title":"Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses","authors":"Daniel Libertz, Kamal Belmihoub, Constantin Schreiber, Lisa Blankenship","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102904","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102904","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly all students have had some kind of experience with modalities beyond traditional, on-site teaching. We wanted to study how first-year writing students experienced different modalities (i.e., on-site, hybrid, and online) to learn more about how best to support students and faculty in the future. This paper presents results of a mixed-methods study investigating differences in first-year writing student levels of confusion, satisfaction with social interaction, and preferences for modality in learning about writing. We found significant differences (with mostly small effects and some medium and large effects) in lower levels of confusion and higher satisfaction with social interaction in on-site classes relative to hybrid and online classes. We also found that students preferred a modality for a writing class for different and sophisticated reasons. On the basis of these results, we recommend more support for teaching in all modalities, more investigation of strengths/weaknesses of synchronous and asynchronous approaches, and more support offered to students before and during their writing classes for how best to learn <em>how to learn</em> in a given modality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102904"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142745260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chin-Hsi Lin , Keyi Zhou , Lanqing Li , Lanfang Sun
{"title":"Integrating generative AI into digital multimodal composition: A study of multicultural second-language classrooms","authors":"Chin-Hsi Lin , Keyi Zhou , Lanqing Li , Lanfang Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102895","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102895","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the integration of generative AI tools into digital multimodal composition (DMC) within a multicultural context, examining their impact on students’ motivation, writing processes, and outcomes. Eleven culturally diverse students from two high schools in Hong Kong participated in the study. The study developed and employed a novel pedagogical framework, IDEA (Interpret, Design, Evaluate, and Articulate), to seamlessly incorporate generative AI into DMC practices. Data-collection methods included analysis of generative AI tool-usage history, classroom video observations, surveys, and interviews. The findings reveal that students leveraged generative AI’s capabilities across five key areas: content generation, feedback and revision, multilingual support, critical thinking, and visual representation. The integration of AI tools followed distinct stages in the composition process, resulting in enhancements to the vocabulary, grammar, and structural elements of students’ work. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the intersection of generative AI, education, and multimodal literacy, with a particular emphasis on human-AI collaboration in multicultural settings. It also offers valuable insights for educators seeking to enhance students’ DMC skills through the thoughtful integration of generative AI tools, potentially increasing engagement, motivation, and creative expression among learners from diverse cultural backgrounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102895"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142745259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Purposeful remixing with generative AI: Constructing designer voice in multimodal composing","authors":"Xiao Tan , Wei Xu , Chaoran Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102893","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102893","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In multimodal writing, students can mobilize both linguistic and non-linguistic resources to express their real or imagined identities. But at the same time, when students are limited to choosing from available online resources, their voices might be compromised due to the incompatibility between their authorial intentions and the materials available to them. This study, therefore, investigates whether the use of generative AI tools could help student authors construct a more consistent voice in multimodal writing. In this study, we have designed a photo essay assignment where students recount a story in the form of photo essays and prompt AI image-generating tools to create photos for their storytelling. Drawing on interview data, written reflections, written annotations, and multimodal products from seven focal participants, we have identified two remixing practices–<em>layering</em> and <em>blending</em>–through which students attempted to establish a coherent and unique voice in writing. The study sheds light on the intentional and discursive nature of multimodal writing with AI as afforded by the technological flexibility, while also highlighting the practical and ethical challenges that could be attributed to students’ insufficient prompt and multimodal literacy and the innate limitations of AI systems. This study provides important implications for incorporating AI tools in designing multimodal writing tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142745258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Student use of generative AI as a composing process supplement: Concerns for intellectual property and academic honesty","authors":"Emma Kostopolus","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102894","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102894","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article discusses the nuanced challenges of using Generative Artificial Intelligence in multimodal compositions while maintaining an ethical adherence to ideas of academic honesty and intellectual property. Through examining hypothetical scenarios, we can see that multimodality complicates the concept of “fair use” in academic contexts, since image or audio generation via AI functions differently than text generated by a Large Language Model. In thinking through the case studies, the article presents an argument for how educators can still use Generative AI in their multimodal composition assignments, through teaching students to us it as a process supplement and to always be critically aware of their citational responsibilities. This understanding of Generative AI use is placed in conversation with our understanding of intellectual property law as relates to both the classroom and broader digital composing environments, to better prepare students to create texts in their future careers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142745408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A rhetorical consideration of the {XE “embedded”} index","authors":"J.A.T. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102887","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102887","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article, in the area of digital rhetoric, argues that the apparatus of the index is an authored text that bears all of the qualities of creative work. Its primary and distinguishing quality, moreover, is a hylomorphic one that bridges the temporal and material divide by taking the accidence in a text and naming it in substance. This dual nature is especially apparent in indexes that are produced by software, such as MS Word, that require the tagging of a main text to create what is called an “embedded index”; indexes of this sort exist both inside a main text and outside of it, in the tags and in the index list. Because the index both transforms (accidence to idea) and translates (from the main text to index list), the index has rhetorical force, interpreting a text for its readers. It does so as much by its content as by its formal qualities: syntactic, alphabetic, and columnar. Its persuasiveness in tandem with its intervention in the reading process, moreover, has social and political implications since the index can serve as both a means of rebellion and control for those who use and make them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102887"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142655290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Transformative transmediation: Eliciting student self-evaluation of academic writing through the video essay assignment","authors":"Angela Frattarola , Hyejeong Ahn , Ian Dixon","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102891","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102891","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although multimodal assignments have increasingly been incorporated into academic writing curricula, research into their impact on student writing remains limited. This study, conducted at a Singaporean university, required students to transform a written essay draft into a video essay and then revise their draft into a written essay assignment. By comparing students’ initial drafts and their final submissions, and analysing interviews and reflective journals, we identified significant benefits stemming from the transmediation between written and multimodal text. Specifically, we found that 1) transmediation enabled students to self-evaluate their writing as they repeatedly listened to their voiceovers, found concrete visuals to illustrate their ideas, and edited their work to fit the concise video format; 2) students broke with habitual, less useful revision practices as they were freed from the conventional and grammatical concerns of written academic text and narrated their arguments colloquially in their voiceovers; 3) students exhibited an improved awareness of audience and medium; and 4) students were more enthusiastic with the course due to the novelty of the multimodal assignment. These findings suggest that including a video essay assignment during the drafting process can serve as an effective tool in advancing students’ abilities to evaluate their own academic writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102891"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142655289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Letter from the Editor","authors":"Kristine L. Blair","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102890","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102890"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142705637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gavin P. Johnson , Charles Woods , Laura L. Allen , Amber Buck , Ashanka Kumari , James P. Purdy , Jennifer Sano-Franchini , Jason Tham
{"title":"Generosity in computers and writing: Doing what Gail, Halcyon, Johndan, and Bill Taught Us","authors":"Gavin P. Johnson , Charles Woods , Laura L. Allen , Amber Buck , Ashanka Kumari , James P. Purdy , Jennifer Sano-Franchini , Jason Tham","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article offers stories of generosity in computers and writing studies. Inspired by the 2024 Computers and Writing Conference Opening Town Hall, this article considers the foundational role generosity plays in the practices of the field. Specifically, we share our stories of Gail E. Hawisher, Halcyon Lawrence, Johndan Johnson-Eilola, and Bill Hart-Davidson to memorialize how they have contributed to our thinking about generosity in the work that we do and highlight some lessons for generosity that we hope we, as a field, might bear in mind moving forward. Together, we understand a call for generosity as a call for collaboration, inclusivity, curiosity, and giving. We conclude by offering these four tenets explicated from the scholarship, memories, and stories of the lives of Gail, Halcyon, Johndan, and Bill as a way to understand, negotiate, and practice generosity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142535191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Wayfinding” through the AI wilderness: Mapping rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on X (formerly Twitter) to promote critical AI literacies","authors":"Anuj Gupta, Ann Shivers-McNair","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102882","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102882","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we demonstrate how studying the rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on social media can promote critical AI literacies. Prompt writing is the process of writing instructions for generative AI tools like ChatGPT to elicit desired outputs and there has been an upsurge of conversations about it on social media. To study this rhetorical activity, we build on four overlapping traditions of digital writing research in computers and composition that inform how we frame literacies, how we study social media rhetorics, how we engage iteratively and reflexively with methodologies and technologies, and how we blend computational methods with qualitative methods. Drawing on these four traditions, our paper shows our iterative research process through which we gathered and analyzed a dataset of 32,000 posts (formerly known as tweets) from X (formerly Twitter) about prompt writing posted between November 2022 to May 2023. We present five themes about these emerging AI literacy practices: (1) areas of communication impacted by prompt writing, (2) micro-literacy resources shared for prompt writing, (3) market rhetoric shaping prompt writing, (4) rhetorical characteristics of prompts, and (5) definitions of prompt writing. In discussing these themes and our methodologies, we highlight takeaways for digital writing teachers and researchers who are teaching and analyzing critical AI literacies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exploring the interaction among writing fluency, writing processes, and external resource access in second language writing assessment","authors":"Kerry Pusey, Yuko Goto Butler","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102888","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102888","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As part of a larger investigation into the ecology of language tests, this study explores how writing fluency and writing processes are impacted by (dis)allowing access to external writing resources. An analysis was conducted of three international graduate students’ writing practices as they completed two argumentative writing assessment tasks. On one task, participants could access external writing resources (e.g., the internet) and had additional time to complete the task; on the other, access to writing resources was not permitted and a more restricted time limit was enforced. Data were collected from digital screen capture recordings of participants’ compositional practices and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Results indicated that participants took more time and wrote at a slower pace when they had access to external resources; however, additional time did not necessarily lead to a greater volume of writing. Participants also tended to shuttle between writing processes more frequently and execute more micro-level writing actions when they had access to external resources. However, there was substantial individual variation for both fluency and writing processes, highlighting the mediating role of individual differences in L2 writing. Implications for how the construct of academic writing ability is defined in different assessment contexts are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102888"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}