{"title":"A rhetorical consideration of the {XE “embedded”} index","authors":"J.A.T. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102887","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102887","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article, in the area of digital rhetoric, argues that the apparatus of the index is an authored text that bears all of the qualities of creative work. Its primary and distinguishing quality, moreover, is a hylomorphic one that bridges the temporal and material divide by taking the accidence in a text and naming it in substance. This dual nature is especially apparent in indexes that are produced by software, such as MS Word, that require the tagging of a main text to create what is called an “embedded index”; indexes of this sort exist both inside a main text and outside of it, in the tags and in the index list. Because the index both transforms (accidence to idea) and translates (from the main text to index list), the index has rhetorical force, interpreting a text for its readers. It does so as much by its content as by its formal qualities: syntactic, alphabetic, and columnar. Its persuasiveness in tandem with its intervention in the reading process, moreover, has social and political implications since the index can serve as both a means of rebellion and control for those who use and make them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102887"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142655290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Transformative transmediation: Eliciting student self-evaluation of academic writing through the video essay assignment","authors":"Angela Frattarola , Hyejeong Ahn , Ian Dixon","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102891","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102891","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although multimodal assignments have increasingly been incorporated into academic writing curricula, research into their impact on student writing remains limited. This study, conducted at a Singaporean university, required students to transform a written essay draft into a video essay and then revise their draft into a written essay assignment. By comparing students’ initial drafts and their final submissions, and analysing interviews and reflective journals, we identified significant benefits stemming from the transmediation between written and multimodal text. Specifically, we found that 1) transmediation enabled students to self-evaluate their writing as they repeatedly listened to their voiceovers, found concrete visuals to illustrate their ideas, and edited their work to fit the concise video format; 2) students broke with habitual, less useful revision practices as they were freed from the conventional and grammatical concerns of written academic text and narrated their arguments colloquially in their voiceovers; 3) students exhibited an improved awareness of audience and medium; and 4) students were more enthusiastic with the course due to the novelty of the multimodal assignment. These findings suggest that including a video essay assignment during the drafting process can serve as an effective tool in advancing students’ abilities to evaluate their own academic writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102891"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142655289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Letter from the Editor","authors":"Kristine L. Blair","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102890","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102890"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142705637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gavin P. Johnson , Charles Woods , Laura L. Allen , Amber Buck , Ashanka Kumari , James P. Purdy , Jennifer Sano-Franchini , Jason Tham
{"title":"Generosity in computers and writing: Doing what Gail, Halcyon, Johndan, and Bill Taught Us","authors":"Gavin P. Johnson , Charles Woods , Laura L. Allen , Amber Buck , Ashanka Kumari , James P. Purdy , Jennifer Sano-Franchini , Jason Tham","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article offers stories of generosity in computers and writing studies. Inspired by the 2024 Computers and Writing Conference Opening Town Hall, this article considers the foundational role generosity plays in the practices of the field. Specifically, we share our stories of Gail E. Hawisher, Halcyon Lawrence, Johndan Johnson-Eilola, and Bill Hart-Davidson to memorialize how they have contributed to our thinking about generosity in the work that we do and highlight some lessons for generosity that we hope we, as a field, might bear in mind moving forward. Together, we understand a call for generosity as a call for collaboration, inclusivity, curiosity, and giving. We conclude by offering these four tenets explicated from the scholarship, memories, and stories of the lives of Gail, Halcyon, Johndan, and Bill as a way to understand, negotiate, and practice generosity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142535191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Wayfinding” through the AI wilderness: Mapping rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on X (formerly Twitter) to promote critical AI literacies","authors":"Anuj Gupta, Ann Shivers-McNair","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102882","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102882","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we demonstrate how studying the rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on social media can promote critical AI literacies. Prompt writing is the process of writing instructions for generative AI tools like ChatGPT to elicit desired outputs and there has been an upsurge of conversations about it on social media. To study this rhetorical activity, we build on four overlapping traditions of digital writing research in computers and composition that inform how we frame literacies, how we study social media rhetorics, how we engage iteratively and reflexively with methodologies and technologies, and how we blend computational methods with qualitative methods. Drawing on these four traditions, our paper shows our iterative research process through which we gathered and analyzed a dataset of 32,000 posts (formerly known as tweets) from X (formerly Twitter) about prompt writing posted between November 2022 to May 2023. We present five themes about these emerging AI literacy practices: (1) areas of communication impacted by prompt writing, (2) micro-literacy resources shared for prompt writing, (3) market rhetoric shaping prompt writing, (4) rhetorical characteristics of prompts, and (5) definitions of prompt writing. In discussing these themes and our methodologies, we highlight takeaways for digital writing teachers and researchers who are teaching and analyzing critical AI literacies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exploring the interaction among writing fluency, writing processes, and external resource access in second language writing assessment","authors":"Kerry Pusey, Yuko Goto Butler","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102888","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102888","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As part of a larger investigation into the ecology of language tests, this study explores how writing fluency and writing processes are impacted by (dis)allowing access to external writing resources. An analysis was conducted of three international graduate students’ writing practices as they completed two argumentative writing assessment tasks. On one task, participants could access external writing resources (e.g., the internet) and had additional time to complete the task; on the other, access to writing resources was not permitted and a more restricted time limit was enforced. Data were collected from digital screen capture recordings of participants’ compositional practices and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Results indicated that participants took more time and wrote at a slower pace when they had access to external resources; however, additional time did not necessarily lead to a greater volume of writing. Participants also tended to shuttle between writing processes more frequently and execute more micro-level writing actions when they had access to external resources. However, there was substantial individual variation for both fluency and writing processes, highlighting the mediating role of individual differences in L2 writing. Implications for how the construct of academic writing ability is defined in different assessment contexts are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102888"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ecologies, bodies, and OWI teacher preparation: reflecting on a practicum for graduate instructors teaching writing online","authors":"Josephine Lawson, Michael J. Faris","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite increased calls for preparation for online writing instruction (OWI), practica for graduate instructors often assume face-to-face modalities for FYW and practicum courses. This article shares a student’s and teacher's experiences in a 2022 practicum for graduate students teaching writing online for the first time. We argue that an ecological framework for OWI and OWI preparation helps writing programs and teachers attend to how OWI is distributed, emergent, enacted, and embodied. We conclude with suggestions for OWI teacher preparation that emphasizes drawing on teacher preparation scholarship in rhetoric and composition more broadly, attending to novice OWI teachers’ conceptions of literacy, and disabling OWI programs and preparation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102881"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When generative artificial intelligence meets multimodal composition: Rethinking the composition process through an AI-assisted design project","authors":"Jialei Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102883","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102883","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) design technologies, including Adobe Firefly and DALL·E, into the teaching and learning of multimodal composition. Through focus group discussions and case studies, this paper demonstrates the potential of GenAI in reshaping the various stages of the composition process, including invention, designing, and revising. The findings reveal that GenAI technologies have the potential to enhance students’ multimodal composition practices and offer alternative solutions to the wicked problems encountered during the design process. Specifically, GenAI facilitates invention by offering design inspirations and enriches designing by expanding, removing, and editing the student-produced design contents. The students in this study also shared their critical stance on the revision process by modifying and iterating their designs after their uses of GenAI. Through showcasing both the opportunities and challenges of GenAI technologies, this paper contributes to the ongoing scholarly conversations on multimodal composition and pedagogy. Moreover, the paper offers implications for the future research and teaching of GenAI-assisted multimodal composition projects, with the aim of encouraging thoughtful integration of GenAI technologies to foster critical AI literacy among college composition students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Multilingual English second language students’ voice in digital storytelling","authors":"Alexandra Krasova , Oksana Moroz","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102886","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102886","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital storytelling is a productive approach to engaging multilingual students in creative, expressive, and practical tasks to increase their English language development and meaningful thinking. Based on previous research, digital storytelling helps students stay motivated, expand their communication skills, and create narratives with multiple multimodal features (Robin, 2008; Reinders, 2011; Tecnam, 2012). This study expands on previous research by exploring voice in students’ digital storytelling to showcase their identities. A mixed-method study investigated whether the same author's voice could be differentiated among the raters. Therefore, 25 participants were recruited and asked to watch ten pairs of digital stories to evaluate linguistic and multimodal aspects of the stories and either attribute them or not to the same author. The study results indicated that the raters could distinguish between digital stories authored by the same multilingual ESL writer and those crafted by different writers, thus proving that multilingual ESL learners implement voice in their digital stories. The study also revealed that the raters relied on certain multimodal and linguistic features while making their decisions, therefore underlying the importance of developing those multimodal elements in multilingual classrooms. Finally, the study offers numerous activities that can be implemented in multilingual classrooms to develop ESL students’ voices and shape their identities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102886"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simone Sessolo, Marisol Fila, Erin Murray, Mark Mills, Rebecca L. Matz, Holly Derry, Caitlin Hayward
{"title":"The Dissertation ECoach: Supporting graduate students as they transition to dissertation writing","authors":"Simone Sessolo, Marisol Fila, Erin Murray, Mark Mills, Rebecca L. Matz, Holly Derry, Caitlin Hayward","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102884","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102884","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transitioning from coursework to dissertation writing presents unique challenges for graduate students. To support students in this phase of their careers, we created the Dissertation ECoach, a digital tool that provides automated and personalized support and guidance to address individual challenges and promote effective writing habits. By engaging with the Dissertation ECoach, students receive weekly surveys and tailored messages that encourage their writing process. This article discusses the development history, functionality, and methods of the Dissertation ECoach, as well as the results of its implementation at the University of Michigan for the period 2020–2023. Data show that a high percentage of students find the Dissertation ECoach experience helpful, to the point that a subset of students decide to enroll in the experience repeatedly. The article concludes by highlighting the potential of the Dissertation ECoach to be adopted by other universities, offering automated, customized support for graduate students across disciplines. The article also introduces updates that have been implemented in 2023/2024.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102884"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}