Folia Linguistica Historica最新文献_第3页

THE TELEOLOGEN ON LANGUAGE CHANGE 关于语言变化的目的论

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1989-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/FLIH.1989.8.1-2.457

Arleta Adamska-Sałaciak

引用次数: 0

ENGLISH CONTACT CLAUSES REVISITED: A DIACHRONIC APPROACH 重读英语联系从句:历时性方法

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1986-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/flih.1986.7.1.107

X. Dekeyser

{"title":"ENGLISH CONTACT CLAUSES REVISITED: A DIACHRONIC APPROACH","authors":"X. Dekeyser","doi":"10.1515/flih.1986.7.1.107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.1986.7.1.107","url":null,"abstract":"0.1 The existing literature in the field cf contact clauses, i.e. relative clauses without a relative proncun in the stuface structure, is both impressive and comprehensive: it ranges from early sttidies in the last quarter of the 19th Century (see Mustanoja's Tbiblicgraphy, 206 208) to very recent contributions by Erdmann and Nagucka, both in FLH, 1980, and Van der Auwera (FLH, 1984). There are a number of reasons for which I venture to submit yet another paper on this vexed subject-matter. First, the available data have been recently extended considerably: Bourcier (1977) and Bastiaensens (1983) for OE, Chevillet (1981) for ME, and my own data for EME and EMODE. Secondly, the new perspectives opened by Keenan and Comrie's Accessibility Hierarchy, hence AH, and its application to the history of the English relative «lause, e.g. in Romaine, 1980 and 1981 and Dekeyser, 1984. Thirdly, recent cross-linguistic analyses of the relative clause, particularly Der Relativsatz in den indoeuropäischen Sprachen (1981) by Helena Kurzova. All this prompted me to look at the history of contact clauses afresh, and to try and come up with some innovating views on this matter.","PeriodicalId":35126,"journal":{"name":"Folia Linguistica Historica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/flih.1986.7.1.107","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67379257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

DO - SUPPORT IN THE WRITINGS OF LADY MARY WORTLEY MONTAGU: A CHANGE IN PROGRESS 在玛丽·沃特利·蒙塔古夫人的著作中是否有支持:一种进步中的变化

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1985-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/flih.1985.6.1.127

Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade

引用次数: 3

On dialect. By Peter Trudgill, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher, 1983 在方言。彼得·特鲁吉尔著，牛津:巴兹尔·布莱克威尔出版社，1983年

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1984-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/FLIH.1984.5.2.401

Paul A. Johnston

引用次数: 0

MORE ON THE HISTORY OF SUBJECT CONTACT CLAUSES IN ENGLISH 英语主语联系从句的历史

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1984-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.171

J. van der Auwera

{"title":"MORE ON THE HISTORY OF SUBJECT CONTACT CLAUSES IN ENGLISH","authors":"J. van der Auwera","doi":"10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.171","url":null,"abstract":"0. The literature on the history of English subject contact clauses is voluminous (see Mustanoja 1960:206-208; Visser 1963:14-15; Bourcier 1977:78), and it keeps growing, also in Folia Linguistica Historica (see Erdmann 1980; Nagucka 1980; Romaine 1981; Maxwell 1982). In this paper I will briefly comment on the four FLH analyses, and I will offer some alternative ideas. 1.1. Peter Erdmann (1980) has made a corpus-based survey of the contexts of subject contact clauses (henceforth 'SCCs') in present-day Standard British English. Bus conclusion, which is in conformity with earlier scholarship (see esp. Jespersen 1974: 144 149), is that SCCs are very colloquial, and that they are restricted to certain focus constructions. The most typical such constructions start with there isfare (äs in (1) and (2)). Another frequent SCC focus structure employs a cleft sentence (äs in (3) and (4)). (1) There's none can dodge Father Time. (2) There were three of us made the journey. (3) It was a vision brought me here. (4) It must have been the vanity of the old man made me invite you here. The restriction to focus constructions, Erdmann (1980:146) claims, following Krüger (1929: 65 73) and Strang (1970:143), came into effect in the 18th Century. Before that, SCCs had a wider usage — a Situation partially reflected in some varieties of non-standard","PeriodicalId":35126,"journal":{"name":"Folia Linguistica Historica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.171","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67379523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

L’OUVERTURE DE LA VOYELLE (e) ISSUE DE (e) ROMAN ENTRAVE (Ē, Ĭ LATINS) EN ANCIEN FRANÇAIS ESSAI DE DATATION ET DE LOCALISATION 启动元音(e) - (e)小说的结局(ĒĬ拉丁人),在古老的法语障碍定时和定位卫星试验

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1984-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.41

H. van den Bussche

{"title":"L’OUVERTURE DE LA VOYELLE (e) ISSUE DE (e) ROMAN ENTRAVE (Ē, Ĭ LATINS) EN ANCIEN FRANÇAIS ESSAI DE DATATION ET DE LOCALISATION","authors":"H. van den Bussche","doi":"10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.41","url":null,"abstract":"O. Presque tous les traitos de phonetique historique du frangais affirment qu'avant le milieu du XII siecle, Fanden fransai^ possodait, outre les voyelles /e/ et /#/ ou /e:/ issues respectivement de / / roman tonique entrave (ß, AE latins) et de /«/ roman tonique übre (Ä, Ä latins), une troisifeme voyelle palatale non arrondie d'aperture moyenne, ä savoir la voyelle /e/ issue de /e/ roman entravo (E, latins). II semble egalement etabli que des la seconde moitio du XII siecle, cette voyelle tend ä s'ouvrir et se confondre avec la voyelle primitive /s/. Certains auteurs ajoutent que dans les patois de l'Est, cette voyelle est roduite a /a/, /o/ ou /of sana prociser la date de cette reduction. D'aucuns signalent aussi que dans certains patois d'oil, e.a. en Touraine, la voyelle a maintenu sä prononciation fermoe jusqu'ä Tepoque actuelle. Quant aux patois du Nord, on admet en goneral qu'apres la diphtongaison du /e/ primitif en /?e/, la voyelle /e/, en s'ouvrant en /e/, a pu participer occasionnellement ä la diphtongaison en /ief. Nous avons esquisse ailleurs (Van den Bussche et Van Hoecke 1982)Fhistorique","PeriodicalId":35126,"journal":{"name":"Folia Linguistica Historica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/flih.1984.5.1.41","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67379333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

NORDIC I-UMLAUT ONCE MORE: A VARIATIONAL VIEW 北欧i-umlaut再一次:一个变化的观点

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1982-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/FLIH.1982.3.1.59

Hans Basbøll

引用次数: 2

James N. Adams: Social variation and the Latin language 詹姆斯·n·亚当斯:《社会变异与拉丁语》

Folia Linguistica Historica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/flih-2016-0010

B. Bauer

引用次数: 1