Social Psychological Bulletin最新文献

Correction of Paulina Banaszkiewicz (2022). Biological sex and psychological gender differences in the experience and expression of romantic jealousy Paulina Banaszkiewicz（2022 年）的更正。恋爱嫉妒体验和表达中的生物性别和心理性别差异

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.32872/spb.15121

引用次数: 0

Correction of Nathan Vidal et al. (2023). Assessing the reliability of an infrared thermography protocol to assess cold-induced brown adipose tissue activation in French psychology students 对 Nathan Vidal 等人（2023 年）的更正。评估法国心理学学生冷诱导棕色脂肪组织激活的红外热成像方案的可靠性

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.32872/spb.15037

引用次数: 0

Willingness to use moral reframing: Support comes from perceived effectiveness, opposition comes from integrity concerns 使用道德重构的意愿：支持源于对有效性的认知，反对源于对诚信的担忧

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.32872/spb.13053

Aaron Isiminger, Roger Giner-Sorolla

{"title":"Willingness to use moral reframing: Support comes from perceived effectiveness, opposition comes from integrity concerns","authors":"Aaron Isiminger, Roger Giner-Sorolla","doi":"10.32872/spb.13053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.13053","url":null,"abstract":"Moral reframing is a communication technique that involves persuading an audience to support an issue they typically oppose on ideological grounds by appealing to concepts and values that align with their moral concerns. Overall, previous research has found that moral reframing can encourage attitude change more so than non-reframed messages. One pending question, though, is whether people would or would not use this technique in the first place (e.g., because it requires embracing values that one might not endorse). This online study (N = 249) tested the willingness of US-based liberals to use a message appealing to conservative values (morally reframed), vs. one appealing to liberal values (not morally reframed), to persuade a hypothetical conservative audience to be more pro-environmental. Reasons behind message choice and feelings about both messages were measured. Results showed that most participants chose to use the morally reframed message (73%). This choice was justified by the message’s perceived effectiveness, while rejecting it was justified by the need to feel true to one’s own beliefs and values. However, regardless of actual message choice, participants overall reported more positive and less negative integrity feelings for the message that was not morally reframed.","PeriodicalId":32922,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological Bulletin","volume":"113 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141674210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Feeling bad about feeling good? how avengers and observers evaluate the hedonic pleasure of taking revenge 复仇者和观察者如何评价复仇的享乐主义快感？

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI: 10.32872/spb.12477

Karolina Dyduch-Hazar, Mario Gollwitzer

引用次数: 0

Anticipated and achieved individual mobility amongst Portuguese immigrants in Switzerland: Social identity adjustment and inter-minority relations 瑞士葡萄牙移民预期和实现的个人流动性：社会身份调整与少数民族间关系

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI: 10.32872/spb.9465

Marion Chipeaux, C. Kulich, Vincenzo Iacoviello, E. Politi, F. Lorenzi-Cioldi

{"title":"Anticipated and achieved individual mobility amongst Portuguese immigrants in Switzerland: Social identity adjustment and inter-minority relations","authors":"Marion Chipeaux, C. Kulich, Vincenzo Iacoviello, E. Politi, F. Lorenzi-Cioldi","doi":"10.32872/spb.9465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.9465","url":null,"abstract":"Socially mobile minority members (i.e., those who acquire a higher status membership) adjust their social identities, and eventually show negative attitudes towards minorities, as compared to non-mobile members. We examined whether these changes could be understood as the result of individual mobility achievements, or if they already occur at an earlier stage of the mobility process, when individuals are motivated and thus psychologically anticipate achieving mobility. In two studies, we looked at Portuguese immigrants in Switzerland (Ns = 180 and 241) at three mobility stages, that is, (1) Swiss naturalized Portuguese immigrants (socially mobile), (2) non-naturalized Portuguese who strongly wished to be naturalized (high anticipators), and (3) those who wished it less (low anticipators). First, we hypothesized a progressive assimilation to (distancing from) the Swiss (Portuguese) identity and culture (from the low anticipators to the high anticipators to the mobile). As expected, increasing levels of individual mobility were associated with stronger identification with Swiss identity and adoption of the Swiss culture. Conversely, increasing levels of individual mobility were associated with gradual distancing from the Portuguese culture, but against expectations, not with disidentification from the Portuguese identity. Second, we investigated how individual mobility stages were associated with a progressive deterioration of inter-minority relations. Results showed that increasing levels of individual mobility were not associated with more negative attitudes toward immigration (Study 1) but with less collective action intentions (Study 2). We discuss the consequences of anticipated and achieved individual mobility on asymmetric intergroup relations and support for social change.","PeriodicalId":32922,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological Bulletin","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140227489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The impact of mimicry behavior on guilt 模仿行为对内疚感的影响

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI: 10.32872/spb.12697

Paweł Muniak, Wojciech Kulesza

引用次数: 0

They have a point: Testing strategies to improve receptivity to interracial criticism and promote behavioral change 他们说得有道理：测试提高对种族间批评的接受度和促进行为改变的策略

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI: 10.32872/spb.7089

Kaelyn Ireland, Logan Turner, Grace Bowe, Jessica Bray, Brooke Cassanova, CaSaundra White, Steven Peek, Diana Riser, Katherine R. G. White

{"title":"They have a point: Testing strategies to improve receptivity to interracial criticism and promote behavioral change","authors":"Kaelyn Ireland, Logan Turner, Grace Bowe, Jessica Bray, Brooke Cassanova, CaSaundra White, Steven Peek, Diana Riser, Katherine R. G. White","doi":"10.32872/spb.7089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.7089","url":null,"abstract":"People tend to be more resistant to criticism of their own group when it is given by outgroup members as opposed to ingroup members because they view the criticism as less constructive and legitimate when delivered by an outsider—a phenomenon known as the intergroup sensitivity effect, or ISE. The present study (N = 827) examines the effectiveness of two rhetorical techniques—balanced criticism (delivering criticism of one’s own group in addition to the target group) and buttering up (delivering praise alongside criticism) in reducing the ISE among European Americans, African Americans, and Latino Americans. The impact of criticism on intentions to engage in corrective behavior was also explored. Participants read a fictitious interview excerpt containing criticism of their racial group delivered by a racial ingroup or outgroup member and then rated the critic and their statement on several dimensions. We found buttering up reduces the ISE among European Americans and Latino Americans, but not African Americans, while critiquing one’s own racial group alongside the target group is ineffective in reducing the ISE for the three examined groups. Additionally, we found African Americans were more willing to engage in corrective behavior to address criticism directed toward their racial group than their European American or Latino American counterparts. However, contrary to previous research, the group membership of the critic did not affect participants’ willingness to engage in corrective action. These findings contribute to our understanding of interracial dynamics in the United States and illuminate how to facilitate interracial criticism.","PeriodicalId":32922,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological Bulletin","volume":"46 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139612260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Morality as cooperation, politics as conflict 道德是合作，政治是冲突

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI: 10.32872/spb.10157

Florian van Leeuwen, C. V. van Lissa, Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, Michael Bang Petersen, Oliver Scott Curry

引用次数: 0

Are replications mainstream now? A comparison of support for replications expressed in the policies of social psychology journals in 2015 and 2022 复制现在是主流吗？2015年和2022年社会心理学期刊政策中对复制的支持比较

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI: 10.32872/spb.9695

Ann-Kathrin Torka, J. Mazei, J. Hüffmeier

{"title":"Are replications mainstream now? A comparison of support for replications expressed in the policies of social psychology journals in 2015 and 2022","authors":"Ann-Kathrin Torka, J. Mazei, J. Hüffmeier","doi":"10.32872/spb.9695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.9695","url":null,"abstract":"A decade ago, replications were typically not conducted and appreciated in social psychology, although replications play a central role in ensuring trust in scientific fields. Without systematic replication efforts, it is not clear whether findings are trustworthy. As journals can function as gatekeepers for publications, they can influence whether researchers conduct (and publish) replications. Yet, the scholarly culture in social psychology might have changed over the last decade because numerous highly visible studies did not replicate past findings. In light of these insights and the resulting learning opportunities for the field, we predicted an increase in the expressed support for replications in the policies of social psychology journals from 2015 (i.e., the year the replication problem became widely known) to 2022. We coded whether and how replications were mentioned in the author guidelines on the websites of social psychology journals (N = 51). As expected, replications were welcomed more often in 2022 (25%) than they were in 2015 (12%), but they were not mentioned on the websites of most journals (71% in 2022 vs. 82% in 2015). An exploratory analysis suggested that journals that expressed support for replications on their websites were also more likely to publish articles about replication. Further, exploratory analyses of the journals’ TOP factors indicated similar rates of support for replications as for other rigor and transparency promoting policies. In sum, our findings suggest that appreciation for replication has increased, but is not yet part of mainstream culture in social psychology.","PeriodicalId":32922,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological Bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139263969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Beyond reliability in first impressions research: Considering validity and the need to “Mix it up with folks” 超越第一印象研究的可靠性：考虑有效性和 "与人们打成一片 "的必要性

Social Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI: 10.32872/spb.10211

L. Satchell, Bastian Jaeger, Alex Jones, Beatriz López, Christoph Schild

{"title":"Beyond reliability in first impressions research: Considering validity and the need to “Mix it up with folks”","authors":"L. Satchell, Bastian Jaeger, Alex Jones, Beatriz López, Christoph Schild","doi":"10.32872/spb.10211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.10211","url":null,"abstract":"‘First impressions’ are a popular topic in social psychology. They are researched because the initial judgments of others are consequential in everyday life (such as job interviews, first dates, justice outcomes). In the context of broader concerns about the credibility of psychological science, first impressions research has developed commendable initiatives for improving reliability (open stimulus databases, international collaborations, replication studies and reanalyses). However, these initiatives can impact the validity of studying how people form first impressions. There is a long history of critiquing the usefulness of passive-observer judgments of controlled, reduced, presentations of people—and these concerns are still relevant today. Here, we highlight the praiseworthy practices improving reliability in first impressions research, before moving on to identify persistent methodological concerns in the field. This includes inadequate stimulus sampling and diversity, constrained participant response options, limited consideration of study context, and limitations of atomised presentations of target people. We identify how these methodological limitations impact theory development, how we might be over/underestimating everyday experience, and even misunderstanding social differences in autism and mental health. Finally, we identify opportunities for methodological reform, focusing on codifying instead of controlling interactions, promoting inductive, participant-led, methodologies, and asking for stronger theory development and clarity on ‘can’ vs. ‘do’ research questions. Overall, we praise reforms for improving the reliability of first impressions research, but improvements to making scientific predictions about first impressions require renewed consideration of validity.","PeriodicalId":32922,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological Bulletin","volume":"1209 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139265398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0