{"title":"Ugovor o komisionu – neka otvorena pitanja","authors":"Vladimir Pavić, Miloš Živković","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk21a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk21a","url":null,"abstract":"A particularity of commission agency is that the commission agent acts in its own name, but for the account of the principal. The provisions of the Law on Obligations leave certain practical issues conclusively unresolved, and such issues have been encountered both in doctrinal analysis and in case law. The article analyzes some of the issues that, while being relevant in practice, have not been subject to scrutiny recently, such as the content and reach of the obligation of the commission agent to act in accordance with the instructions of the principal, the principals rights over chattels, and claims acquired by the commission agent or held by it, implications of the provisions of the law regulating the rights of the principal in case of bankruptcy of the commission agent, and the consequences of commission agent’s belated transfer of monies received or even unauthorized use of monies belonging to the principal.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42920310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Doprinos Mihaila Konstantinovića modernizaciji jugoslovenske privrede – stvaranje Spoljnotrgovinske arbitraže","authors":"M. Jovanović","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk07a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk07a","url":null,"abstract":"The Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration in Belgrade is one of the historic landmarks left behind by Mihailo Konstantinović. Professor Konstantinović was one of the main proponents of the establishment of this institution and he served as its first president. In that capacity he was in a position to steer the work of the FTCA so that it gained the trust of the business community as quickly as possible and became a reputable arbitral institution both in Yugoslavia and abroad. Records show that the Belgrade Court of Arbitration soon became a leading arbitral institution worldwide and its influence spread far beyond the Yugoslav market. The article presents and analyzes different methods and instruments that Professor Konstantinović used to develop the FTCA and shows how the successful establishment of this institution brought arbitration in Yugoslavia and Serbia into the modern era.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47726326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Konstantinovićeva koncepcija uređenja zastarelosti: da li su ideje o uticaju vremena u pravu izdržale uticaj vremena na pravo?","authors":"Nina Zupan","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk12a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk12a","url":null,"abstract":"Mihailo Konstantinović was the author of the 1953 Act on Limitation of Claims. The article explores how he improved and surpassed the rules on limitation set forth in the Austrian Civil Code which had previously been directly or indirectly applicable in a large part of the former Yugoslavia. His cornerstone ideas were later also copied with minor changes (partly not well thought through) into the Law on Obligations, ensuring there was no need for a comprehensive reform for decades. Admittedly, modern guidelines on limitation propose somewhat different concepts, focusing increasingly on the balance between the creditor and the debtor and on the simplification of the system. However, these guidelines are based on the modern discourse on human rights in private law and on the negative experience of some European jurisdictions with outdated and untransparent rules on limitation which – as opposed to the former Yugoslavia – remained unchanged for a century or more.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48007642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"O načinu uređenja prekomernog oštećenja u našem pravu i odnosu sa srodnim ustanovama","authors":"Snežana Dabić Nikićević","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk19a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk19a","url":null,"abstract":"Mihailo Konstantinović raised important issues regarding how laesio enormis should be applied and regulated in the future, given the inconsistency in the post-war judicial practice. Konstantinović supported the view that laesio enormis should be governed by an objective principle. However, in the Law on Obligations, the right to annul the contract due to obvious disparity between contract obligations exists only if the aggrieved party was mistaken about the true value of the performance when concluding the contract. In this paper, the author raises the question whether such a shift in the regulation of laesio enormis represents an improvement or serious arguments can be raised against it. Тhe author first analyzes how laesio enormis is regulated in comparative law, and then discusses the pros and cons of regulating this legal institute according to an objective and subjective principle.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48056059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Odgovornost za nedostatke kod ugovora o kupoprodaji stvari s digitalnim elementima","authors":"Saša Nikšić","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk18a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk18a","url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the issue of liability for material defects in relation to things with digital elements. Croatian law was recently amended in this field as a consequence of implementation of the Directive (EU) 2019/771, and this paper compares the provisions of EU law with the Croatian law and the legal systems of some other EU member states. The focus of the paper is liability for material defects of things with digital elements, and consequently, the notion of things with digital elements is analyzed along with provisions on defects of such things, updates of things with digital elements, and defects in contracts for the continuous supply of digital content and digital services.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45971368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Normativno uobličavanje ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju u Skici za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima i u Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije","authors":"Dejan B. Đurđević","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk10a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk10a","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a comparative analysis of the legislative proposals contained in the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts and the Predraft of the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia. The text explains the historical development of the life care contract in Serbian legislation and the circumstances that formed it and placed it into codification devoted to law on inheritance. The author is strongly critical of the proposals in the Predraft because its authors did not take advantage of the opportunity to create new rules that would be adequate in contemporary circumstances, but rather copied the existing rules of the Law on Inheritance, which have long been recognized as deficient in certain aspects. The author concludes that the life care contract deserves a new and more comprehensive legislative regime, which would respond to practical needs and solve existing dilemmas.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49396082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Između ketmana i odbrane univerzitetske profesije: Mihailo Konstantinović u akademskim čistkama četrdesetih godina 20. veka","authors":"D. Popovic","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk06a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk06a","url":null,"abstract":"Under Communist rule in Yugoslavia a university professor could either raise his voice and pay a high price, join the Party or accept the ketman practice. Mihailo Konstantinović tried to find a fourth way: retain the office, not cross to the red side and avoid being perceived as a ketman. Konstantinović was absent at the meeting of the Faculty’s Council in 1946 when Dragoljub Jovanović was expelled. When in 1947 Communist students required removal of professors Milan Vladisavljević and Đorđe Mirković, Konstantinović was one of the professors who defended them, exposed to attacks by his communist colleagues. The Council eventually relinquished the decision to higher authorities and Vladisavljević and Mirković were consequently dismissed. The following year assistant professor Milivoje Marković was targeted but due to the Communist pressure fewer colleagues defended him. Konstantinović did not take a stand on that occasion. His most important goal was to preserve the Faculty.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46190559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Teška poremećenost bračnih odnosa kao brakorazvodni uzrok: kreacija profesora Mihaila Konstantinovića","authors":"Marija Draškić","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk09a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk09a","url":null,"abstract":"The article highlights the severe deterioration of marital relations as laid down for the first time in the Yugoslav Basic Law on Marriage in 1946 thanks to Professor Mihailo Konstantinović. Over time, different interpretations of some controversial issues related to the application of this provision have appeared in legal literature and judicial practice; in the first place, whether the spouse who is responsible for the disruption has the right to initiate divorce proceedings, as well as how the exclusive responsibility for severe deterioration can be determined. On the other hand, the insufficiently precise provision on the consensual request for divorce opened the way for discussions about whether the Basic Law recognized consensual petition, which was resolved by judicial practice by interpreting that the joint petition was recognized and given the significance of divorce on the basis of an agreement between the husband and the wife.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47614269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pravne garancije prava svojine","authors":"Katarina Dolović Bojić","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk11a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk11a","url":null,"abstract":"Out of many civil law topics that Mihailo Konstantinović dealt with, the author analyzes the institute of ownership, i.e., the issue of legal guarantees of ownership. Namely, Konstantinović wrote about the notion of the ownership, pointing out that in different times ownership was defined differently and that property owners throughout history did not always have the same scope of authority. In this way, Konstantinović opened the issue of the limitation of ownership and problematized the idea of its inviolability. This paper, inspired by Konstantinović’s lines on the “ownership issue”, analyzes the concept of legal guarantees of ownership. The paper also offers criteria for distinguishing the term ownership limitation from related terms, considering that precise terminology is the basis of the system that forms the backbone of property law. Thus, the key part of property law could be systematized through three units: ownership, limitations, and deprivation of ownership.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48503226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Uloga Mihaila Konstantinovića u državnom preuređenju Kraljevine Jugoslavije","authors":"Tanasije Marinković","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk05a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk05a","url":null,"abstract":"Mihailo Konstantinović is well known to the Serbian and Yugoslav audience as one of the greatest civil law lawyers of his time. He was active in the state administration immediately before and after the Second World War: first, as a minister in the Cvetković–Maček Government, 1939–1941; then, as a chairman of the 1946 Constitution-Drafting Committee. Prior to the Second World War, he was also legal sciences teacher to Crown Prince Petar Karađorđević II. However, Mihailo Konstantinović was also a politician in the best meaning of that term, a true statesman, more specifically, the chief architect of the 1939 Cvetković-Maček Agreement, which represented an attempt to save the Kingdom of Yugoslavia from breaking up. This article aims to shed light on the role he played in the state redesigning of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and on the complexity of his personality, which was revealed through this role.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44977424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}