Konstantinovićeva koncepcija uređenja zastarelosti: da li su ideje o uticaju vremena u pravu izdržale uticaj vremena na pravo?

IF 0.1
Nina Zupan
{"title":"Konstantinovićeva koncepcija uređenja zastarelosti: da li su ideje o uticaju vremena u pravu izdržale uticaj vremena na pravo?","authors":"Nina Zupan","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk12a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mihailo Konstantinović was the author of the 1953 Act on Limitation of Claims. The article explores how he improved and surpassed the rules on limitation set forth in the Austrian Civil Code which had previously been directly or indirectly applicable in a large part of the former Yugoslavia. His cornerstone ideas were later also copied with minor changes (partly not well thought through) into the Law on Obligations, ensuring there was no need for a comprehensive reform for decades. Admittedly, modern guidelines on limitation propose somewhat different concepts, focusing increasingly on the balance between the creditor and the debtor and on the simplification of the system. However, these guidelines are based on the modern discourse on human rights in private law and on the negative experience of some European jurisdictions with outdated and untransparent rules on limitation which – as opposed to the former Yugoslavia – remained unchanged for a century or more.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk12a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mihailo Konstantinović was the author of the 1953 Act on Limitation of Claims. The article explores how he improved and surpassed the rules on limitation set forth in the Austrian Civil Code which had previously been directly or indirectly applicable in a large part of the former Yugoslavia. His cornerstone ideas were later also copied with minor changes (partly not well thought through) into the Law on Obligations, ensuring there was no need for a comprehensive reform for decades. Admittedly, modern guidelines on limitation propose somewhat different concepts, focusing increasingly on the balance between the creditor and the debtor and on the simplification of the system. However, these guidelines are based on the modern discourse on human rights in private law and on the negative experience of some European jurisdictions with outdated and untransparent rules on limitation which – as opposed to the former Yugoslavia – remained unchanged for a century or more.
Konstantinovićeva koncepcija ureŞenja zastarelosti:你的想法是什么?
米哈伊尔·康斯坦丁诺维奇是1953年《诉讼时效法》的作者。本文探讨他如何改进和超越奥地利民法典中规定的限制规则,这些规则以前直接或间接适用于前南斯拉夫的大部分地区。他的基本思想后来也被复制到《债务法》中,只是做了一些细微的改变(部分是没有经过深思熟虑的),确保了几十年来不需要进行全面的改革。诚然,关于时效的现代准则提出了一些不同的概念,越来越注重债权人和债务人之间的平衡以及制度的简化。然而,这些准则是根据私法中关于人权的现代论述和一些欧洲司法管辖区关于时效的过时和不透明规则的消极经验制定的,与前南斯拉夫相反,这些规则在一个多世纪内没有改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书