发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Back to Hart 回到哈特
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfub_21401a
B. Leiter
{"title":"Back to Hart","authors":"B. Leiter","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfub_21401a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfub_21401a","url":null,"abstract":"The essay addresses two different senses of important “problems” for contemporary legal philosophy. In the first case, the “problem” is having forgotten things we learned from H.L.A. Hart, and, partly as a result, encouraging pointless metaphysical inquiries in other directions that take us very far from questions about the nature of law and legal reasoning. In the second case, the “problem” is to attend more carefully to Hart’s views and his philosophical context to think about the problem of theoretical disagreement, and to understand the way in which later commentators have misunderstood his behaviorist (Rylean) analysis of “accepting a rule from an internal point of view.”","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49408823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Does Law Matter? 法律重要吗？
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21402a
F. Schauer
{"title":"Does Law Matter?","authors":"F. Schauer","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21402a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21402a","url":null,"abstract":"Implicit in almost all of legal philosophy is the belief that law matters. But is that belief sound, and, if it is, then why, when, where, and how does law matter? Thus, exploring the conceptual, normative, and empirical dimensions of the proposition that law matters represents a cluster of questions that, if not the most important questions in legal philosophy, are certainly among the most important.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44248732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Legal Balance Between Liberty and Equality 自由与平等的法律平衡
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21307a
Isabel Trujillo
{"title":"The Legal Balance Between Liberty and Equality","authors":"Isabel Trujillo","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21307a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21307a","url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the specific legal balance between liberty and equality, distinguishing it from political theories and constitutional settings, where they are often considered in opposition. In order to find the specific legal balance between liberty and equality, and after identifying some of their relevant meanings for the purpose, it becomes necessary to focus on the rule of law, and to examine the relationship between liberty and equality in its different versions. Once the core meaning of the rule of law in terms of liberty and equality is enucleated, it is possible to consider extending it to the international field.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43419983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Protagora i Kalikle: politički preobražaj polisa i dva sofistička odjeka u platonovim delima Protagora和Kalikle：警察的政治转型和两件白金部件的精致服装
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21303a
Marko Simendić
{"title":"Protagora i Kalikle: politički preobražaj polisa i dva sofistička odjeka u platonovim delima","authors":"Marko Simendić","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21303a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21303a","url":null,"abstract":"By comparing Protagoras’ and Callicles’ arguments, the author outlines two accounts that respond to the questions raised by the changing social realities of 5th century BC Athens. The two sophists’ views are comprised of several complementary elements: 1) viewing humans as beings driven by pursuit of pleasures and avoidance of pain; 2) distinguishing law from nature; 3) views of morality as grounded in nature; 4) demanding that laws be adjusted to natural standards of justice and good life. A key point of disagreement can be found in Protagoras’ myth, where he distinguishes between natural principles that apply only to humans and those that pertain to the rest of the natural world. This draws an important distinction between Protagoras and Callicles: Protagoras’ democratic man seeking to influence the outcomes of collective political decision-making in an egalitarian community is contrasted by Callicles’ aristocrat who is meant to freely govern over their inferiors.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46339672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neke metodološke dileme u uporednom poreskom pravu 预缴税法的若干方法论困境
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21301a
Dejan B. Popovic, Gordana Ilić-Popov
{"title":"Neke metodološke dileme u uporednom poreskom pravu","authors":"Dejan B. Popovic, Gordana Ilić-Popov","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21301a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21301a","url":null,"abstract":"Since for much of the 20th century the comparative law was developing as the comparative private law, with subsequent inclusion of constitutional, administrative and criminal law, comparisons of national tax systems were until recently marginal. The examination of the methods appropriate for the comparative tax law was especially neglected. Assuming that method in comparative law can be identified by techniques of comparisons, the authors considered dilemma whether the starting point for comparisons is praesumptio similitudinis or presumption of difference. Stemming from diversities of these assumptions, two methodological approaches in the comparative (tax) law have developed – functionalism (based on presumption of similarities) and cultural differences approach, from which critical approach subsequently emerged. Having analysed advantages and disadvantages of both approaches, the authors elaborated the basics of „cultural functionalism“, based on the inclusion of cultural context into the research of the ways how tax laws subject to comparison solve the given problems.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43551609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rule of Law Through The Mirror Glass – Is The New 2020 Enlargement Methodology a Pre-Accession TEU Article 7 Mechanism? 透视法治——2020年新的扩员方法是加入TEU前的第7条机制吗?
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21306a
A. Pejovic
{"title":"Rule of Law Through The Mirror Glass – Is The New 2020 Enlargement Methodology a Pre-Accession TEU Article 7 Mechanism?","authors":"A. Pejovic","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21306a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21306a","url":null,"abstract":"The rule of law in the EU is a very complex concept due to its nature, different understanding and its diverse practical implementation, which has led to rule of law backsliding. In parallel, the rule of law represents a crucial pillar of the conditionality policy of new accession processes. The EU’s recent enlargement methodology introduced more stringent and conditional criteria for progress. This resulted in similarities between TEU Article 7 sanctioning mechanism and the new enlargement methodology that implies elaborate sanctions approach for candidate countries in cases of values’ breaches, backsliding, stagnation and lagging behind. The EU polity has, therefore, taken advantage of the empiric knowledge about the rule of law within its own borders and in the enlargement countries, constantly moving between the thin and the thick concept of the rule of law. The two processes have been feeding into each other, therefore, resulting in a growing convergence.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42807038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pedeset godina ekonomske teorije regulacije 经济调控理论五十年
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21308a
Boris Begović
{"title":"Pedeset godina ekonomske teorije regulacije","authors":"Boris Begović","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21308a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21308a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44361066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Virtual Arbitration Hearings: the New Normal? 虚拟仲裁听证会：新常态？
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21302a
Vladimir Pavić, Milica Đorđević
{"title":"Virtual Arbitration Hearings: the New Normal?","authors":"Vladimir Pavić, Milica Đorđević","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21302a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21302a","url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the notion and legal framework for virtual hearings in international arbitration. The authors first examine the existing laws in different jurisdictions and how they tackle the issue both when it comes to litigation and when it comes to arbitration, followed by analyses of various institutional arbitration rules, including recent changes thereof and pertinent case law on the matter. They further examine the general idea of a virtual setting for the hearing against legal and technical objections frequently encountered in practice. In particular, the interplay of technical capabilities and legal standards such as “due process” and the “right to present one’s case” is assessed. Finally, the authors identify possible pathways to replacing the classical in-person hearing with the virtual one and the key legal and practical considerations to be assessed before deciding to proceed with it.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43641082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kriptovalute u islamskom finansijskom sistemu kroz prizmu šerijatskog prava 通过对谢里夫法的承认实现伊斯兰金融体系中的密码学
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21204a
Ahmedin Lekpek
{"title":"Kriptovalute u islamskom finansijskom sistemu kroz prizmu šerijatskog prava","authors":"Ahmedin Lekpek","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21204a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21204a","url":null,"abstract":"The creation of cryptocurrencies marked the beginning of a new era in money evolution. In the cryptocurrency system, governments do not have primacy over monetary flows, but it is in the hands of participants in the cryptocurrency system, which enables the democratization of money. This also raised a number of issues that need to be resolved. Among them, the issues of incorporating cryptocurrencies into monetary policy, accounting, and tax treatment of cryptocurrencies, as well as preventing potential abuses, are especially prominent. On the other hand, Shariah experts deal with cryptocurrencies from the aspect of their Shariah compliance, and on that issue they are divided. This paper analyzes the treatment of money in Islamic teaching and practice, the concept of cryptocurrencies, and the challenges of their practical application, as well as the arguments presented by Shariah experts in support of their positions on the Shariah (non)compliance of cryptocurrencies.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48012942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Inconsistent Adjudication – A Violation of the Right to Fair Trial Under the European Convention on Human Rights 不一致的裁决-违反了《欧洲人权公约》规定的公平审判权
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI: 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21201a
D. Popović
{"title":"Inconsistent Adjudication – A Violation of the Right to Fair Trial Under the European Convention on Human Rights","authors":"D. Popović","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_21201a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21201a","url":null,"abstract":"The ECtHR does not review decisions of national courts of the States Parties to the European Convention. However, it has developed a pattern in its case law to find a violation of the Convention on the grounds that the fair hearing lacked if there was a case law inconsistency at the level of national jurisdiction. The ECtHR case law was settled in a Grand Chamber case against Turkey in 2011. To find a violation under Article 6 of the Convention the ECtHR requires two tests. Firstly, it must establish the existence of a profound and long-standing inconsistency in the domestic case law, and secondly, the ECtHR raises the issue of a mechanism aimed at removing the inconsistency. If the mechanism does not exist, or if it applied ineffectively, the ECtHR finds a violation of human rights. The author suggests the ECtHR should revisit its jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70598011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信