Philosophical anthropology最新文献_第7页

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2021-7-1-168-184

M. Stepanyants

引用次数: 0

The Process of Historical Development of the Image of the Future 未来意象的历史发展过程

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-57-72

M. Shagiakhmetov

{"title":"The Process of Historical Development of the Image of the Future","authors":"M. Shagiakhmetov","doi":"10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-57-72","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-57-72","url":null,"abstract":"The author, using a systematic approach, forms a picture of the process of historical development as the process of formation of the system \"man and nature\", the interaction of which is mediated by the system \"public consciousness — public practice\". The cycle of formation of the system \"man and nature\" goes through four stages: from unity with the nature of primitive man through the stages of contradictions: from dependence on nature and domination over it to conscious unity with nature. The onset of each stage of this process is associated with the achievement of a new quality of the individual's system, with the dominance of the picture of the unity of the world in the public consciousness, with the strengthening of the interaction of subjective and objective. The completion of the formation of the system \"man and nature\" and the transition to the stage of unity is associated with the formation and dissemination of the worldview of unity — a systemic worldview. In this picture of the developing world, as the basis of a systemic worldview, the logic of the development of the individual's system, social consciousness and social practice has a non-linear character of the formation of opposite hierarchies with the subsequent transition to dialectical unity in full accordance with the dialectical logic identified by G.W.F. Hegel: thesis — antithesis — synthesis. This is exactly how the development of Russian society takes place, in which the new quality of the individual's system is associated with the development of social consciousness: idealism — materialism — a systemic worldview, and social practice: capitalism — socialism — a social state with a market economy.","PeriodicalId":319029,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical anthropology","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116621306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Utilitarianism 功利主义

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2019-5-2-192-215

A. Prokofyev

引用次数: 4

The Problem of the Sacred in the Context of the History of Philosophical Thought 哲学思想史语境中的神圣问题

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2021-7-2-142-149

N. Storozhenko

引用次数: 0

Games of the Unconscious (through the Pages of Translations by V.V. Starovoitov) 《无意识的游戏》(V.V. Starovoitov译)

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-167-182

E. Spirova

引用次数: 0

Anthropic body of national legal tradition and communicative practices 民族法律传统与交际实践的人类学主体

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2019-5-1-45-61

T. Selina, A. Shtanko

引用次数: 0

The Philosophical Anthropology of Martin Buber 马丁·布伯的哲学人类学

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2021-7-2-6-33

P. Gurevich

{"title":"The Philosophical Anthropology of Martin Buber","authors":"P. Gurevich","doi":"10.21146/2414-3715-2021-7-2-6-33","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2021-7-2-6-33","url":null,"abstract":"Martin (Mordechai) Buber was born in Vienna in 1878. He lived in Germany until 1933, then emigrated to Switzerland, and later to Palestine. After the Second World War, the philosopher condemned Arab-Jewish hostility and inhumane actions towards Palestinian Arabs. Buber died in 1965 in Jerusalem. The creative legacy of the philosopher is extremely popular in many countries. As a thinker, Buber combined many diverse interests and aspirations. He was a non-trivial sage-philosopher, a brilliant translator of the Tanakh, a researcher of Hasidism, an outstanding educator and preacher, poet and writer. Buber's views are close to dialectical theology and existentialism. The central idea of Buber's philosophy is being as a dialogue between God and man, man and the world. Developing the concept of religious existentialism, the thinker significantly enriched philosophical anthropology. The insight expressed by him, rooted in the biblical tradition, is simple and majestic: a person's life is in dialogue with other people who are like him. This dialogue is creative and saving when it is carried out through the medium of God, his precepts about morality and love. It is in this dialogue that the vitality of God himself is revealed. Thus, Buber responded with all his creativity to the philosophical ideas of the XX century, to the ideas of \"the death of God\" and \"the death of Man\".","PeriodicalId":319029,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical anthropology","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131555010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Russian Studies of Leo Tolstoy: What Does He Achieve with His Sincerity? 托尔斯泰俄国研究:他的真诚成就了什么?

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-114-131

P. Simush

引用次数: 0

Vladimir Starovoitov – translator, psychoanalyst, scientist 弗拉基米尔·斯塔洛沃伊托夫-翻译，精神分析学家，科学家

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-162-166

Alexander Kantor

引用次数: 0

The Philosophy of Transhumanism as a Revenge of the Ego-cogito 超人类主义哲学:自我我思的报复

Philosophical anthropology Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-132-150

M. Philatova

{"title":"The Philosophy of Transhumanism as a Revenge of the Ego-cogito","authors":"M. Philatova","doi":"10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-132-150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-132-150","url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article contrasts the objection to transhumanism, which proceeds from the fact of success technoscience, with the objection, that takes the very fact of technoscience as a problem. Transhumanism itself gives rise to the problematization of science. It is the top of its development, and at the same time it fits into a single line of continuity of the forms of transformation of human nature known in history, as another, new link of it, following Christianity in this serie. The identification of this kind of \"religious\" roots of transhumanism brings back the relevance of the problem of the connection between science and Christianity and provides additional resources for reviewing this problem today. The author of the article shows the connection between the problem of the mathematization (transformation) of nature, known even to the Eleatics, the new possibilities opened for it by Christianity, and the new European tradition of the I-cogito. The Cogito presented itself as a human nature transformed through union with God, as the very unit that Zeno had once sought, but never found. But while posing as something new to western european philosophy and thus defining its development, the cogito was not what it claimed to be. The transition from Descartes' pseudo-discoveries to Zeno's conclusions was inevitable. It has declared itself as a transition from classical epistemology to non-classical epistemology. In view of the fact that non-classics do not just indicate the failure of the classics, but call into question the very possibility of science, two paths open up: the way back or the way forward. The way back brings us back to the problem of the genesis of science, to a radical revision of its possibility. The way forward is the path of transhumanism as a rehabilitation of the pseudo-unity of the I-cogito in the new, extremely favorable conditions, when postmodernism has already abolished the polarization of the top and the bottom, the upper and the lower, that set the problem of unity.","PeriodicalId":319029,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical anthropology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129097545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0