发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Lawful but Awful 合法但可怕
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0008
J. Farrier
{"title":"Lawful but Awful","authors":"J. Farrier","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"This concluding chapter assesses whether federal courts can stop the systemic dysfunction in the separation of powers by policing every allegedly egregious instance of presidential overreach and/or force members of the House and Senate to revive institutional ambition? This book answers no, while also acknowledging the deep and broad existential crisis that has led hundreds of members to seek relief outside of the chambers' vast arsenal of existing constitutional weapons. The twelve interviews conducted for this book explored the “awful” side of congressional delegation of power and executive expansion, which are more than theoretical constitutional arguments. The human consequences of executive branch unilateralism can be tragic, with ripple effects that last decades. These points were especially prominent among members and attorneys on specific foreign policies that have destabilized governments around the world and inflicted lasting harm to innocent civilians and, some argue, long-term U.S. national security. The “lawful” perspective of these conflicts is not necessarily a defense of these policies, nor a muscular executive branch in general. Rather, federal judges cannot take on the presidency in sustained and meaningful ways without Congress's support for its own prerogatives and powers—regardless of which party is in power and where.","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117264564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Silence Is Consent for the Modern Presidency 沉默是对现代总统的同意
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0006
J. Farrier
{"title":"Silence Is Consent for the Modern Presidency","authors":"J. Farrier","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the breadth of executive power expansion in the twentieth century. It does this by studying private litigation cases that challenged presidential firings by Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt; the landmark “Steel Seizure” case under Harry Truman; financial settlements related to the Iran hostage crisis; the post-9/11 cases of detainee treatment; and the most recent passport case on the U.S. policy toward Israel's capital. In almost all of these private litigation cases, the Supreme Court looked at congressional intention and action to guide their decisions. These precedents help one to understand the most recent legal controversies against President Donald Trump. Wherever federal courts can find Congress's delegation of power, presidents will likely win.","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132209307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frontmatter
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501744464-fm
{"title":"Frontmatter","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501744464-fm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501744464-fm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130225998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
6. So Sue Him 6. 那就告他
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501744464-007
{"title":"6. So Sue Him","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501744464-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501744464-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127568687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2. Suing to Save the War Powers Resolution 2. 起诉以挽救战争权力决议
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501744464-003
{"title":"2. Suing to Save the War Powers Resolution","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501744464-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501744464-003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131107814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
3. Legislative Processes Are Constitutional Questions 3.立法程序是宪法问题
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501744464-004
{"title":"3. Legislative Processes Are Constitutional Questions","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501744464-004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501744464-004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132800104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Index 指数
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.1515/9781501744464-012
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9781501744464-012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501744464-012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117176905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suing to Save the War Powers Resolution 起诉以挽救战争权力决议
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0003
J. Farrier
{"title":"Suing to Save the War Powers Resolution","authors":"J. Farrier","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the consequence of four decades of congressional and judicial restraint that followed the passage of the 1973 War Powers Resolution. The member lawsuits began with four challenges to President Ronald Reagan (on El Salvador, Nicaragua, Grenada, and the Iran–Iraq War), and one each against George H. W. Bush (Persian Gulf War), Bill Clinton (Kosovo), George W. Bush (Iraq), and Barack Obama (Libya). These cases were dismissed for different reasons by the federal courts, citing mootness, ripeness, standing, the political question doctrine, and equitable discretion, usually in some combination, as barriers to adjudication. Upon dismissal, federal courts placed the entire burden to rein in presidential power on supermajorities in Congress, even though prior authorization may not have occurred. This disapproval would ultimately require two-thirds of both chambers to override a presidential veto. In these ways, federal courts normalized the very dynamics the member-plaintiffs were targeting in their suits.","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126688184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
War Is Justiciable, Until It Isn’t 战争是可以审判的，直到它不是
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0002
J. Farrier
{"title":"War Is Justiciable, Until It Isn’t","authors":"J. Farrier","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter demonstrates that courts were once comfortable entering into the fray when they have clear congressional guidelines about war authorization (private lawsuits) and when members of Congress press their claims through political as well as legal channels (Cambodia cases). It also shows that federal courts can have a place in war powers conflicts—and they did up through the mid-twentieth century, but only in individual plaintiff cases. Although no federal court has ever ordered a president to stop a war, there was once more comfort in judicial engagement in war-related constitutional questions, at least from the founding generation through the Civil War and beyond; the Cold War changed all three branches' orientations. Member litigation began during the Vietnam War out of frustration with imbalance of power that took permanent root in the Cold War and then remained in the political culture under new international pressures in the 1990s and after 9/11. The chapter then details the first two member cases surrounding the Vietnam War's expansion.","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124770482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Index 指数
Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501744464-012
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501744464-012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501744464-012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132533664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信