Silence Is Consent for the Modern Presidency

J. Farrier
{"title":"Silence Is Consent for the Modern Presidency","authors":"J. Farrier","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the breadth of executive power expansion in the twentieth century. It does this by studying private litigation cases that challenged presidential firings by Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt; the landmark “Steel Seizure” case under Harry Truman; financial settlements related to the Iran hostage crisis; the post-9/11 cases of detainee treatment; and the most recent passport case on the U.S. policy toward Israel's capital. In almost all of these private litigation cases, the Supreme Court looked at congressional intention and action to guide their decisions. These precedents help one to understand the most recent legal controversies against President Donald Trump. Wherever federal courts can find Congress's delegation of power, presidents will likely win.","PeriodicalId":315952,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702501.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines the breadth of executive power expansion in the twentieth century. It does this by studying private litigation cases that challenged presidential firings by Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt; the landmark “Steel Seizure” case under Harry Truman; financial settlements related to the Iran hostage crisis; the post-9/11 cases of detainee treatment; and the most recent passport case on the U.S. policy toward Israel's capital. In almost all of these private litigation cases, the Supreme Court looked at congressional intention and action to guide their decisions. These precedents help one to understand the most recent legal controversies against President Donald Trump. Wherever federal courts can find Congress's delegation of power, presidents will likely win.
沉默是对现代总统的同意
本章考察了二十世纪行政权力扩张的广度。它通过研究伍德罗·威尔逊(Woodrow Wilson)和富兰克林·罗斯福(Franklin Roosevelt)质疑总统解雇的私人诉讼案件来做到这一点;哈里·杜鲁门任内具有里程碑意义的“钢铁扣押”案;与伊朗人质危机有关的金融结算;9/11事件后被拘留者的待遇;以及最近有关美国对以色列首都政策的护照案件。在几乎所有这些私人诉讼案件中,最高法院都考察了国会的意图和行动,以指导他们的裁决。这些先例有助于人们理解最近针对唐纳德·特朗普总统的法律争议。无论联邦法院在哪里找到国会的授权,总统都有可能获胜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信