{"title":"Emerging circular economy practices, environmental health risks, and the “tailings paradox” in Africa’s artisanal and small-scale mining: Evidence from Ghana","authors":"Francis Arthur-Holmes, Diego A. Vazquez-Brust","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104305","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104305","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the dynamics of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) within the context of circular economy (CE) practices in Africa, with a focus on informal gold mining in Ghana. Utilising a case study approach and thematic analysis of qualitative data collected through 50 interviews and field/participant observations spanning from 2019 to 2023, the research uncovers diverse CE practices within the ASM sector and their impacts on rural communities and the natural environment. Based on our findings, CE practices in ASM include sorting waste rocks, recycling tailings, and reprocessing tailings. Applying the paradox knot framework for our study, the findings reveal a “<em>Tailings paradox</em>”, wherein the recycling of mine waste from ASM operations presents intertwined socio-economic opportunities and environmental and health challenges. We thus developed a <em>Tailings Paradox Framework</em> to explain how the “<em>Tailing paradox”</em> can be addressed through a dialectical process of paradox reduction—made up of a regulative system involving regulations, laws and policies, norms, collaborative governance structures, community-led monitoring, adoption of mercury-free technologies, and hybrid governance models —in a bid to formalise informal CE practices associated with mine tailings from ASM operations. Critical discussions from our framework reveal that interventions aimed at addressing environmental and health impacts may inadvertently limit access to economic and social benefits for the most disadvantaged individuals in rural communities. The findings underscore the importance of integrating CE principles into ASM operations to mitigate environmental degradation and promote sustainable development, while also emphasising the need for paradox-oriented collaborative governance approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104305"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145923622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marie Merlo , Cathal Buckley , Thia Hennessy , James A. O’Mahony
{"title":"Associating climate change mitigation with protein security: The case of Ireland","authors":"Marie Merlo , Cathal Buckley , Thia Hennessy , James A. O’Mahony","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104311","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104311","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Meeting the world’s growing population’s protein demand, while minimising the environmental impact of food production, is one of the greatest challenges of our time. Livestock production systems are facing challenges regarding their environmental impact, while cropping systems are seen as more environmentally friendly protein sources. This dichotomy is observed in environmental policies. While the contribution of protein production to climate change must be reduced, the nutritional impact for a growing world population and the economic impact for farmers must be considered in policy developments. Protein security is defined as the number of individuals having their protein requirements met daily. This paper evaluates the net contribution, i.e., considering human edible inputs and outputs involved in the production process, of animal- and plant-based products, to protein output and security for the Republic of Ireland. The effects of environmental policies on this contribution are also analysed. Milk and arable production contribute more to net protein security than beef or sheep meat production. Overall, the Irish protein sector can meet the protein requirements of ca. 20 million people annually, 35 million people if digestibility is considered. While both Scenarios investigated would lead to a reduction in GHG emissions, a Business-as-Usual Scenario would lead to a decrease in gross margin but to an increase in protein output and security. A Climate Policy Scenario would lead to an increase in net protein output, but net digestible protein output would decrease due to beef protein being substituted for plant-based protein sources with a lower digestibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104311"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145974365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Enabling system-level trust: Polycentric governance for complex, many-scaled environmental problems","authors":"Paul D. Hirsch , Bryan G. Norton","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104302","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104302","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Three forms of trust are contrasted: personal level trust (PLT), aggregated personal trust (APLT) and system-level trust (SLT). PLT and APLT are generally developed through face-to-face and other forms of direct relationships among participants in environmental governance. PLT and APLT, while unquestionably helpful and important in addressing environmental issues and policies, have proved insufficient to generate agreement and action in the face of today’s complex multi-scaled problems. These problems often affect larger populations, many numbers of which have no direct relationships with other stakeholders. Consequently, efforts at environmental governance in these cases often lack the support of appropriate levels of trust. It is shown that SLT cannot be built from either PLT or APLT; it requires delving into characteristics of the negotiating groups, themselves. Such groups are likely to find some success if: (1) they share a sense of place; (2) they acknowledge the importance of complexity in their work, and (3) they are focused on a shared problem or nest of problems. The concept of system-level trust is tested by application to collective actions in protecting common pool resources within multi-scaled systems incorporating polycentric governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104302"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145904000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Socioecological transitions that transcend hegemony: From co-optation to resistance regarding Buen Vivir in Ecuador","authors":"César Carranza-Barona , Unai Villalba-Eguiluz","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104320","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104320","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The article analyses <em>Buen Vivir</em> (BV) in Ecuador as an alternative proposal for socioecological transitions in counterhegemonic terms with respect to development. First, we set out the alternative potential of BV based on four dimensions proposed by Valencia-Hamilton and Ramcilovic-Suominen (2023) and Ramcilovic-Suominen (2023): transcending human/nature dualism; the logics of need satisfaction; autonomy and decentralisation of power; and onto-epistemic diversity. Second, we examine the way the governmentalisation of BV in Ecuador resulted in its co-optation and instrumentalization, thus limiting or neutralising its potential for radical socioecological transition. Finally, we show how the radical transformative capacity of BV is maintained and operates in the concrete experiences of social movements and organisations that have a resistance character. To this end, we present the case of a consumers’ organisation based on the Social and Solidarity Economy: the Sur-Siendo cooperative.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146024236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Whose doctrine, whose priority?: On the troublesome legal interpretation of the Aboriginal right to fish by Canadian courts","authors":"Erika Ruth Gavenus , Rachelle Beveridge , Iris Siwallace Skw'asmana , Terre Satterfield","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104294","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104294","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Few policies are more important to Indigenous Peoples living along the coast of so-called British Columbia than those that govern how and when fishing occurs, and by whom. The Doctrine of Priority underlies these policies, defining the ordered priority for fisheries management as: 1. conservation, 2. the constitutional right to fish held by Indigenous Peoples, and 3. commercial and sport fishing. Indigenous Peoples have, however, expressed frustration with fisheries management decisions that contradict the spirit of the Doctrine by jeopardizing the availability of sufficient fish to support the actualisation of their rights. Through a document analysis of 271 reasons for judgements from 196 legal cases, we trace how the Canadian courts have characterized the rights of Indigenous Peoples recognized and affirmed by Section 35 of the Constitution, including the right to fish. Informed by principles of social justice and Indigenous laws, we analyse five potential characterizations of the right to fish: <em>activity, abundance, allocation, amount,</em> and <em>authority.</em> Based on the reviewed case law, we find that the applicability of the Doctrine of Priority in contexts of uncertain resource abundance and ongoing reconciliation is far from a settled matter and one that is likely to remain unresolved if guidance is only sought from the Canadian courts. Instead, Indigenous Peoples working to ensure access to fish to support their communities are enacting their right to fish in meaningful and diverse ways –innovations key to understandings of the Doctrine of Priority and the pursuit of just fisheries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104294"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145923694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ana Paula de Carvalho Silva , Margarida Ribau Teixeira , Luís Miguel Nunes
{"title":"Transdisciplinarity in water management: A systematic review of concepts, practices, and challenges","authors":"Ana Paula de Carvalho Silva , Margarida Ribau Teixeira , Luís Miguel Nunes","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104317","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104317","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transdisciplinarity has become a central paradigm for addressing complex socio-environmental challenges that transcend disciplinary and institutional boundaries. This article revisits the concept from the perspective of water resources management, questioning whether its increasing application has achieved the depth and transformative potential originally envisioned. A systematic review and bibliometric analysis were conducted to examine how transdisciplinarity has been conceptualized and operationalized across 61 international initiatives covering multiple governance scales and institutional contexts. The findings reveal that, although transdisciplinarity is now widely recognized in scientific and policy agendas, its implementation often remains rhetorical or fragmented. Persistent barriers include limited knowledge co-production, asymmetry between scientific and local expertise, and weak participatory mechanisms. Nonetheless, promising experiences demonstrate that when communities are engaged as co-authors of decisions, water governance becomes more legitimate, adaptive, and sustainable. By integrating empirical evidence with conceptual reflection, this study advances understanding of how ethical and methodological co-production can move transdisciplinarity from a normative paradigm toward an actionable framework for water governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104317"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Integrating more-than-human approaches in urban planning pedagogy: A case study from Europe","authors":"Susa Eräranta , Adrianna Czarnecka , Monika Piotrkowska , Jonne Hytönen","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite decades of sustainability efforts, urban planning often leads to environmental degradation. This paper questions the anthropocentric assumptions in planning education and advocates for integrating nonhuman perspectives through a more-than-human approach. To embrace the intrinsic value and agency of all actors, the paper approaches more-than-human planning education through three stages: recognition, inclusion, and co-flourishing. As traditional planning curricula prioritize human needs, overlooking the interconnectedness of all life, the paper provides already existing examples of more-than-human planning education by reflecting on the experiences of students and course staff on two Master's level studio courses at Warsaw University of Technology (Poland) and Aalto University (Finland) to learn from the potential of more-than-human education. These courses aimed to strengthen planners' roles in sustainability transformations by recognizing the agency and intrinsic value of nonhumans. The findings suggest that the core aim of planning from a more-than-human perspective is in protecting the planet’s life-supporting systems – not only in protecting individual humans, plants, or animals. This requires a shift from individually focused thinking towards more holistic systemic approaches. Based on this, the paper initiates a discussion on the need for a paradigm shift in planning education to embrace more-than-human perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104321"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conditional visibility: Intersectional inequities marginalize local scholarship in conservation science","authors":"Ronald J. Maliao , Béla Tóthmérész","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104328","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104328","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Structural inequities in conservation science, rooted in center-periphery dynamics, funding asymmetries, and systemic gender disparities, marginalize Global South scholarship. This marginalization impedes the integration of Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK), effectively decoupling local scholarship from global conservation discourse. We analyzed 132 peer-reviewed articles on Philippine aquatic ILK and environmental stewardship. We modeled how author affiliation (International/Local), gender (Male/Female), and funding status (Funded/Unfunded) shaped scholarly visibility using scientometric mapping and factorial analysis. Our findings revealed a clear thematic segregation: international scholars focused on the highly visible Applied Conservation cluster (median Citations Per Year [CPY] = 2.06), but Philippine scholars concentrated on the less visible Ethnoecology and Governance cluster (median CPY = 0.80). Globally, our modeling reveals a significant three-way interaction (Analysis of Variance [ANOVA], <em>F</em>(1124) = 12.06, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Pairwise comparison confirmed an intersectional pattern: funded Philippine male scholars achieved statistical parity with international peers, yet funded Philippine female scholars remained significantly marginalized. This demographic hierarchy was absent in the Philippines-only subset (<em>F</em>(3,72) = 0.92, <em>p</em> > 0.05). These findings highlight <em>conditional visibility</em>: the impact of local scholarship is shaped not by merit alone but by intersectional hierarchies of affiliation, funding, and gender. Achieving global knowledge equity demands dismantling these hierarchies to end the erasure of local, and particularly female, scholarship in conservation science.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104328"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146073811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sonia Ferdous Hoque , Rob Hope , Katrina J. Charles , Mohammad Monirul Alam , Md Nurul Osman , Mohammad Saiful Islam Mazomder
{"title":"Driving impacts through science-practitioner partnership: Professionalising water service delivery in rural Bangladesh","authors":"Sonia Ferdous Hoque , Rob Hope , Katrina J. Charles , Mohammad Monirul Alam , Md Nurul Osman , Mohammad Saiful Islam Mazomder","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104316","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104316","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Academic research is under increasing pressure to demonstrate tangible societal, environmental, and economic impact, prompting increased engagement between scientists and practitioners. This paper investigates how such partnerships evolve, how science contributes across different phases of the policy process, and what conditions enable or constrain their effectiveness. It does so through the case of SafePani, a professional rural water service delivery model in Bangladesh. Conceptualised and piloted through UK-based research funding in schools and healthcare facilities, SafePani was later scaled under a six-year, results-based funding contract co-funded by the Government of Bangladesh. The study integrates the multi-level perspective, actor-centred institutionalism, and institutional work to analyse the micro-level activities that actors engaged in to build networks, shape dominant discourses and drive institutional change. Findings show that SafePani’s success stemmed not only from technical innovation but from its strategic adaptability. This included evolving actor configurations from academic-led research to government-led implementation, mobilising financial, intellectual, and political capital, engaging credible boundary actors to build trust, and engaging bureaucratic champions. Crucially, institutional stamina of the government, the model’s low cost and public value, and the funding flexibility enabled actors to overcome institutional inertia. SafePani offers a replicable example of how interdisciplinary science, sustained engagement, and contextual adaptation can drive institutional reform in complex policy environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104316"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145974366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Merlijn van Hulst , Kirsty Holstead , Tamara Metze
{"title":"Conceptualizing transdisciplinarity: How do visuals mean?","authors":"Merlijn van Hulst , Kirsty Holstead , Tamara Metze","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104253","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104253","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transdisciplinary research is commonly understood as a research collaboration between different academic disciplines and actors from different sectors of society to co-produce knowledge needed in addressing real-world problems. In this paper, we understand transdisciplinary research as <em>an epistemological object</em> and study how researchers conceptualize it through visualization. To do this, we analyzed a set of related visuals in their textual context published over the last 20 years. This multi-modal analysis shows that transdisciplinarity in our set has, throughout the years, consisted of three main categories: science, practice, and the transdisciplinary research process. Transdisciplinary research has been visualized as a stable double-joint cyclical narrative starting in the settings of science and practice, after which actors join to collaborate, both depart with the results of collaboration. An assumed principle is continuously and implicitly visualized: the idea and ideal that science and practice are contributing, collaborating, and reaping benefits on the basis of equality. Supported by the literature, we problematize this way visuals obscure imbalances in practice. Finally, we discuss how visuals mean and what other ways of conceptualizing an epistemic object like transdisciplinary are possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104253"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147421217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}