Hayrol Azril Mohamed Shaffril , Walter Leal Filho , Asnarulkhadi Abu Samah , Syafila Kamarudin
{"title":"A systematic literature review on the interconnection between climate change impacts and conflicts","authors":"Hayrol Azril Mohamed Shaffril , Walter Leal Filho , Asnarulkhadi Abu Samah , Syafila Kamarudin","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study attempts to systematically review the available evidence on the impacts of climate change on conflicts. It simultaneously explores how conflict can hinder people from practicing their best adaptation strategies. The systematic literature review was guided by ROSES (RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research) and based on searching processes in Scopus, Science Direct, Dimensions.ai, and Google Scholar databases. The final number of articles for the review is 35. Based on the thematic analysis performed, four main themes were discussed in the review, namely 1) climate change exacerbates internal conflicts; 2) Climate change, military disputes and diplomatic tensions between countries over natural resources; 3) Climate change, migration, and conflict; and 4) Conflicts obstruct the community from practicing the best adaptation strategies toward climate change impacts. Multifaceted conflicts often impede communities from adopting their most effective climate adaptation strategies. Humans' economic habits are disrupted by social disturbance, which limits their capacity and motivation to seek workable ways to mitigate the consequences of climate change. In addition to weakening social ties, the dispute has made it more difficult for community members to access resources and allocate limited funds in the community's best interests, thereby detracting from the adoption of crucial actions to mitigate the consequences of climate change. The capacity of people to organise, plan, and carry out efficient methods to safeguard community interests in the context of climate change can be enhanced by effective communication at the organisational or community level, as well as by the absence of conflict-related community capacity building. Conflict also prevents outside assistance and support that may aid the community's preparation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104169"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001856","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study attempts to systematically review the available evidence on the impacts of climate change on conflicts. It simultaneously explores how conflict can hinder people from practicing their best adaptation strategies. The systematic literature review was guided by ROSES (RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research) and based on searching processes in Scopus, Science Direct, Dimensions.ai, and Google Scholar databases. The final number of articles for the review is 35. Based on the thematic analysis performed, four main themes were discussed in the review, namely 1) climate change exacerbates internal conflicts; 2) Climate change, military disputes and diplomatic tensions between countries over natural resources; 3) Climate change, migration, and conflict; and 4) Conflicts obstruct the community from practicing the best adaptation strategies toward climate change impacts. Multifaceted conflicts often impede communities from adopting their most effective climate adaptation strategies. Humans' economic habits are disrupted by social disturbance, which limits their capacity and motivation to seek workable ways to mitigate the consequences of climate change. In addition to weakening social ties, the dispute has made it more difficult for community members to access resources and allocate limited funds in the community's best interests, thereby detracting from the adoption of crucial actions to mitigate the consequences of climate change. The capacity of people to organise, plan, and carry out efficient methods to safeguard community interests in the context of climate change can be enhanced by effective communication at the organisational or community level, as well as by the absence of conflict-related community capacity building. Conflict also prevents outside assistance and support that may aid the community's preparation.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.