{"title":"The response of macroinvertebrates to inundation in floodplain wetlands: A possible effect of river regulation?","authors":"G. Quinn, T. J. Hillman, R. Cook","doi":"10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<469::AID-RRR598>3.0.CO;2-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<469::AID-RRR598>3.0.CO;2-1","url":null,"abstract":"A large number of permanent and temporary wetlands are associated with the lowland rivers in south-eastern Australia. Regulation of these rivers for irrigated agriculture has probably increased the temporary nature of some wetlands because the reduced frequency of overbank flows causes them to remain dry for longer. The responses of macroinvertebrate assemblages (species composition and abundance) to inundation in permanent and temporary wetlands on the floodplain of the unregulated Ovens River were examined, and these responses were compared with those from permanent and temporary wetlands in the Barmah-Millewa forest of the regulated River Murray. The compositions of macroinvertebrate assemblages in permanent wetlands could not be distinguished from those of temporary wetlands on the Ovens after inundation, although changes in abundance of some taxa (especially chironomids) meant that the assemblages in permanent wetlands differed significantly before and after flooding. In contrast, after inundation, permanent and temporary wetlands in the Barmah-Millewa forest differed significantly and this difference was sustained through time. This different response of macroinvertebrate assemblages on the two floodplains may be an effect of regulation, although other explanations, such as differences between the floodplains in the mechanism of inundation and historical water regimes, or climatid differences between years, may also be important. Further studies should include concurrent sampling on a wider range of regulated floodplains and experiments manipulating water allocations to wetlands, to test specific hypotheses about the effects of water regime on biota.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"351 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122176401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cyclic perturbation of lowland river channels and ecological response","authors":"F. D. Shields, S. Knight, C. M. Cooper","doi":"10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<307::AID-RRR582>3.0.CO;2-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<307::AID-RRR582>3.0.CO;2-2","url":null,"abstract":"Certain lowland streams have experienced prehistorical and historical cycles of aggradation, occlusion, degradation, headward incision, and renewed aggradation. Historical cycles appear to be related to human activities. A case study is presented of the Yalobusha River in Mississippi with emphasis on the effects of blockage and removal on aquatic habitats and fish. The adjacent Skuna River, which was channelized and unblocked, was used in space for time substitution to infer effects of blockage removal on the Yalobusha. Variables describing physical aquatic habitat and fish were sampled from three groups of river reaches: unblocked channelized, channelized and blocked, and naturally sinuous. Fish collections were used to compute six indicators of ecological integrity. At baseflow, mean water depths were an order of magnitude lower in the unblocked channelized stream than for the others. In-channel aquatic habitat volume per unit valley length was 5, 85, and 283 m 3 /m for the channelized, blocked channelized, and natural reaches, respectively. Mean values for all six ecological indicators were lowest for the channelized group. Species richness was greatest for the channelized blocked reach. The ecological indicators displayed gradients in response to the range of observed physical conditions. Management of corridors susceptible to the cycle described above should involve a blend of measures designed to conserve higher quality habitats.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124403284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}