A. Robertson, R. W. Rowling
{"title":"Effects of livestock on riparian zone vegetation in an Australian dryland river","authors":"A. Robertson, R. W. Rowling","doi":"10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<527::AID-RRR602>3.0.CO;2-W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vegetation structure and composition and the mass of components of organic detritus were assessed in paired areas, with and without stock access, at six sites. The study revealed that grazing has altered and continues to alter the structure and function of the riparian landscape in the Murrumbidgee River and its tributaries in southeastern Australia. Seedlings and saplings of the dominant Eucalyptus tree species were up to three orders of magnitude more abundant in areas with no stock access, and the biomass of groundcover plants was an order of magnitude greater in areas with no stock access at all sites. Plant species richness did not differ between areas with and without stock access when the ameliorating effect of canopy tree density was taken into account, but plant community composition differed significantly between areas at all sites. Coarse particulate organic matter and terrestrial fine woody debris were consistently more abundant in areas without stock. In-stream fine and coarse woody debris was more abundant in areas without stock at mainstream sites, but not in tributaries. The percentage of bare soil was greater in areas with stock access at all sites. Differences between areas with and without stock access were generally most pronounced at sites where the riparian zone had been excluded from stock access for more than 50 years. The effects of livestock on vegetation and components of detritus have a significant influence on the function of riparian zones. Efforts to restore river health that focus solely on reducing the impact of regulated flows may be nullified if livestock grazing is not considered as part of river ecosystem management. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"124","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<527::AID-RRR602>3.0.CO;2-W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 124
牲畜对澳大利亚一条旱地河流河岸带植被的影响
对6个样地的植被结构组成和有机碎屑质的质量进行了评价。研究表明,放牧已经并将继续改变澳大利亚东南部Murrumbidgee河及其支流的河岸景观的结构和功能。桉树优势树种的幼苗和树苗在无蓄积物可达的区域要多出3个数量级,地被植物的生物量在无蓄积物可达的区域要多出1个数量级。考虑林冠乔木密度的改善作用时,有和无林冠可利用区植物物种丰富度无显著差异,但各立地的植物群落组成差异显著。粗颗粒有机质和陆源细木屑碎屑在无植被区始终较为丰富。流内细、粗木屑在干流样地无蓄积物区更为丰富,而在支流中则不丰富。在所有站点中,有放养动物可达的地区,裸露土壤的比例都较大。有和没有鱼类进入的地区之间的差异通常在河岸区被排除在鱼类进入之外超过50年的地点最为明显。牲畜对植被和碎屑组分的影响对河岸带的功能有重要影响。如果不把放牧牲畜视为河流生态系统管理的一部分,那么恢复河流健康的努力只注重减少受管制流量的影响,可能会无效。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。