南澳大利亚默里河下游浮游植物种群的平流、生长和营养状况

P. Baker, J. Brookes, M. Burch, H. Maier, G. Ganf
{"title":"南澳大利亚默里河下游浮游植物种群的平流、生长和营养状况","authors":"P. Baker, J. Brookes, M. Burch, H. Maier, G. Ganf","doi":"10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<327::AID-RRR576>3.0.CO;2-Q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the link between river flow, nutrient availability and development of algal blooms, growth rates of the major phytoplankton species were examined in situ in the lower River Murray, South Australia over the 1994/1995 summer. Eight sites were selected over a 54 km reach between Lock 1 and Nildottie and growth rates estimated by monitoring mean cell density in time-aligned parcels of water as they travelled downstream. Discharge at Lock 1 during the period of study (3000–5000 ML day−1) typified summer entitlement flows to South Australia. A large, shallow floodplain lake (lagoon), with an hydraulic connection to the river, supported a large population of cyanobacteria in summer, but inputs to the main channel did not substantially affect the abundance and composition of river phytoplankton. Mean net growth rates of Anabaena circinalis and A. flos-aquae f. flos-aquae were 0.132 and 0.176 day−1, respectively, although individual rates varied from positive to negative. In contrast, the mean growth rate of the filamentous diatom Aulacoseira granulata was −0.15 day−1, reflecting a decrease in population size with advection downstream. Mean cell densities of the three species did not exceed 5000 cells mL−1 throughout the study. Growth bioassays conducted in the laboratory indicated that nitrogen was often the nutrient limiting algal growth, although it was not established whether nitrogen was limiting in situ. A conceptual model is presented, linking these findings with those of other work on the lower River Murray, to summarize the physical and chemical environmental factors governing the abundance of cyanobacteria in this reach of the river. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advection, growth and nutrient status of phytoplankton populations in the lower River Murray, South Australia\",\"authors\":\"P. Baker, J. Brookes, M. Burch, H. Maier, G. Ganf\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<327::AID-RRR576>3.0.CO;2-Q\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To investigate the link between river flow, nutrient availability and development of algal blooms, growth rates of the major phytoplankton species were examined in situ in the lower River Murray, South Australia over the 1994/1995 summer. Eight sites were selected over a 54 km reach between Lock 1 and Nildottie and growth rates estimated by monitoring mean cell density in time-aligned parcels of water as they travelled downstream. Discharge at Lock 1 during the period of study (3000–5000 ML day−1) typified summer entitlement flows to South Australia. A large, shallow floodplain lake (lagoon), with an hydraulic connection to the river, supported a large population of cyanobacteria in summer, but inputs to the main channel did not substantially affect the abundance and composition of river phytoplankton. Mean net growth rates of Anabaena circinalis and A. flos-aquae f. flos-aquae were 0.132 and 0.176 day−1, respectively, although individual rates varied from positive to negative. In contrast, the mean growth rate of the filamentous diatom Aulacoseira granulata was −0.15 day−1, reflecting a decrease in population size with advection downstream. Mean cell densities of the three species did not exceed 5000 cells mL−1 throughout the study. Growth bioassays conducted in the laboratory indicated that nitrogen was often the nutrient limiting algal growth, although it was not established whether nitrogen was limiting in situ. A conceptual model is presented, linking these findings with those of other work on the lower River Murray, to summarize the physical and chemical environmental factors governing the abundance of cyanobacteria in this reach of the river. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulated Rivers-research & Management\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulated Rivers-research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<327::AID-RRR576>3.0.CO;2-Q\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200007/08)16:4<327::AID-RRR576>3.0.CO;2-Q","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

为了调查河流流量、养分供应和藻华发展之间的联系,1994/1995年夏季在南澳大利亚默里河下游实地考察了主要浮游植物种类的生长速度。在1号锁和Nildottie之间的54公里范围内选择了8个地点,并通过监测沿时间排列的水包中的平均细胞密度来估计生长速度。在研究期间(3000-5000 ML天−1),锁1的流量代表了夏季权利流向南澳大利亚。一个与河流有水力连接的大而浅的洪泛平原湖(泻湖)在夏季支持了大量的蓝藻种群,但对主河道的投入并没有实质性地影响河流浮游植物的丰度和组成。环状水藻和水藻的平均净生长率分别为0.132和0.176 d - 1,但个体的阳性率有正有负。而丝状硅藻的平均生长率为- 0.15 d - 1,反映了种群规模随着平流的下游而减小。在整个研究过程中,三个物种的平均细胞密度不超过5000个细胞mL−1。在实验室进行的生长生物测定表明,氮通常是限制藻类生长的营养物质,尽管尚不确定氮是否在原位限制藻类生长。提出了一个概念模型,将这些发现与穆雷河下游的其他工作联系起来,总结了控制河流这一河段蓝藻丰度的物理和化学环境因素。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advection, growth and nutrient status of phytoplankton populations in the lower River Murray, South Australia
To investigate the link between river flow, nutrient availability and development of algal blooms, growth rates of the major phytoplankton species were examined in situ in the lower River Murray, South Australia over the 1994/1995 summer. Eight sites were selected over a 54 km reach between Lock 1 and Nildottie and growth rates estimated by monitoring mean cell density in time-aligned parcels of water as they travelled downstream. Discharge at Lock 1 during the period of study (3000–5000 ML day−1) typified summer entitlement flows to South Australia. A large, shallow floodplain lake (lagoon), with an hydraulic connection to the river, supported a large population of cyanobacteria in summer, but inputs to the main channel did not substantially affect the abundance and composition of river phytoplankton. Mean net growth rates of Anabaena circinalis and A. flos-aquae f. flos-aquae were 0.132 and 0.176 day−1, respectively, although individual rates varied from positive to negative. In contrast, the mean growth rate of the filamentous diatom Aulacoseira granulata was −0.15 day−1, reflecting a decrease in population size with advection downstream. Mean cell densities of the three species did not exceed 5000 cells mL−1 throughout the study. Growth bioassays conducted in the laboratory indicated that nitrogen was often the nutrient limiting algal growth, although it was not established whether nitrogen was limiting in situ. A conceptual model is presented, linking these findings with those of other work on the lower River Murray, to summarize the physical and chemical environmental factors governing the abundance of cyanobacteria in this reach of the river. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信