Decision-Washington最新文献_第9页

Cognitive mechanisms underlying subjective value of past and future events: Modeling systematic reversals of temporal value asymmetry. 过去和未来事件主观价值的认知机制:模拟时间价值不对称的系统性逆转。

IF 1.5

Decision-Washington Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI: 10.1037/dec0000181

Peter D. Kvam, Matthew Baldwin, Erin C. Westgate

引用次数: 1

Reconsidering the “bias” in “the correspondence bias”. 对“对应偏差”中“偏差”的再认识。

IF 1.5

Decision-Washington Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI: 10.1037/dec0000180

Drew Walker, Kevin A. Smith, E. Vul

{"title":"Reconsidering the “bias” in “the correspondence bias”.","authors":"Drew Walker, Kevin A. Smith, E. Vul","doi":"10.1037/dec0000180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000180","url":null,"abstract":"We do not directly observe the internal qualities of others so we must infer them from behavior. Although classic attribution theories agree that we consider situational pressures when estimating such internal qualities, one of the best-known results in psychology is that we are prone to a correspondence bias: That we draw inferences from behavior, even when we know that the situation has constrained the action. Dozens of theoretical accounts have sought to explain this result, with the most famous being the proposal that we commit a fundamental attribution error: We are systematically biased to underappreciate the in ﬂ uence of external factors and thus overattribute behavior to disposition. Although there remains disagreement about why we attribute constrained behavior to disposition, most researchers agree that this tendency is in fact an error . We propose that the social judgments made in classic attitude attribution studies have been widely interpreted as reasoning errors only because they have been compared to an inappropriate benchmark, predicated on the assumption of deterministic dispositions and situations. Building from earlier probabilistic accounts, we review classic results that demonstrate that social inferences are consistent with unbiased probabilistic attribution of the in ﬂ uence of situations and dispositions in an uncertain world.","PeriodicalId":29935,"journal":{"name":"Decision-Washington","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41615701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reply to commentaries: Why should we worry about scientific conjunction fallacies? 回复评论:我们为什么要担心科学连接谬误?

IF 1.5

Decision-Washington Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1037/dec0000176

Michel Regenwetter, M. Robinson

引用次数: 0

Behavioral decision research is not a Linda problem: Comment on Regenwetter et al. (2022). 行为决策研究不是Linda的问题：Regenwetter等人的评论（2022）。

IF 1.5

Decision-Washington Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1037/dec0000170

David Kellen

引用次数: 0

Heterogeneous heterogeneity: Comment on Regenwetter et al. (2022). 异质异质性:对Regenwetter等人(2022)的评论。