UrologiePub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02429-w
Carolin Siech, Luis A Kluth, Mareen Konopka, Maximilian Reimann, Henning Plage, Isabel Lichy, Benedikt Gerdes, Jan Kasperek, Clara Humke, Phillip Marks, Margit Fisch, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Felix K H Chun, Timm Schäfer, Christian P Meyer, Julia C Kaulfuss
{"title":"[Sex-specific differences in surgical confidence: results of the Endo Workshop of the German Society of Residents in Urology 2022].","authors":"Carolin Siech, Luis A Kluth, Mareen Konopka, Maximilian Reimann, Henning Plage, Isabel Lichy, Benedikt Gerdes, Jan Kasperek, Clara Humke, Phillip Marks, Margit Fisch, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Felix K H Chun, Timm Schäfer, Christian P Meyer, Julia C Kaulfuss","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02429-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00120-024-02429-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based training is gaining importance in urologic residents training.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This prospective study evaluated the influence of the Endo Workshop of the German Society of Residents in Urology e. V. (GeSRU) on surgical confidence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>GeSRU Endo Workshop 2022 included 1 h simulation-based training sessions on stone removal using ureteroscopy (URS) and transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). Using an online questionnaire, surgical confidence was assessed before and after the workshop. Surgical assessment relied on the global rating scale (GRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 40 residents participated: 25 (62.5%) men and 15 (37.5%) women. In URS assessment, men vs. women achieved an average of 26.6 vs. 26.1/35 points on the GRS (p = 0.7) and completed the task in 8.1 ± 1.9 vs. 9.9 ± 0.4 min (p < 0.001). In TURB assessment, men vs. women achieved an average of 26.0 vs. 27.3/35 points on the GRS (p = 0.3) and required 7.6 ± 1.9 vs. 7.7 ± 2.2 min (p = 0.9), respectively. Among participants who answered the baseline survey and the evaluation (n = 33), 16 (80%) men vs. 3 (23%) women had surgical confidence to perform URS before (p = 0.01), and 19 (95%) men vs. 7 (54%) women after the workshop (p = 0.03). Regarding the performance of TURB, 10 (50%) men vs. 7 (54%) women reported surgical confidence before (p = 0.1), and 15 (75%) men vs. 10 (77%) women after the workshop (p = 1.0). An increase in surgical confidence to perform URS and TURB was reported by 9 (45%) and 10 (50%) men and 9 (69%) and 8 (62%) women, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endourologic simulation-based training increases surgical confidence of both female and male residents. Despite comparable surgical outcomes, women approach URS with lower surgical confidence compared to their male counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"1122-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549232/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
UrologiePub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-13DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02435-y
Julian Heidenreich, Ruben Gößmann, Felix Seelemeyer, David Pfister, Pia Paffenholz, Axel Heidenreich
{"title":"[Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular germ cell cancer in clinical stage IIA/B-renaissance of an established treatment?]","authors":"Julian Heidenreich, Ruben Gößmann, Felix Seelemeyer, David Pfister, Pia Paffenholz, Axel Heidenreich","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02435-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00120-024-02435-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The guideline-recommended treatment of choice for clinical stage IIA/B testicular germ cell tumors is chemotherapy with three cycles of PEB/four cycles of PE or, alternatively, radiation for seminomas. Despite their high curative efficacy, both options are associated with significant long-term toxicities. We evaluated the functional and oncological outcomes of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a therapeutic alternative.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between 2018 and 2022, 76 patients (n = 34 seminomas, n = 42 nonseminomas) underwent primary RPLND for marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B testicular germ cell cancer. All patients underwent nerve-sparing RPLND with a unilateral or bilateral template dissection and had a follow-up ≥ 3 months. None of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. In 24 patients, the serum concentration of miR371a-3p was evaluated preoperatively. Follow-up was performed according to EAU guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age and median follow-up were 30.1 (17-62) years and 29.3 (3-72) months, respectively. Mean operation time, blood loss, and duration of hospitalization were 131 (105-195) min, < 150 ml, and 4.5 (3-9) days, respectively. A Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication was experienced by 8 (10.9%) patients. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 90.8%. A mean number of 19 (7-68) lymph nodes were dissected. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was 1.1 (1-5), and the mean diameter of positive lymph nodes was 2.4 (0.8-4.6) cm. Eleven (14.5%) patients had stage pN0 (3/34 seminomas, 8/42 nonseminomas). In 24/27 patients (88.9%) miR371 was positive, and it was negative in 4/4 with pN0 and 3/3 (100%) with teratoma. An outfield relapse was experienced by 7 patients (9.2%), who then received salvage chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary RPLND for marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B germ cell tumors results in high cure rates without adjuvant chemotherapy and is associated with a low rate of complications if performed in experienced hands. Therefore, primary RPLND should be included in the management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"1129-1136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"[Desire to have children after vasectomy : Vasectomy reversal or assisted reproductive technology?]","authors":"Armin Soave, Sabine Kliesch, Jann-Frederik Cremers","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02454-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00120-024-02454-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The vasectomy is a safe and effective method of contraception for men. Up to 6% of men who underwent vasectomy have a renewed child wish. Microsurgical vasectomy reversal (VR) in men, microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA), or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in men plus assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the female partner as well as the combination of VR and MESA/TESE plus ART represent established therapeutic strategies. Various factors may impact the success of VR, as defined by patency and pregnancy rate following VR, including the female partner's age, the obstructive interval, and the surgical VR technique. There is no difference in the pregnancy and live birth rate following VR or MESA/TESE plus ART. However, following MESA/TESE plus ART, time to pregnancy is shorter compared with VR. Overall, VR is more cost-effective than MESA/TESE plus ART and allows for a lower therapeutic burden, especially in the female partner. In addition, VR combined with TESE plus-if necessary-ART is more cost-effective than MESA/TESE plus ART alone, even in female partners with advanced age. For successful counseling regarding the different therapy options for a renewed child wish after vasectomy, it is important to evaluate the underlying individual situation of the couple.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"1111-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142476381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
UrologiePub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02413-4
C Aydogdu, I Brinkmann, J Casuscelli
{"title":"[Novel systemic treatment options for advanced bladder cancer].","authors":"C Aydogdu, I Brinkmann, J Casuscelli","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02413-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00120-024-02413-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systemic treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder requires complex approaches and is constantly evolving. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy remains the current standard of care for muscle-invasive advanced bladder cancer. For patients ineligible for cisplatin, adjuvant treatment with nivolumab is recommended. Innovative perioperative combinations could transform the treatment landscape in the future. First-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has long been dominated by platinum-based combinations, recently followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitor avelumab as maintenance therapy; however, recent results on the use of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in the first-line setting are expected to fundamentally change the treatment options. In subsequent lines of treatment, the not yet approved erdafitinib, as the first targeted therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma, offers an important alternative and underscores the need for molecular testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"1162-1173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142112792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
UrologiePub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02392-6
Friedrich H Moll, Heiner Fangerau
{"title":"[Early sources of urologic and venereologic sexual medicine from Vienna : Protagonists at the interface of two new medical specialties].","authors":"Friedrich H Moll, Heiner Fangerau","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02392-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00120-024-02392-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Austrian Society for the Promotion of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Health (Österreichische Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Sexualmedizin und der Sexuellen Gesundheit [ÖGFSSG]) was founded in 2014. This foundation looked back upon the increasing efforts to develop this field of academic knowledge since the middle of the 19th century, in which Viennese medicine played an important role. This article highlights key Viennese players who had a particular interest in sexual medicine from a urological perspective around 1900. They worked in the wider area of several disciplines, striving for specialization in the environment of a rapidly growing metropolis with multiple cultural influences. The scholars presented here as a collection of sources contributed to the upswing in sexual medicine through their work by venturing into an area in which no medical or other discipline had previously been able to claim sovereignty of interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"1137-1150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}