[基于视频解剖的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后改善尿失禁的手术技术综述]。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jens Rassweiler, Sara Sander
{"title":"[基于视频解剖的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后改善尿失禁的手术技术综述]。","authors":"Jens Rassweiler, Sara Sander","doi":"10.1007/s00120-025-02627-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has become widely accepted in German-speaking countries, there needs to be an agreement on the most efficient surgical techniques. This should be based on the video-anatomy of the prostate and a summary of the actual literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on video material of different surgical techniques, a systematic literature search in PubMed has been performed focusing on preservation of continence and minimal rates of positive margins. This is based on the anatomy of the male pelvis applying a standard nomenclature. The original 3825 publications could be reduced to 604 articles according to the inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical studies). When expanding the search to encompass individual operation techniques, we identified 27 relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Crucial surgical details include preserving the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, a long urethral stump with protection of the urethral lissosphincter and posteriorly reconstruction of the rectourethralis with the prostatovesical muscle. Fascial preservation for the levator ani muscle results in 1‑year continence between 78.0 and 98.3%, preservation of the puboprostatic collar and detrusor apron between 95.6 and 100%, maximal functional urethral length between 90.5 and 97.5%. Posterior reconstruction leads to a 3-month continence between 92.3 and 96.9%. Preserving the Retzius' space and thus the total anterior sphincter apparatus results in 1‑year continence of 95.8%; however, it is associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (14-42 vs. 10-29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the increase of knowledge and the feasibility to translate this into novel surgical techniques, the continence rates could be significantly improved. This includes approaches to spare anatomical structures of the sphincter apparatus, such as preservation of the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, the urethral lissosphincter, but also reconstructive techniques, such as posterior reconstruction of the vesicoprostatic and rectourethralis muscle. Demanding techniques, such as the Retzius-sparing approach result in higher continence rates, but are also associated with a higher rate of surgical margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Surgical techniques to improve continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy based on video-anatomy-a review].\",\"authors\":\"Jens Rassweiler, Sara Sander\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00120-025-02627-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has become widely accepted in German-speaking countries, there needs to be an agreement on the most efficient surgical techniques. This should be based on the video-anatomy of the prostate and a summary of the actual literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on video material of different surgical techniques, a systematic literature search in PubMed has been performed focusing on preservation of continence and minimal rates of positive margins. This is based on the anatomy of the male pelvis applying a standard nomenclature. The original 3825 publications could be reduced to 604 articles according to the inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical studies). When expanding the search to encompass individual operation techniques, we identified 27 relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Crucial surgical details include preserving the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, a long urethral stump with protection of the urethral lissosphincter and posteriorly reconstruction of the rectourethralis with the prostatovesical muscle. Fascial preservation for the levator ani muscle results in 1‑year continence between 78.0 and 98.3%, preservation of the puboprostatic collar and detrusor apron between 95.6 and 100%, maximal functional urethral length between 90.5 and 97.5%. Posterior reconstruction leads to a 3-month continence between 92.3 and 96.9%. Preserving the Retzius' space and thus the total anterior sphincter apparatus results in 1‑year continence of 95.8%; however, it is associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (14-42 vs. 10-29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the increase of knowledge and the feasibility to translate this into novel surgical techniques, the continence rates could be significantly improved. This includes approaches to spare anatomical structures of the sphincter apparatus, such as preservation of the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, the urethral lissosphincter, but also reconstructive techniques, such as posterior reconstruction of the vesicoprostatic and rectourethralis muscle. Demanding techniques, such as the Retzius-sparing approach result in higher continence rates, but are also associated with a higher rate of surgical margins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02627-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02627-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)在德语国家已被广泛接受,因此需要对最有效的手术技术达成一致。这应该基于前列腺的视频解剖和实际文献的总结。材料和方法:基于不同手术技术的视频资料,在PubMed上进行了系统的文献检索,重点是保留失禁和最小阳性边缘率。这是基于男性骨盆的解剖结构,采用标准的命名法。根据纳入标准(随机对照试验、荟萃分析、系统评价和临床研究),最初的3825篇出版物可以减少到604篇。当将搜索范围扩大到包含单个操作技术时,我们确定了27篇相关文章。结果:关键的手术细节包括保留提肌筋膜、耻骨前列腺领、保护尿道舌括约肌的长尿道残端和前列腺膀胱肌后方重建直肠尿道。筋膜保留提肛肌的1年尿失禁率在78.0 ~ 98.3%之间,耻骨前列腺环和逼尿肌围在95.6 ~ 100%之间,最大功能尿道长度在90.5% ~ 97.5%之间。后路重建导致3个月的尿失禁率在92.3 - 96.9%之间。保留Retzius间隙,从而保留整个前括约肌,1年尿失禁率为95.8%;然而,它与较高的手术切缘阳性率相关(14- 42% vs. 10-29%)。结论:基于知识的增加和将其转化为新的手术技术的可行性,可以显著提高失禁率。这包括保留括约肌器官解剖结构的方法,如保留提肌筋膜、耻骨前列腺领、尿道舌括约肌,也包括重建技术,如膀胱前列腺肌和直尿道肌的后侧重建。要求较高的技术,如Retzius-sparing入路导致较高的尿失禁率,但也与较高的手术切缘率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Surgical techniques to improve continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy based on video-anatomy-a review].

Background: Since robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has become widely accepted in German-speaking countries, there needs to be an agreement on the most efficient surgical techniques. This should be based on the video-anatomy of the prostate and a summary of the actual literature.

Materials and methods: Based on video material of different surgical techniques, a systematic literature search in PubMed has been performed focusing on preservation of continence and minimal rates of positive margins. This is based on the anatomy of the male pelvis applying a standard nomenclature. The original 3825 publications could be reduced to 604 articles according to the inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical studies). When expanding the search to encompass individual operation techniques, we identified 27 relevant articles.

Results: Crucial surgical details include preserving the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, a long urethral stump with protection of the urethral lissosphincter and posteriorly reconstruction of the rectourethralis with the prostatovesical muscle. Fascial preservation for the levator ani muscle results in 1‑year continence between 78.0 and 98.3%, preservation of the puboprostatic collar and detrusor apron between 95.6 and 100%, maximal functional urethral length between 90.5 and 97.5%. Posterior reconstruction leads to a 3-month continence between 92.3 and 96.9%. Preserving the Retzius' space and thus the total anterior sphincter apparatus results in 1‑year continence of 95.8%; however, it is associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (14-42 vs. 10-29%).

Conclusion: Based on the increase of knowledge and the feasibility to translate this into novel surgical techniques, the continence rates could be significantly improved. This includes approaches to spare anatomical structures of the sphincter apparatus, such as preservation of the levator fascia, the puboprostatic collar, the urethral lissosphincter, but also reconstructive techniques, such as posterior reconstruction of the vesicoprostatic and rectourethralis muscle. Demanding techniques, such as the Retzius-sparing approach result in higher continence rates, but are also associated with a higher rate of surgical margins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信