Behavioural Public Policy最新文献_第9页

Whose pay should be cut in economic crises? Consumers prefer firms that prioritize paying employees over CEOs 在经济危机中，谁的工资应该被削减?消费者更喜欢优先支付员工工资而不是首席执行官的公司

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.30

Serena F. Hagerty, Bhavya Mohan, M. Norton

{"title":"Whose pay should be cut in economic crises? Consumers prefer firms that prioritize paying employees over CEOs","authors":"Serena F. Hagerty, Bhavya Mohan, M. Norton","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2021.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.30","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Four experiments examine the impact of a firm deciding to no longer pay salaries for executives versus employees on consumer behavior, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 1 explores the effect of announcing either pay cessations or continued pay for either CEO or employees, and shows that firms’ commitment to maintaining employee pay leads to the most positive consumer reactions. Study 2 examines the effects of simultaneously announcing employee and CEO pay cessations: consumers respond most positively to firms prioritizing employee pay, regardless of their strategy for CEO pay. Moreover, these positive perceptions are mediated by perceptions of financial pain to employees, more than perceptions of CEO-to-worker pay ratio fairness. Study 3, using an incentive-compatible design, shows that firms’ commitment to paying employees their full wages matters more to consumers than cuts to executive pay, even when those executive pay cuts lead to a lower CEO-to-worker pay ratio. Study 4 tests our account in a non-COVID-19 context, and shows that consumers continue to react favorably to firms that maintain employee pay, but when loss is less salient, consumers prioritize cutting CEO pay and lowering the CEO-to-worker pay ratio. We discuss the implications of our results for firms and policymakers during economic crises.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48886448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

BPP volume 5 issue 4 Cover and Back matter BPP第5卷第4期封面和封底

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.28

引用次数: 0

Editorial Introduction: behavioural climate policy 社论导言:行为气候政策

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2020.45

A. Oliver, G. Akerlof, C. Sunstein

引用次数: 0

Reviewers: Behavioural Public Policy 2021 评审者:行为公共政策2021

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-15 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.26

Bence Bagó, Andrew Ivchenko, K. Kensinger, Dario Krpan, Carly D. Robinson

{"title":"Reviewers: Behavioural Public Policy 2021","authors":"Bence Bagó, Andrew Ivchenko, K. Kensinger, Dario Krpan, Carly D. Robinson","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2021.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.26","url":null,"abstract":"Nicolas Ajzenman, Getulio Vargas Foundation, Brazil. Iveta Alexovicova, Maastricht University, Netherlands. Mark Andor, RWI Essen, Germany. Lydia Assouad, Paris School of Economics, France. Bence Bago, Toulouse School of Economics, France. Shankha Basu, University of Leeds, UK. Samuel Berlinski, Inter-American Development Bank, USA. Luc Bovens, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. Jacob Bradt, Harvard University, USA. Philip Cash, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark. Sujoy Chakravarty, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India. Shiri Cohen Kaminitz, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Alexander Coppock, Yale University, USA. Paul Delfabbro, University of Adelaide, Australia. Eugen Dimant, University of Pennsylvania, USA. James Drummond, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, France. John Gastil, Penn State University, USA. Caterina Giannetti, Università di Pisa, Italy. Russell Golman, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. Donald Green, Columbia University, USA. Manuel Grieder, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. Michael Hallsworth, Behavioural Insights Team, USA. Fabian Hattke, University of Hamburg, Germany. Zoelene Hill, Child Trends, USA. Alfred Ho, City University of Hong Kong, China. Tony Hockley, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK. Søren Holm, University of Manchester, UK. Ming Hsu, University of California Berkeley, USA. Behavioural Public Policy (2021), 5: 4, 606–608 © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.26","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"5 1","pages":"606 - 608"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48187531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

BPP volume 5 issue 4 Cover and Front matter BPP第5卷第4期封面和封面问题

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-15 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.27

S. Linden, Adam R. Pearson, L. Boven, G. Akerlof, C. Sunstein

引用次数: 0

Reflecting on reflection: prospect theory, our behaviors, and our environment 反思：前景理论、我们的行为和我们的环境

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.31

A. Oliver

引用次数: 3

If you've earned it, you deserve it: ultimatums, with Lego 如果这是你应得的，那就是:最后通牒，用乐高

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.29

A. Oliver

{"title":"If you've earned it, you deserve it: ultimatums, with Lego","authors":"A. Oliver","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2021.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.29","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The ultimatum and dictator games were developed to help identify the fundamental motivators of human behavior, typically by asking participants to share windfall endowments with other persons. In the ultimatum game, a common observation is that proposers offer, and responders refuse to accept, a much larger share of the endowment than is predicted by rational choice theory. However, in the real world, windfalls are rare: money is usually earned. I report here a small study aimed at testing how participants react to an ultimatum game after they have earned their endowments by either building a Lego model or spending some time sorting out screws by their length. I find that the shares that proposers offer and responders accept are significantly lower than that typically observed with windfall money, an observation that is intensified when the task undertaken to earn the endowment is generally less enjoyable and thus perhaps more effortful (i.e., screw sorting compared to Lego building). I suggest, therefore, that considerations of effort-based desert are often important drivers behind individual decision-making, and that laboratory experiments, if intended to inform public policy design and implementation, ought to mirror the broad characteristics of the realities that people face.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42049533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Effect of Crianza Positiva e-messaging program on adult–child language interactions Crianza positive电子邮件程序对成人-儿童语言互动的影响

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-06 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.25

A. Balsa, F. Lopez Boo, Juanita Bloomfield, Alejandrina Cristia, Alejandro Cid, M. Ferro, Rosario Valdés, M. L. González

{"title":"Effect of Crianza Positiva e-messaging program on adult–child language interactions","authors":"A. Balsa, F. Lopez Boo, Juanita Bloomfield, Alejandrina Cristia, Alejandro Cid, M. Ferro, Rosario Valdés, M. L. González","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2021.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.25","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 We assess the effects of the Crianza Positiva text and audio e-messaging program on caregiver–child language interaction patterns. The program is a six-month-long intervention for families with children aged 0–2 aimed at strengthening parental competences. Its design exploits behavioral tools such as reminders, suggestions of action, and messages of encouragement to reinforce and sustain positive parenting practices. Families in 24 early childhood centers in Uruguay that completed an eight-week workshop were randomized into receiving or not receiving mobile messages. After the program, we videotaped 10-minute sessions of free play between the caregiver and the child, and decoded language patterns using automated techniques. The intervention was successful at improving the quality of parental vocalizations, as measured by the parent's pitch range. We also found suggestive evidence of increases in the duration of adult vocalizations. The results are consistent with more frequent parental self-reported involvement in reading, telling stories, and describing things to the child. Regarding the child, we find a nonrobust decrease in the duration of vocalizations, which we attribute to a crowding-out effect by the caregiver in the context of a fixed 10-minute suggested activity and a more proactive parental role.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43106746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Sir John Stuffgut's soup and a taste for desert 约翰·斯塔夫古特爵士的汤和沙漠的味道

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-08-03 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.24

A. Oliver

引用次数: 1

Gaming the system: suboptimal compliance with loot box probability disclosure regulations in China 系统博弈:中国战利品箱概率披露规定的次优合规

IF 5.1

Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-07-23 DOI: 10.1017/BPP.2021.23

Leon Y. Xiao, Laura Magdalena Henderson, Yuhan Yang, P. Newall

{"title":"Gaming the system: suboptimal compliance with loot box probability disclosure regulations in China","authors":"Leon Y. Xiao, Laura Magdalena Henderson, Yuhan Yang, P. Newall","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2021.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2021.23","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Loot boxes provide randomized rewards in video games; their purchase is linked to disordered gambling and they are present in approximately half of UK video games. The relative novelty of loot boxes means that regulators and policymakers in various jurisdictions are still deciding how to regulate them. The People's Republic of China (PRC) is the first, and presently only, jurisdiction to legally require companies to disclose the probabilities of obtaining randomized loot box rewards – an approach that is also favored by the industry as self-regulation. This study is the first to assess paid loot box prevalence in the PRC and companies’ discretionary interpretations of probability disclosure regulations. Loot boxes were found in 91 of the 100 highest-grossing PRC iPhone games. Of games deemed suitable for children aged 12+, 90.5% contained loot boxes. Probability disclosures could not be found for 4.4% of games containing loot boxes. Disclosures were implemented through various methods both in-game and on the games’ official websites; however, consistent with the concept of ‘sludge,’ only 5.5% used the most prominent format of automatically displaying the probabilities on the in-game loot box purchase page. Loot box probability disclosures should be uniform and visually prominent to best help inform consumers.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2021.23","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46868110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 36