Behavioural Public Policy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
BPP volume 5 issue 3 Cover and Back matter BPP第5卷第3期封面和封底
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.22
{"title":"BPP volume 5 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2021.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.22","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"5 1","pages":"b1 - b2"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/bpp.2021.22","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48035532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BPP volume 5 issue 3 Cover and Front matter BPP第5卷第3期封面和封面
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.21
{"title":"BPP volume 5 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2021.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.21","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"5 1","pages":"f1 - f3"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/bpp.2021.21","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45594178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Hayekian is Sunstein's behavioral economics? 孙斯坦的行为经济学是怎样的?
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI: 10.1017/BPP.2021.11
R. Sugden
{"title":"How Hayekian is Sunstein's behavioral economics?","authors":"R. Sugden","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2021.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2021.11","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 I comment on Sunstein's paper proposing ‘Hayekian behavioural economics’. In essence, Sunstein is merely renaming a familiar approach to normative economics, initiated in Sunstein and Thaler's seminal 2003 paper. I argue that this approach cannot fairly be described as in the spirit of Hayek's work. Sunstein's approach is based on a ‘constructivist’ conception of rationality that Hayek consistently criticized. Although both Hayek and Sunstein address ‘knowledge problems’, the two problems are fundamentally different. I develop what I claim are truly Hayekian critiques of Sunstein's claim that fuel economy mandates can be more Hayekian than carbon taxes.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2021.11","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47661110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
The unsolved Hayekian knowledge problem in behavioral economics 行为经济学中尚未解决的Hayekian知识问题
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-26 DOI: 10.1017/BPP.2021.18
M. Rizzo, G. Whitman
{"title":"The unsolved Hayekian knowledge problem in behavioral economics","authors":"M. Rizzo, G. Whitman","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2021.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2021.18","url":null,"abstract":"There is a limit to the productive exchange of generalizations about public policy. At some point, as William James reminds us, we must go beyond an initial insight or generalization and get into the weeds. This is what we plan to do in our response to Cass Sunstein’s article ‘Hayekian Behavioral Economics’. While an exegesis of just where Hayek himself would draw the limits of permissible government intervention may be interesting, this is not the main point of Sunstein’s article. What he intends is to persuade the reader that behavioral economic policy has reached the stage where it either can or plausibly could overcome the problems of inadequate knowledge that the two of us have claimed it faces (Rizzo & Whitman, 2009a, 2020). While Sunstein mentions us only once in a footnote, we are not aware of other attempts to elaborate this ‘Hayekian knowledge problem’ in detail. We do not point this out because we are desirous of citations, but because it is indicative of a failure to seriously and comprehensively address the relevant issues. In our prior work, we have laid out a series of specific knowledge problems that behavioral policymaking – particularly of the paternalist stripe – must confront. Sunstein’s latest work does little to address them.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2021.18","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45289915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Behavioral brittleness: the case for strategic behavioral public policy 行为脆弱性:策略性行为公共政策的案例
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-07 DOI: 10.1017/BPP.2021.16
R. Schmidt, K. Stenger
{"title":"Behavioral brittleness: the case for strategic behavioral public policy","authors":"R. Schmidt, K. Stenger","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2021.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2021.16","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Despite widespread recognition that behavioral public policy (BPP) needs to move beyond nudging if the field is to achieve more significant impact, problem-solving approaches remain optimized to achieve tactical success and are evaluated by short-term metrics with the assumption of stable systems. As a result, current methodologies may contribute to the development of solutions that appear well formed but become ‘brittle’ in the face of more complex contexts if they fail to consider important contextual cues, broader system forces, and emergent conditions, which can take three distinct forms: contextual, systemic, and anticipatory brittleness. The Covid-19 pandemic and vaccination rollout present an opportunity to identify and correct interventional brittleness with a new methodological approach – strategic BPP (SBPP) – that can inform the creation of more resilient solutions by embracing more diverse forms of evidence and applied foresight, designing interventions within ecosystems, and iteratively developing solutions. To advance the case for adopting a SBPP and ‘roughly right’ modes of inquiry, we use the Covid-19 vaccination rollout to define a new methodological roadmap, while also acknowledging that taking a more strategic approach may challenge current BPP norms.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2021.16","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57046120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Improving hand hygiene in hospitals: comparing the effect of a nudge and a boost on protocol compliance 改善医院的手部卫生:比较轻推和加强对协议遵守的影响
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.15
Henrico van Roekel, Joanne Reinhard, S. Grimmelikhuijsen
{"title":"Improving hand hygiene in hospitals: comparing the effect of a nudge and a boost on protocol compliance","authors":"Henrico van Roekel, Joanne Reinhard, S. Grimmelikhuijsen","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2021.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.15","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nudging has become a well-known policy practice. Recently, ‘boosting’ has been suggested as an alternative to nudging. In contrast to nudges, boosts aim to empower individuals to exert their own agency to make decisions. This article is one of the first to compare a nudging and a boosting intervention, and it does so in a critical field setting: hand hygiene compliance of hospital nurses. During a 4-week quasi-experiment, we tested the effect of a reframing nudge and a risk literacy boost on hand hygiene compliance in three hospital wards. The results show that nudging and boosting were both effective interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance. A tentative finding is that, while the nudge had a stronger immediate effect, the boost effect remained stable for a week, even after the removal of the intervention. We conclude that, besides nudging, researchers and policymakers may consider boosting when they seek to implement or test behavioral interventions in domains such as healthcare.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"6 1","pages":"52 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/bpp.2021.15","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44993640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
All by myself? Testing descriptive social norm-nudges to increase flood preparedness among homeowners 一个人?测试描述性社会规范有助于提高房主的防洪能力
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3616189
Jantsje M. Mol, W. Botzen, J. Blasch, E. Kranzler, H. Kunreuther
{"title":"All by myself? Testing descriptive social norm-nudges to increase flood preparedness among homeowners","authors":"Jantsje M. Mol, W. Botzen, J. Blasch, E. Kranzler, H. Kunreuther","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3616189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3616189","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Nudges based on social norms (norm-nudges) can be compelling behavioral interventions compared with traditional interventions such as taxes and regulations, but they do not work in all circumstances. We tested two empirical norm-nudge frames in an online experiment on taking measures for flood preparedness with large samples of homeowners (N = 1805) in two European countries, to evaluate the possible interactions between norm-nudge effectiveness, individual characteristics, and intercultural differences. We contrasted these norm-nudge treatments with a control and norm-focusing treatment by asking respondents to express their beliefs about what other respondents would do before making a decision relevant to their own payoff. We find no evidence of a treatment effect, suggesting that our social norm-nudges do not affect flood preparedness in the context of a flood risk investment game.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46796143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Does the visual salience of credit card features affect choice? 信用卡功能的视觉显著性是否会影响选择?
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-04-20 DOI: 10.1017/BPP.2021.14
Matthew D. Hilchey, M. Osborne, D. Soman
{"title":"Does the visual salience of credit card features affect choice?","authors":"Matthew D. Hilchey, M. Osborne, D. Soman","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2021.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2021.14","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Regulators require lenders to display a subset of credit card features in summary tables before customers finalize a credit card choice. Some jurisdictions require some features to be displayed more prominently than others to help ensure that consumers are made aware of them. This approach could lead to untoward effects on choice, such that relevant but nonprominent product features do not factor in as significantly. To test this possibility, we instructed a random sample of 1615 adults to choose between two hypothetical credit cards whose features were shown side by side in tables. The sample was instructed to select the card that would result in the lowest financial charges, given a hypothetical scenario. Critically, we randomly varied whether the annual interest rates and fees were made visually salient by making one, both, or neither brighter than other features. The findings show that even among credit-savvy individuals, choice tends strongly toward the product that outperforms the other on a salient feature. As a result, we encourage regulators to consider not only whether a key feature should be made more salient, but also the guidelines regarding when a key feature should be displayed prominently during credit card acquisition.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2021.14","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42294129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Sludge and transaction costs 污泥和交易成本
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI: 10.1017/BPP.2021.12
S. Shahab, Leonhard K. Lades
{"title":"Sludge and transaction costs","authors":"S. Shahab, Leonhard K. Lades","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2021.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2021.12","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Behavioral scientists have begun to research ‘sludge,’ excessive frictions that make it harder for people to do what they want to do. Friction is also an important concept in transaction-cost economics. Nevertheless, sludge has been discussed without explicit referral to transaction costs. Several questions arise from this observation. Is the analogy to friction used differently in both literatures? If so, what are the key differences? If not, should we develop the concept of sludge when the well-established literature on transaction costs already exists? This conceptual article shows that sludge and transaction costs are related, but distinct, concepts, and that the literature on sludge can benefit from incorporating elements from transaction-cost research. For example, we suggest defining sludge as aspects of the choice architecture that lead to the experience of costs, organize sludges using a typology inspired by the transaction-cost literature, highlight specificity, uncertainty, and frequency as important determinants of the ‘sludginess’ of choice architecture, and show that sludge audits can be conducted using methods developed in the transaction-cost literature.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"372 5","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2021.12","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41281237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Communicating evidence in icons and summary formats for policymakers: what works? 以图标和摘要形式向决策者传达证据:什么有效?
IF 5.1
Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI: 10.1017/BPP.2020.54
C. Brick, A. Freeman
{"title":"Communicating evidence in icons and summary formats for policymakers: what works?","authors":"C. Brick, A. Freeman","doi":"10.1017/BPP.2020.54","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BPP.2020.54","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Policy decisions have vast consequences, but there is little empirical research on how best to communicate underlying evidence to decision-makers. Groups in diverse fields (e.g., education, medicine, crime) use brief, graphical displays to list policy options, expected outcomes and evidence quality in order to make such evidence easy to assess. However, the understanding of these representations is rarely studied. We surveyed experts and non-experts on what information they wanted and tested their objective comprehension of commonly used graphics. A total of 252 UK residents from Prolific and 452 UK What Works Centre users interpreted the meaning of graphics shown without labels. Comprehension was low (often below 50%). The best-performing graphics combined unambiguous metaphorical shapes with color cues and indications of quantity. The participants also reported what types of evidence they wanted and in what detail (e.g., subgroups, different outcomes). Users particularly wanted to see intervention effectiveness and quality, and policymakers also wanted to know the financial costs and negative consequences. Comprehension and preferences were remarkably consistent between the two samples. Groups communicating evidence about policy options can use these results to design summaries, toolkits and reports for expert and non-expert audiences.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/BPP.2020.54","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43115802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信