Hume Studies最新文献_第8页

Transcendental Inquiry and the Belief in Body: Comments on Rocknak's Imagined Causes 超越性探究与对身体的信仰——论洛克纳克的想象成因

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0000

J. S. Marušić

{"title":"Transcendental Inquiry and the Belief in Body: Comments on Rocknak's Imagined Causes","authors":"J. S. Marušić","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2019.0000","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The title of Stefanie Rocknak's book—Imagined Causes: Hume's Conception of Objects—neatly and concisely captures the book's central claim: Hume holds that thinking about objects is a matter of imagining the causes of our perceptions. Rocknak argues that in giving an account of how we think about objects, Hume is engaged in a transcendental project. My comments focus fairly narrowly on this central thesis, which unfortunately means that I have set aside a great deal of interesting material in the book, including Rocknak's provocative and challenging interpretations of Hume's views about the nature of mental representation, time, and justification. I propose to focus on three related issues: First, I consider the sense in which, on Rocknak's view, Hume is engaged in a kind of transcendental project, and raise some questions about how to understand Rocknak's view about this project. Second, I want to raise some questions about how to understand the claim that conceiving of objects, for Hume, is a matter of imagining causes. Finally, I will look more closely at some of the evidence that Rocknak appeals to in support of this interpretation, and suggest that the interpretation faces two challenges. I invite Rocknak to say more about these challenges in her reply.","PeriodicalId":29761,"journal":{"name":"Hume Studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"69 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42883710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Précis of Hume: An Intellectual Biography 休谟的实践:一本知识分子传记

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0014

James A. Harris

引用次数: 0

Hume as Man of Letters: Comments on Harris's Hume: An Intellectual Biography 作为文人的休谟——评哈里斯的《休谟:知识分子传记》

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0015

Catherine M. Jones

引用次数: 0

Perceptions, Minds, and Hume's Self-doubts: Comments on Ainslie's Hume's True Scepticism 感知、心智与休谟的自我怀疑:评安斯利的休谟的真正怀疑主义

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0004

Jonathan Cottrell

引用次数: 0

Hume as a Social Theorist: Comments on Taylor's Reflecting Subjects 作为社会理论家的休谟——评泰勒的反思主体

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0008

W. Lemmens

引用次数: 0

Reply to My Critics 回复我的批评者

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0018

James A. Harris

引用次数: 0

Reply to My Critics 回复批评我的人

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0001

Stefanie Rocknak

{"title":"Reply to My Critics","authors":"Stefanie Rocknak","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2019.0001","url":null,"abstract":"1. Michele Loi’s paper consists in two points focusing on generational savings during Rawls’s steady state stage. First, Loi recognizes my departure from a prohibition on generational savings in case of unanimity on such positive savings, i.e. whenever there is no veto by the least well o!. Loi argues that parties under the veil of ignorance know that they could be benevolent parents willing to sacri\"ce themselves for their children, and for the children of others too. #ey should therefore reject the prohibition on savings. What probably is at stake here is what risk-averse parties should fear the most: being benevolent towards the future more than towards one’s contemporaries and ending up being prevented to act on such preferences, or being today’s least well o! and having to accept that what could make me better o! will end up in the pockets of richer future persons. It is not clear why the former should be feared more than the latter. Loi’s main argument here seems to be the following: not allowing for generational savings is illiberal and allowing for a departure from such a prohibition only in case of agreement of the least well o! will not do, because “consent in actual circumstances cannot make intergenerational saving just, unless they are permissible to begin with” (p. 7, – also p. 10). However, one could easily","PeriodicalId":29761,"journal":{"name":"Hume Studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"77 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42056728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Reply to My Critics 回复批评我的人

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0011

Jacqueline A. Taylor

引用次数: 0

Comments on Rocknak's Imagined Causes 洛克纳克《想象的原因》述评

4区哲学

Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2019.0020

Donald L. M. Baxter

引用次数: 0

Précis of Hume's True Scepticism 休谟的真正怀疑主义