Review of European Administrative Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Principle of Legality and Administrative Punishment under the ECHR: A Fused Protection 《欧洲人权公约》的法定原则与行政处罚:一种融合的保护
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2021-01-21 DOI: 10.7590/187479820X16098444161668
Agno Andrijauskaito
{"title":"The Principle of Legality and Administrative Punishment under the ECHR: A Fused Protection","authors":"Agno Andrijauskaito","doi":"10.7590/187479820X16098444161668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820X16098444161668","url":null,"abstract":"The principle of legality permeates the entire legal system based on the rule of law. It is especially well-pronounced in criminal law. However, what are its content, scope and implications when it comes to prescribing and punishing for offences which are supposedly less reprehensible,\u0000 namely – administrative offences? How precisely should they or the sanctions that they stipulate be defined in legal provisions? Furthermore, is there any room for interpretation while imposing sanctions by public bodies? This article seeks to delve into these vexed questions by examining\u0000 the relationship between the principle of legality and administrative punishment within the framework of the Council of Europe ('CoE') and the implications stemming therefrom. This will be done by dissecting the rationale and notion of this principle in the normative sources of the CoE with\u0000 a special emphasis on Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its (autonomous) application in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights as well as by identifying the shortcomings of the current perception of the legality principle in the context of administrative\u0000 punishment.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126589546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights from the Perspective of the National Judge 从国家法官的视角看欧盟基本权利宪章第51条
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2021-01-21 DOI: 10.7590/187479820X16098444161677
P. Mádr
{"title":"Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights from the Perspective of the National Judge","authors":"P. Mádr","doi":"10.7590/187479820X16098444161677","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820X16098444161677","url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the growing scholarship on the national application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights ('the Charter') by assessing what challenges national courts face when dealing with Article 51 of the Charter, which sets out the Charter's material scope of application.\u0000 In keeping with this aim, the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) – with its general formulas, abstract guidance and implementation categories – is discussed strictly from the perspective of the national judge. The article then presents the findings of a\u0000 thorough study of the case law of the Czech Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) and evaluates this Court's track record when assessing the Charter's applicability. National empirical data of that kind can provide valuable input into the CJEU-centred academic debate on the Charter's scope of\u0000 application.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116731850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Reasonable Balancing of Rights and Interests at the Time of Pandemic 大流行时期的合理权益平衡
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2021-01-21 DOI: 10.7590/187479820X16098444161695
Francesco Scalia
{"title":"The Reasonable Balancing of Rights and Interests at the Time of Pandemic","authors":"Francesco Scalia","doi":"10.7590/187479820X16098444161695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820X16098444161695","url":null,"abstract":"This essay starts with the consideration that the precautionary measures adopted by the Italian legislator and the public administration to deal with the pandemic emergency, while highly restrictive of constitutional freedoms, were commonly deemed reasonable and proportionate. It then\u0000 continues with some recent rulings of the Italian Constitutional Court. The analysis aims to show that the balance of rights implemented by the legislator and judged by the Court is affected by the state of emergency: the state of emergency makes reasonable what, in ordinary conditions, would\u0000 have been absolutely disproportionate. Proportionality, in fact – which is necessarily inherent to precautionary approach – finds a different balance point according to the context in which the precautionary measures are adopted. In 2006, Italy adopted its pandemic plan, which\u0000 was never updated as was required in accordance with the WHO guidelines formulated in 2017 and 2018. Nevertheless, the essay points out that the precautionary principle must not only shape the answer to the state of emergency, but also affect its planning and prevention. Moreover, the findings\u0000 show there was no lack of emergency forecasts or of measures suitable for the pandemic purpose, and that Italy had failed to implement these measures. Therefore, in the long term, the measures adopted by the Italian legislature and the public administration have turned out to be completely\u0000 unreasonable.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130279516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Principle of Mutual Recognition in European Administrative Law: Still Alive and Kicking? 欧洲行政法中的互认原则:还活着吗?
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.7590/187479820x16009285510467
Stefano Dorigo, M. Eliantonio, R. Lanceiro
{"title":"The Principle of Mutual Recognition in European Administrative Law: Still Alive and Kicking?","authors":"Stefano Dorigo, M. Eliantonio, R. Lanceiro","doi":"10.7590/187479820x16009285510467","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x16009285510467","url":null,"abstract":"• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122176760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sincere Cooperation, Mutual Trust, and Mutual Recognition in Social Security Coordination 在社会保障协调中精诚合作、互信互认
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.7590/187479820x16007576818834
Henrik Wenander
{"title":"Sincere Cooperation, Mutual Trust, and Mutual Recognition in Social Security Coordination","authors":"Henrik Wenander","doi":"10.7590/187479820x16007576818834","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x16007576818834","url":null,"abstract":"This article looks into the meaning of the concepts of sincere cooperation, mutual trust, and mutual recognition in EU social security coordination. It analyses the legislative choice of coordination as the main regulatory mechanism in the field, and examines the role of administrative\u0000 cooperation. Furthermore, the article highlights the challenges that arise in situations where mutual recognition is required under the Regulations, as in connection with portable documents relating to the posting of workers. It also considers the limits to mutual trust via the principle of\u0000 prohibition of fraud and abuse of rights established in the case law of the CJEU on free movement. In the last few years, this principle has been extended into the field of social security law, notably in Altun. In this way, the coordination regime does not require totally blind trust: rather,\u0000 it balances the Member States' interests of maintaining the integrity of their social security systems with the Union interest of simplifying free movement. As in other fields of EU law relating to free movement, the mutual trust between the Member States in social security coordination may\u0000 therefore be set aside in extraordinary cases.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"390 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115609556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Standing in Annulment Actions for the Withdrawal of the Banking License 银行营业执照撤销诉讼的法律地位
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.7590/187479820x16007576818898
Mārtiņš Rudzītis
{"title":"Legal Standing in Annulment Actions for the Withdrawal of the Banking License","authors":"Mārtiņš Rudzītis","doi":"10.7590/187479820x16007576818898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x16007576818898","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125327793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mutual Recognition of Driving Licences in the EU – Current State of Integration and Perspectives 欧盟驾照互认——一体化现状与展望
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.7590/187479820x16007576818780
M. Schröder
{"title":"Mutual Recognition of Driving Licences in the EU – Current State of Integration and Perspectives","authors":"M. Schröder","doi":"10.7590/187479820x16007576818780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x16007576818780","url":null,"abstract":"A driving licence is a document and an administrative act, which is, according to the principle of territoriality, only valid in the territory of the issuing State. This is incompatible with practical needs of international traffic, and mutual recognition helps to overcome the problem.\u0000 This article presents the development of mutual recognition of driving licences in the EU, from pre-existing public international law to current harmonising legislation and the relevant ECJ jurisprudence. It finds that once there was sufficient harmonisation, the ECJ promoted mutual recognition,\u0000 while the EU legislator had to close the loopholes for 'driving licence tourism' by amending the directives. Unlike in other areas of the internal market, primary law never played an important role for the mutual recognition of driving licences. Determining the current state of integration,\u0000 the article identifies a lack of information exchange between Member States and a lack of harmonisation of sanctions as main obstacles for full, unconditional recognition, and proposes ways leading towards an 'internal market of driving licences'.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126365716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mutual Recognition versus Transnational Administration in Tax Law: Is Fiscal Sovereignty Still Alive? 税法上的互认与跨国管理:财政主权还活着吗?
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.7590/187479820x16007576818861
Stefano Dorigo
{"title":"Mutual Recognition versus Transnational Administration in Tax Law: Is Fiscal Sovereignty Still Alive?","authors":"Stefano Dorigo","doi":"10.7590/187479820x16007576818861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x16007576818861","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the evolution of the concept of mutual recognition in tax matters. For many decades, the prevailing idea was that a state's fiscal sovereignty prevented the recognition of a foreign tax decision. Now, however, the situation is changing, especially following the economic\u0000 crisis of 2008 and the proliferation of international tax avoidance phenomena fed by multinational enterprises. As a consequence of these recent developments, tax decisions have often become the result of the contribution of several national authorities (sometimes also supported by supranational\u0000 bodies). Mutual recognition has thus become basically useless. One can therefore speak about a new notion of tax sovereignty, according to which the peculiarities of a single legal system are not protected either through mutual closure or mutual recognition, but via ex ante procedural cooperation.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133616672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mutual Recognition and the Ever-incomplete Internal Market for Pharmaceuticals 相互承认与不完善的药品内部市场
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.7590/187479820x16007576818799
S. Röttger-Wirtz
{"title":"Mutual Recognition and the Ever-incomplete Internal Market for Pharmaceuticals","authors":"S. Röttger-Wirtz","doi":"10.7590/187479820x16007576818799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x16007576818799","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the development of mutual recognition of marketing authorizations for pharmaceuticals, arguing that the sui generis approach to mutual recognition in this policy area is based, first of all, on the harmonisation of regulatory requirements. However, it additionally\u0000 also required the procedural integration of mutual recognition in trans-national administrative procedures, and institutional innovation. This has created a curious mix of centralized and decentralized authorisation routes with various stages of collaboration and arbitration. In this regard,\u0000 the creation of the complex, composite procedures in place to facilitate the mutual recognition of pharmaceuticals raises several questions with regard to the judicial and political accountability of the actors involved. The developments and problems described in this article with regard to\u0000 pharmaceuticals are also mirrored in other risk regulation areas, where mutual recognition seems to require the integration into administrative procedures on intra-administrative and/or EU level, leading to proliferation of sui generis approaches to mutual recognition.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114798438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mutual Recognition, Pre-emption and De-centralisation in the Common Agricultural Policy 共同农业政策中的互认、优先和去中心化
Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.7590/187479820X16007576818870
Annalisa Volpato
{"title":"Mutual Recognition, Pre-emption and De-centralisation in the Common Agricultural Policy","authors":"Annalisa Volpato","doi":"10.7590/187479820X16007576818870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820X16007576818870","url":null,"abstract":"The CAP is a fundamental policy area which has experienced profound changes since its establishment in the early years of EU integration – changes in nature, organization and power balance between the EU and national level. Within this policy area, the principle of mutual recognition\u0000 is traditionally considered inapplicable. However, the increasing decentralisation of the CAP and subsequent regaining of regulatory powers by the Member States may pave the way for a more significant application of this principle. Mutual recognition also finds application in some sectoral\u0000 legislation in the field. Thus, the objective of this contribution is to reflect on the role of the principle of mutual recognition in light of this evolution and, in doing so, highlighting the correlations between this principle, pre-emption and decentralisation in EU agri-food law.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132215353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信