Review of European Administrative Law最新文献_第10页

The Guises of and Guidance to Administrative Discretion in the European Court of Justice's Interpretation of EU Immigration Law 欧洲法院对欧盟移民法解释中行政自由裁量权的伪装与指导

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI: 10.7590/187479819x15656877527205

J. Bornemann

引用次数: 0

A Jurisdiction of Jurisdictions 司法管辖区的司法管辖权

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI: 10.7590/187479819x15656877527179

Joseba Fernández Gaztea

引用次数: 1

'Guess Who? The SRB as the Accountable Actor in Legal Review Procedures' “猜猜谁?在法律覆核程序中担当问责行为者的SRB

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI: 10.7590/187479819x15656877527232

J. Timmermans

引用次数: 0

Accountability and control across a changing, multilevel administration 在不断变化的多层次管理中，问责制和控制

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI: 10.7590/187479819x15656877527151

F. B. Bastos

引用次数: 0

Controlling the Invisible: Accountability Issues in the Exercise of Implementing Powers by EU Agencies and in Harmonised Standardisation 控制无形:欧盟机构行使执行权和协调标准化中的问责问题

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI: 10.7590/187479819x15656877527197

Annalisa Volpato

引用次数: 1

Public Enforcement of EU Antitrust Law: A Circle of Trust? 欧盟反垄断法的公共执法:一个信任圈?

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI: 10.7590/187479819X15656877527214

N. Dzino, C. Rusu

{"title":"Public Enforcement of EU Antitrust Law: A Circle of Trust?","authors":"N. Dzino, C. Rusu","doi":"10.7590/187479819X15656877527214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479819X15656877527214","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of trust is key to effectively enforcing the EU antitrust prohibitions in the ECN multi-level administration context. The manifestation of this concept is identified at different stages of the public enforcement system, where the Commission and the NCAs share the enforcement\u0000 workload and assist each other's actions. Various EU legislative, soft-law and case-law landmarks have progressively contributed to developing this idea of trust, culminating with the adoption of Directive 2019/1, which aims to render NCAs as more effective enforcers of Articles 101 and 102\u0000 TFEU. In this paper, we intend to determine whether the Directive furthers the trust already established in the last fifteen years of enforcement experience. We first track the development of the trust in the NCAs' EU antitrust enforcement work and assesses the building-blocks on which trust\u0000 is shaped. Next, we evaluate the Directive's core elements (dealing with institutional design, enforcement and sanctioning powers, leniency, mutual assistance, etc.), in order to gauge their trust-enhancing potential, and to test whether the Directive correctly follows through the EU hard-,\u0000 soft-, and case-law. We also look into any remaining enforcement gaps, which may undermine the trust between the European antitrust enforcers, and consequently the Directive's core objectives.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126711695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Administrative factual conduct: Legal effects and judicial control in EU law 行政事实行为:欧盟法律中的法律效力与司法控制

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.7590/187479819X15656877527188

Napoleon Xanthoulis

引用次数: 1

Joana Mendes and Ingo Venzke (eds.), Allocating Authority. Who Should Do What in European and International Law?, Bloomsburry, 2018 Joana Mendes和Ingo Venzke主编，《分配权力》。在欧洲和国际法中谁应该做什么?， bloomsbury, 2018

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.7590/187479818x15481611819903

M. Scholten

引用次数: 0

Armin von Bogdandy, Peter Michael Huber and Sabino Cassese (eds.), The Administrative State, Volume I, The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, Oxford University Press, 2017 Armin von Bogdandy, Peter Michael Huber和Sabino Cassese(编)，行政国家，卷一，欧洲公法中的马克斯普朗克手册，牛津大学出版社，2017

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.7590/187479818X15481611819912

Natasa Athanasiadou

引用次数: 0

Hidden Signposts: The Normative Framework of the EU E-Customs Initiative 隐藏的路标:欧盟电子海关倡议的规范框架

Review of European Administrative Law Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.7590/187479818x15481611819921

E. Tauschinsky

{"title":"Hidden Signposts: The Normative Framework of the EU E-Customs Initiative","authors":"E. Tauschinsky","doi":"10.7590/187479818x15481611819921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479818x15481611819921","url":null,"abstract":"The Union Customs Code and its Delegated and Implementing Acts have established the framework for a digital customs administration. With these measures, one of the first areas of EU administration has been digitalised. However, in the myriad technical documents accompanying this process,\u0000 it is easy to lose sight of the normative framework which is supposed to guide the digitalisation process and is necessary to hold those responsible to account. This paper examines the legal documents surrounding the establishment of the EU e-customs regime for the values and norms\u0000 which are set to shape the digitalisation effort. It draws out the normative framework that is implicit in the legal acts. The resulting picture presents customs digitalisation as situated between the EU search for uniformity and efficiency, normative orientation towards market participants'\u0000 needs and Member State powers over the implementation process. However, these values appear under-conceptualised, which restricts their normative force. Secondly, important administrative values such as equality, transparency and participation are referred to only sporadically if at all within\u0000 the documents. In addition, the regime appears oblivious to the guiding (instead of only limiting) potential of data management. If this is where e-government at the European level is heading, there is clear room for improvement.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122373182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0