“猜猜谁?在法律覆核程序中担当问责行为者的SRB

J. Timmermans
{"title":"“猜猜谁?在法律覆核程序中担当问责行为者的SRB","authors":"J. Timmermans","doi":"10.7590/187479819x15656877527232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SRM is an institutionally complex system in which it is unclear which actor is to be held legally accountable. The reason for this complexity flows from the fact that the exercise of powers is spread over a multitude of actors at different levels. Within the SRM's framework, we\n find both vertical and horizontal cooperative links. In relation to the vertical links, EU actors take the main decisions, while the implementation is left to national actors. Horizontal cooperative links at the EU level are also present as EU institutions and an EU agency have to act together\n in composite administrative procedures. This institutional set-up results in unclarity as to where responsibility lies. If legal protection is to be provided against decisions resolving significant banks, it has to be clear who should be held responsible in legal review procedures. The article's\n aim is to examine what issues of legal review exist and to analyse where the de facto decision-making, and thus legal responsibility, lies within the SRM's framework.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Guess Who? The SRB as the Accountable Actor in Legal Review Procedures'\",\"authors\":\"J. Timmermans\",\"doi\":\"10.7590/187479819x15656877527232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The SRM is an institutionally complex system in which it is unclear which actor is to be held legally accountable. The reason for this complexity flows from the fact that the exercise of powers is spread over a multitude of actors at different levels. Within the SRM's framework, we\\n find both vertical and horizontal cooperative links. In relation to the vertical links, EU actors take the main decisions, while the implementation is left to national actors. Horizontal cooperative links at the EU level are also present as EU institutions and an EU agency have to act together\\n in composite administrative procedures. This institutional set-up results in unclarity as to where responsibility lies. If legal protection is to be provided against decisions resolving significant banks, it has to be clear who should be held responsible in legal review procedures. The article's\\n aim is to examine what issues of legal review exist and to analyse where the de facto decision-making, and thus legal responsibility, lies within the SRM's framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479819x15656877527232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479819x15656877527232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SRM是一个制度复杂的系统,在这个系统中,谁应该承担法律责任并不明确。造成这种复杂性的原因是权力的行使分散在不同层次的众多行动者身上。在SRM的框架内,我们发现了纵向和横向的合作联系。在纵向联系方面,欧盟行为体做出主要决定,而实施则留给各国行为体。欧盟层面的横向合作联系也存在,因为欧盟机构和欧盟机构必须在复合行政程序中共同行动。这种体制设置导致责任不明确。如果要为解决大银行破产的决定提供法律保护,就必须明确谁应该在法律审查程序中负责。本文的目的是检查存在哪些法律审查问题,并分析在SRM的框架内,事实上的决策以及由此产生的法律责任在哪里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Guess Who? The SRB as the Accountable Actor in Legal Review Procedures'
The SRM is an institutionally complex system in which it is unclear which actor is to be held legally accountable. The reason for this complexity flows from the fact that the exercise of powers is spread over a multitude of actors at different levels. Within the SRM's framework, we find both vertical and horizontal cooperative links. In relation to the vertical links, EU actors take the main decisions, while the implementation is left to national actors. Horizontal cooperative links at the EU level are also present as EU institutions and an EU agency have to act together in composite administrative procedures. This institutional set-up results in unclarity as to where responsibility lies. If legal protection is to be provided against decisions resolving significant banks, it has to be clear who should be held responsible in legal review procedures. The article's aim is to examine what issues of legal review exist and to analyse where the de facto decision-making, and thus legal responsibility, lies within the SRM's framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信