隐藏的路标:欧盟电子海关倡议的规范框架

E. Tauschinsky
{"title":"隐藏的路标:欧盟电子海关倡议的规范框架","authors":"E. Tauschinsky","doi":"10.7590/187479818x15481611819921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Union Customs Code and its Delegated and Implementing Acts have established the framework for a digital customs administration. With these measures, one of the first areas of EU administration has been digitalised. However, in the myriad technical documents accompanying this process,\n it is easy to lose sight of the normative framework which is supposed to guide the digitalisation process and is necessary to hold those responsible to account. This paper examines the legal documents surrounding the establishment of the EU e-customs regime for the values and norms\n which are set to shape the digitalisation effort. It draws out the normative framework that is implicit in the legal acts. The resulting picture presents customs digitalisation as situated between the EU search for uniformity and efficiency, normative orientation towards market participants'\n needs and Member State powers over the implementation process. However, these values appear under-conceptualised, which restricts their normative force. Secondly, important administrative values such as equality, transparency and participation are referred to only sporadically if at all within\n the documents. In addition, the regime appears oblivious to the guiding (instead of only limiting) potential of data management. If this is where e-government at the European level is heading, there is clear room for improvement.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hidden Signposts: The Normative Framework of the EU E-Customs Initiative\",\"authors\":\"E. Tauschinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.7590/187479818x15481611819921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Union Customs Code and its Delegated and Implementing Acts have established the framework for a digital customs administration. With these measures, one of the first areas of EU administration has been digitalised. However, in the myriad technical documents accompanying this process,\\n it is easy to lose sight of the normative framework which is supposed to guide the digitalisation process and is necessary to hold those responsible to account. This paper examines the legal documents surrounding the establishment of the EU e-customs regime for the values and norms\\n which are set to shape the digitalisation effort. It draws out the normative framework that is implicit in the legal acts. The resulting picture presents customs digitalisation as situated between the EU search for uniformity and efficiency, normative orientation towards market participants'\\n needs and Member State powers over the implementation process. However, these values appear under-conceptualised, which restricts their normative force. Secondly, important administrative values such as equality, transparency and participation are referred to only sporadically if at all within\\n the documents. In addition, the regime appears oblivious to the guiding (instead of only limiting) potential of data management. If this is where e-government at the European level is heading, there is clear room for improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479818x15481611819921\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479818x15481611819921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《联盟海关法》及其授权和实施法案为数字海关管理建立了框架。通过这些措施,欧盟行政管理的首批领域之一已经数字化。然而,在伴随这一过程的无数技术文件中,很容易忽视规范框架,该框架应该指导数字化进程,并且有必要追究责任人的责任。本文研究了围绕建立欧盟电子海关制度的价值和规范的法律文件,这些价值和规范旨在塑造数字化工作。它引出了隐含在法律行为中的规范性框架。由此产生的图片显示,海关数字化位于欧盟对统一性和效率的追求、对市场参与者需求的规范导向和成员国在实施过程中的权力之间。然而,这些价值观似乎概念化不足,这限制了它们的规范性力量。第二,重要的行政价值,如平等、透明度和参与,即使在文件中有提及,也只是偶尔提到。此外,该制度似乎忽略了数据管理的引导(而不仅仅是限制)潜力。如果这就是欧洲电子政务的发展方向,那么还有明显的改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hidden Signposts: The Normative Framework of the EU E-Customs Initiative
The Union Customs Code and its Delegated and Implementing Acts have established the framework for a digital customs administration. With these measures, one of the first areas of EU administration has been digitalised. However, in the myriad technical documents accompanying this process, it is easy to lose sight of the normative framework which is supposed to guide the digitalisation process and is necessary to hold those responsible to account. This paper examines the legal documents surrounding the establishment of the EU e-customs regime for the values and norms which are set to shape the digitalisation effort. It draws out the normative framework that is implicit in the legal acts. The resulting picture presents customs digitalisation as situated between the EU search for uniformity and efficiency, normative orientation towards market participants' needs and Member State powers over the implementation process. However, these values appear under-conceptualised, which restricts their normative force. Secondly, important administrative values such as equality, transparency and participation are referred to only sporadically if at all within the documents. In addition, the regime appears oblivious to the guiding (instead of only limiting) potential of data management. If this is where e-government at the European level is heading, there is clear room for improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信